Literature DB >> 20869305

Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback.

Hanjun Liu1, Michelle Meshman, Roozbeh Behroozmand, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the differential effects of voice auditory feedback perturbation direction and magnitude on voice fundamental frequency (F(0)) responses and event-related potentials (ERPs) from EEG electrodes on the scalp.
METHODS: The voice F(0) responses and N1 and P2 components of ERPs were examined from 12 right-handed speakers when they sustained a vowel phonation and their mid-utterance voice pitch feedback was shifted ±100, ±200, and ±500 cents with 200 ms duration.
RESULTS: Downward voice pitch feedback perturbations led to larger voice F(0) responses than upward perturbations. The amplitudes of N1 and P2 components were larger for downward compared with upward pitch-shifts for 200 and 500 cents stimulus magnitudes. Shorter N1 and P2 latencies were also associated with larger magnitudes of pitch feedback perturbations.
CONCLUSIONS: Corresponding changes in vocal and neural responses to upward and downward voice pitch feedback perturbations suggest that the N1 and P2 components of ERPs reflect neural concomitants of the vocal responses. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of interactive effects between the magnitude and direction of voice feedback pitch perturbation on N1 and P2 ERP components indicate that the neural mechanisms underlying error detection and correction in voice pitch auditory feedback are differentially sensitive to both the magnitude and direction of pitch perturbations.
Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20869305      PMCID: PMC3151676          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  20 in total

1.  Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.

Authors:  U Natke; K T Kalveram
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing.

Authors:  Ulrich Natke; Thomas M Donath; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Kensuke Sekihara; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Charles R Larson; Jay J Bauer; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback.

Authors:  T A Burnett; M B Freedland; C R Larson; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Time-dependent neural processing of auditory feedback during voice pitch error detection.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  38 in total

1.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Corollary Discharge Mechanisms During Vocal Production in Marmoset Monkeys.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-06-29

3.  Cerebellar contribution to auditory feedback control of speech production: Evidence from patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Jiajun Zhuang; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Zhiqin Xu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Lindsey Sattler; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  ERP correlates of pitch error detection in complex tone and voice auditory feedback with missing fundamental.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Predicting auditory feedback control of speech production from subregional shape of subcortical structures.

Authors:  Xiaoying Tang; Na Chen; Siyun Zhang; Jeffery A Jones; Baofeng Zhang; Jingyuan Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Laura Karvelis; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vocal and Neural Responses to Unexpected Changes in Voice Pitch Auditory Feedback During Register Transitions.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Anjli Lodhavia; Saul Frankford; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.