Literature DB >> 20871181

When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise.

Jerker Rönnberg1, Mary Rudner, Thomas Lunner, Adriana A Zekveld.   

Abstract

Perceptual load and cognitive load can be separately manipulated and dissociated in their effects on speech understanding in noise. The Ease of Language Understanding model assumes a theoretical position where perceptual task characteristics interact with the individual's implicit capacities to extract the phonological elements of speech. Phonological precision and speed of lexical access are important determinants for listening in adverse conditions. If there are mismatches between the phonological elements perceived and phonological representations in long-term memory, explicit working memory (WM)-related capacities will be continually invoked to reconstruct and infer the contents of the ongoing discourse. Whether this induces a high cognitive load or not will in turn depend on the individual's storage and processing capacities in WM. Data suggest that modulated noise maskers may serve as triggers for speech maskers and therefore induce a WM, explicit mode of processing. Individuals with high WM capacity benefit more than low WM-capacity individuals from fast amplitude compression at low or negative input speech-to-noise ratios. The general conclusion is that there is an overarching interaction between the focal purpose of processing in the primary listening task and the extent to which a secondary, distracting task taps into these processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20871181     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.70505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  67 in total

1.  The effects of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise.

Authors:  Rebecca Carroll; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

2.  The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening.

Authors:  Tepring Piquado; Jonathan I Benichov; Hiram Brownell; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Susan E Teubner-Rhodes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Long-term musical experience and auditory and visual perceptual abilities under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of Steady-State Noise on Verbal Working Memory in Young Adults.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Mary Alt; Gayle DeDe; Sarah Olson; James Shehorn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.