Literature DB >> 22997237

Trade-off between selection for dosage compensation and masculinization on the avian Z chromosome.

Alison E Wright1, Hooman K Moghadam, Judith E Mank.   

Abstract

Following the suppression of recombination, gene expression levels decline on the sex-limited chromosome, and this can lead to selection for dosage compensation in the heterogametic sex to rebalance average expression from the X or Z chromosome with average autosomal expression. At the same time, due to their unequal pattern of inheritance in males and females, the sex chromosomes are subject to unbalanced sex-specific selection, which contributes to a nonrandom distribution of sex-biased genes compared to the remainder of the genome. These two forces act against each other, and the relative importance of each is currently unclear. The Gallus gallus Z chromosome provides a useful opportunity to study the importance and trade-offs between sex-specific selection and dosage compensation in shaping the evolution of the genome as it shows incomplete dosage compensation and is also present twice as often in males than females, and therefore predicted to be enriched for male-biased genes. Here, we refine our understanding of the evolution of the avian Z chromosome, and show that multiple strata formed across the chromosome over ∼130 million years. We then use this evolutionary history to examine the relative strength of selection for sex chromosome dosage compensation vs. the cumulative effects of masculinizing selection on gene expression. We find that male-biased expression increases over time, indicating that selection for dosage compensation is relatively less important than masculinizing selection in shaping Z chromosome gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22997237      PMCID: PMC3512148          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.145102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  94 in total

1.  Life history and the male mutation bias.

Authors:  Anna Bartosch-Härlid; Sofia Berlin; Nick G C Smith; Anders P Møller; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates: implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sexual selection and sex linkage.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; David W Hall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes.

Authors:  S Karlin; S F Altschul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  J C Lucchesi
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Male-biased mutation rate and divergence in autosomal, z-linked and w-linked introns of chicken and Turkey.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Nick G C Smith; Hannah Sundström; Sofia Berlin; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome.

Authors:  Julien Meunier; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The mouse X chromosome is enriched for sex-biased genes not subject to selection by meiotic sex chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Pavel P Khil; Natalya A Smirnova; Peter J Romanienko; R Daniel Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-05-23       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Evolutionary strata on the chicken Z chromosome: implications for sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Lori-Jayne Lawson Handley; Helene Ceplitis; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  41 in total

1.  Conservation of Regional Variation in Sex-Specific Sex Chromosome Regulation.

Authors:  Alison E Wright; Fabian Zimmer; Peter W Harrison; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sex-biased gene expression at homomorphic sex chromosomes in emus and its implication for sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Vera B Kaiser; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Whole-genome sequence of a flatfish provides insights into ZW sex chromosome evolution and adaptation to a benthic lifestyle.

Authors:  Songlin Chen; Guojie Zhang; Changwei Shao; Quanfei Huang; Geng Liu; Pei Zhang; Wentao Song; Na An; Domitille Chalopin; Jean-Nicolas Volff; Yunhan Hong; Qiye Li; Zhenxia Sha; Heling Zhou; Mingshu Xie; Qiulin Yu; Yang Liu; Hui Xiang; Na Wang; Kui Wu; Changgeng Yang; Qian Zhou; Xiaolin Liao; Linfeng Yang; Qiaomu Hu; Jilin Zhang; Liang Meng; Lijun Jin; Yongsheng Tian; Jinmin Lian; Jingfeng Yang; Guidong Miao; Shanshan Liu; Zhuo Liang; Fang Yan; Yangzhen Li; Bin Sun; Hong Zhang; Jing Zhang; Ying Zhu; Min Du; Yongwei Zhao; Manfred Schartl; Qisheng Tang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Complex evolutionary trajectories of sex chromosomes across bird taxa.

Authors:  Qi Zhou; Jilin Zhang; Doris Bachtrog; Na An; Quanfei Huang; Erich D Jarvis; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Support for faster and more adaptive Z chromosome evolution in two divergent lepidopteran lineages.

Authors:  Andrew J Mongue; Megan E Hansen; James R Walters
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Sexual conflict through mother's curse and father's curse.

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Manisha Munasinghe; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 8.  Conflict on the sex chromosomes: cause, effect, and complexity.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; David J Hosken; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Comparative sex chromosome genomics in snakes: differentiation, evolutionary strata, and lack of global dosage compensation.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; J J Emerson; Yulia Zektser; Shivani Mahajan; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Masculinization of gene expression is associated with exaggeration of male sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Marie A Pointer; Peter W Harrison; Alison E Wright; Judith E Mank
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.