Literature DB >> 22731919

The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening.

Tepring Piquado1, Jonathan I Benichov, Hiram Brownell, Arthur Wingfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to determine whether negative effects of hearing loss on recall accuracy for spoken narratives can be mitigated by allowing listeners to control the rate of speech input.
DESIGN: Paragraph-length narratives were presented for recall under two listening conditions in a within-participants design: presentation without interruption (continuous) at an average speech-rate of 150 words per minute; and presentation interrupted at periodic intervals at which participants were allowed to pause before initiating the next segment (self-paced). STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were 24 adults ranging from 21 to 33 years of age. Half had age-normal hearing acuity and half had mild- to-moderate hearing loss. The two groups were comparable for age, years of formal education, and vocabulary.
RESULTS: When narrative passages were presented continuously, without interruption, participants with hearing loss recalled significantly fewer story elements, both main ideas and narrative details, than those with age-normal hearing. The recall difference was eliminated when the two groups were allowed to self-pace the speech input.
CONCLUSION: Results support the hypothesis that the listening effort associated with reduced hearing acuity can slow processing operations and increase demands on working memory, with consequent negative effects on accuracy of narrative recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22731919      PMCID: PMC3632314          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.684403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  52 in total

1.  Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  On Using Analysis Of Covariance In Repeated Measures Designs.

Authors:  H D Delaney; S E Maxwell
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.

Authors:  Sarah Fraser; Jean-Pierre Gagné; Majolaine Alepins; Pascale Dubois
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Visual noise disrupts conceptual integration in reading.

Authors:  Xuefei Gao; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Soo Rim Noh; Rhea T Eskew
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

5.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

6.  Mental distress and quality of life in the hard of hearing.

Authors:  J Fellinger; D Holzinger; J Gerich; D Goldberg
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 7.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

8.  Distinct effects of perceptual quality on auditory word recognition, memory formation and recall in a neural model of sequential memory.

Authors:  Paul Miller; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-03

9.  Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults' report accuracy for verbal materials.

Authors:  Raj Stewart; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging.

Authors:  A Wingfield; A H Alexander; S Cavigelli
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Sensory-Cognitive Interactions in Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Levi A Young
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela Souza; Rosalinda Baca; James M Kates
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech.

Authors:  Caitlin M Ward; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Effects of hearing loss on heart rate variability and skin conductance measured during sentence recognition in noise.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Imola X MacPhee; Emily W Heldt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.

Authors:  Margaret A Koeritzer; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Modelling longitudinal changes in older adults' memory for spoken discourse: findings from the ACTIVE cohort.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Alden L Gross; Jeanine M Parisi; Shannon M Sisco; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Michael Marsiske; George W Rebok
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2013-12-04

10.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.