Anton Tomšič1, Bardia Arabkhani1, Jan W Schoones2, Jonathan R G Etnel3, Nina A Marsan4, Robert J M Klautz1, Meindert Palmen1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The hemodynamic effect and early and late survival impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after mitral valve replacement remains insufficiently explored. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English language original publications. The search yielded 791 potentially relevant studies. The final review and analysis included 19 studies compromising 11,675 patients. RESULTS: Prosthetic effective orifice area was calculated with the continuity equation method in 7 (37%), pressure half-time method in 2 (10%), and partially or fully obtained from referenced values in 10 (53%) studies. Risk factors for PPM included gender (male), diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, and the use of bioprostheses. When pooling unadjusted data, PPM was associated with higher perioperative (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.10; p < .001) and late mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.21-1.77; p < .001). Moreover, PPM was associated with higher late mortality when Cox proportional-hazards regression (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.57-2.47; p < .001) and propensity score (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.34-2.95; p < .001) adjusted data were pooled. Contrarily, moderate (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.84-1.22; p = .88) or severe (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.89-1.58; p = .24) PPM were not related to higher late mortality when adjusted data were pooled individually. PPM was associated with higher systolic pulmonary pressures (mean difference: 7.88 mmHg; 95% CI: 4.72-11.05; p < .001) and less pulmonary hypertension regression (OR: 5.78; 95% CI: 3.33-10.05; p < .001) late after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve PPM is associated with higher postoperative pulmonary artery pressure and might impair perioperative and overall survival. The relation should be further assessed in properly designed studies.
OBJECTIVE: The hemodynamic effect and early and late survival impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after mitral valve replacement remains insufficiently explored. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English language original publications. The search yielded 791 potentially relevant studies. The final review and analysis included 19 studies compromising 11,675 patients. RESULTS: Prosthetic effective orifice area was calculated with the continuity equation method in 7 (37%), pressure half-time method in 2 (10%), and partially or fully obtained from referenced values in 10 (53%) studies. Risk factors for PPM included gender (male), diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, and the use of bioprostheses. When pooling unadjusted data, PPM was associated with higher perioperative (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.10; p < .001) and late mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.21-1.77; p < .001). Moreover, PPM was associated with higher late mortality when Cox proportional-hazards regression (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.57-2.47; p < .001) and propensity score (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.34-2.95; p < .001) adjusted data were pooled. Contrarily, moderate (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.84-1.22; p = .88) or severe (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.89-1.58; p = .24) PPM were not related to higher late mortality when adjusted data were pooled individually. PPM was associated with higher systolic pulmonary pressures (mean difference: 7.88 mmHg; 95% CI: 4.72-11.05; p < .001) and less pulmonary hypertension regression (OR: 5.78; 95% CI: 3.33-10.05; p < .001) late after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve PPM is associated with higher postoperative pulmonary artery pressure and might impair perioperative and overall survival. The relation should be further assessed in properly designed studies.
Authors: Stuart J Head; Mostafa M Mokhles; Ruben L J Osnabrugge; Philippe Pibarot; Michael J Mack; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Ad J J C Bogers; Arie Pieter Kappetein Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: William Y Shi; Cheng-Hon Yap; Philip A Hayward; Diem T Dinh; Christopher M Reid; Gilbert C Shardey; Julian A Smith Journal: Heart Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: W R Eric Jamieson; Eva Germann; Jian Ye; Florence Chan; Anson Cheung; Joan S MacNab; Guy J Fradet; Elizabeth A Stanford; Lucinda A Bryson; Samuel V Lichtenstein Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Buu-Khanh Lam; Vincent Chan; Paul Hendry; Marc Ruel; Roy Masters; Pierre Bedard; Bill Goldstein; Fraser Rubens; Thierry Mesana Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-04-27 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Anton Tomšič; Bardia Arabkhani; Jan W Schoones; Jonathan R G Etnel; Nina A Marsan; Robert J M Klautz; Meindert Palmen Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 1.778