Literature DB >> 30150225

Genetic constraints on microevolutionary divergence of sex-biased gene expression.

Scott L Allen1, Russell Bonduriansky2, Stephen F Chenoweth3.   

Abstract

The evolution of sex-specific phenotypes is an important dimension of diversification and local adaptation. The sex-dependent regulation of gene expression is considered a key genomic mechanism facilitating sex-dependent adaptation. In many species, genes with male-biased expression evolve faster in DNA sequence and expression level than genes with female-biased or sexually monomorphic expression. While positive selection may be responsible for rapid DNA sequence evolution, why expression of male-biased genes also evolves rapidly remains unclear. Beyond sex differences in selection, some aspects of the genetic architecture of gene expression could contribute to the rapid evolution of male-biased gene expression. First, male-biased genes might simply have greater standing genetic variance than female-biased genes. Second, male-biased genes could be less constrained by pleiotropy, either within or between sexes. Here, we evaluate these alternative explanations on an intraspecific scale using a series of quantitative genetic experiments conducted on natural variation in male and female gene expression in the fly Drosophila serrata Male-biased genes had significantly higher genetic variance than female-biased genes and were generally more narrowly expressed across tissues, suggesting lower within-individual pleiotropy. However, consistent with stronger constraints due to between-sex pleiotropy, their between-sex genetic correlations, rMF, were higher than for female-biased genes and more strongly negatively associated with sex bias. Using an extensive clinal dataset, we tested whether sex differences in gene expression divergence among populations have been shaped by pleiotropy. Here too, male-biased gene divergence was more strongly associated with between-sex pleiotropy than was female-biased gene divergence. Systematic differences in genetic variance and pleiotropy may be important factors influencing sex-specific adaptation arising through changes in gene expression.This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  clines; genetic constraints; sex-biased gene expression; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30150225      PMCID: PMC6125734          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  63 in total

1.  Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models.

Authors:  R D Wolfinger; G Gibson; E D Wolfinger; L Bennett; H Hamadeh; P Bushel; C Afshari; R S Paules
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data.

Authors:  M K Kerr; M Martin; G A Churchill
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 3.  Sex-biased gene expression and sexual conflict throughout development.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; Ilona Flis; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The Genomics of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Stephen F Chenoweth; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Tissue Specificity and Sex-Specific Regulatory Variation Permit the Evolution of Sex-Biased Gene Expression.

Authors:  Rebecca Dean; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Quantitative Genetics of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations between Sexes for Head and Thorax Traits.

Authors:  D E Cowley; W R Atchley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Supervised normalization of microarrays.

Authors:  Brigham H Mecham; Peter S Nelson; John D Storey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Autosomal genetic control of human gene expression does not differ across the sexes.

Authors:  Irfahan Kassam; Luke Lloyd-Jones; Alexander Holloway; Kerrin S Small; Biao Zeng; Andrew Bakshi; Andres Metspalu; Greg Gibson; Tim D Spector; Tonu Esko; Grant W Montgomery; Joseph E Powell; Jian Yang; Peter M Visscher; Allan F McRae
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Defining signal thresholds in DNA microarrays: exemplary application for invasive cancer.

Authors:  M Bilban; L K Buehler; S Head; G Desoye; V Quaranta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Linking sex differences to the evolution of infectious disease life-histories.

Authors:  Matthew D Hall; Nicole Mideo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Detecting signatures of selection on gene expression.

Authors:  Christopher R Cooney; Alison E Wright; Peter D Price; Daniela H Palmer Droguett; Jessica A Taylor; Dong Won Kim; Elsie S Place; Thea F Rogers; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 19.100

4.  Sexual dimorphism and sex-biased gene expression in an egg parasitoid species, Anastatus disparis.

Authors:  Peng-Cheng Liu; De-Jun Hao; Hao-Yuan Hu; Jian-Rong Wei
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Pleiotropy Modulates the Efficacy of Selection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; Gemma Puixeu Sala; Beatriz Vicoso
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Predicting the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in Gene Expression.

Authors:  David Houle; Changde Cheng
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Transcriptome analysis of sex-biased gene expression in the spotted-wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura).

Authors:  Dan Deng; Shisi Xing; Xuxiang Liu; Qinge Ji; Zongzhao Zhai; Wei Peng
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.542

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.