Literature DB >> 20868815

Factors affecting survival after mitral valve replacement in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Abdulhameed Aziz1, Jennifer S Lawton, Hersh S Maniar, Michael K Pasque, Ralph J Damiano, Marc R Moon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after mitral valve replacement.
METHODS: From 1992 to 2008, 765 patients underwent bioprosthetic (325; 42%) or mechanical (440; 58%) mitral valve replacement, including 370 (48%) patients older than 65 years of age. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was defined as severe (prosthetic effective orifice area to body surface area ratio <0.9 cm(2)/m(2)), moderate (0.9 to 1.2 cm(2)/m(2)), or absent (>1.2 cm(2)/m(2)).
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified nine risk factors for late death including advanced age, earlier operative year, chronic renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, nonrheumatic origin, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, lower body surface area, and more severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (lower effective orifice area to body surface area ratio; p < 0.05). For bioprosthetic recipients older than 65 years of age, survival at 5 and 10 years was 30% ± 7% and 0% ± 0% with severe mismatch compared with 43% ± 4% and 21% ± 5% for absent or moderate mismatch, respectively (p = 0.05). For mechanical recipients younger than 65 years of age, survival at 5 and 10 years was 77% ± 4% and 62% ± 6% with moderate or severe mismatch compared with 82% ± 3% and 66% ± 4%, respectively, without mismatch (p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Severe mismatch adversely affected long-term survival for older patients receiving bioprosthetic valves. With mechanical valves, there was a trend toward impaired survival when mismatch was moderate or severe in younger patients. Thus, selection of an appropriate mitral prosthesis warrants careful consideration of age and valve type.
Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868815      PMCID: PMC4332802          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  22 in total

1.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: the evidence continues to accumulate.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Survival after mitral valve replacement: does the valve type and/or size make a difference?

Authors:  R Morton Bolman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Hemodynamic impact of mitral prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary hypertension: an in silico study.

Authors:  David Tanné; Lyes Kadem; Régis Rieu; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-08-21

4.  Flow characteristics of bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  M Y Rashtian; D M Stevenson; D T Allen; A P Yoganathan; E C Harrison; W A Edmiston; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Valve prosthesis--patient mismatch. A long-term sequela.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola; E Murphy
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-03

6.  Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Mingzhou Li; Jean G Dumesnil; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Mosaic valve international clinical trial: early performance results.

Authors:  G J Fradet; N Bleese; J Burgess; P C Cartier
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  POINT: Prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marc R Moon; Jennifer S Lawton; Nader Moazami; Nabil A Munfakh; Michael K Pasque; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Buu-Khanh Lam; Vincent Chan; Paul Hendry; Marc Ruel; Roy Masters; Pierre Bedard; Bill Goldstein; Fraser Rubens; Thierry Mesana
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Negatively Affects Outcomes after Mitral Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of 10,239 Patients.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Roberto Gouvea Silva Diniz; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

3.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Mitral Valve Replacement: Comparison of Different Methods of Effective Orifice Area Calculation.

Authors:  In Jeong Cho; Geu Ru Hong; Seung Hyun Lee; Sak Lee; Byung Chul Chang; Chi Young Shim; Hyuk Jae Chang; Jong Won Ha; Namsik Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: a single-centered retrospective analysis in East China.

Authors:  Armah M Akuffu; Haige Zhao; Junnan Zheng; Yiming Ni
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early and late outcomes after mitral valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Wei Tan; Yi-Fan Bai; Xiao-Hong Liu; Zhi-Yun Xu; Zhao An; Ye Ma; Li-Bo Zhao; Bai-Ling Li
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 6.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: A pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data.

Authors:  Anton Tomšič; Bardia Arabkhani; Jan W Schoones; Jonathan R G Etnel; Nina A Marsan; Robert J M Klautz; Meindert Palmen
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 1.778

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.