Literature DB >> 16094283

Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines.

Moe R Lim1, Federico P Girardi, Sora C Yoon, Russel C Huang, Frank P Cammisa.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective chart and radiographic review of 122 pedicle screws placed with computerized stereotactic image-guidance into posterolateral fusion masses.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy rate of computerized stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement in previously fused lumbar spines. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Placement of pedicle screws into a previously fused lumbar spine is challenging. The normal anatomic landmarks used to determine the starting point and trajectory of the screws have either been removed or are obscured by the fusion mass. Computerized frameless stereotaxis provides precise intraoperative real time multiplanar image-guidance and may be valuable in this clinical situation.
METHODS: Computerized frameless stereotactic image-guidance was used to place pedicle screws into 78 consecutive patients with prior lumbar spine fusions. Postoperative computed tomography was available on 35 patients (231 screws). One hundred and twenty-two screws were placed into fusion masses. Pedicle cortical perforations were characterized by the direction (medial, inferior, lateral, or superior) and magnitude (in 2-mm increments) of perforation.
RESULTS: Five (4.1%) of the 122 pedicle screws placed into previously fused levels were found to have unintentional cortical violations. There were 1 superior (<2 mm), 1 medial (<2 mm), and 3 lateral perforations (<2, 4, and 6 mm). None of these perforations led to clinically apparent radicular pain or weakness. No pedicle screws required revision for malpositioning.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy rate of stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spine levels is 96%. Computerized stereotactic image-guidance may have particular application in situations in which posterior element anatomy is altered, such as in the presence of a prior fusion mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094283     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000171905.38459.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Thorsten Tjardes; Sven Shafizadeh; Dieter Rixen; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Eva S Steinhausen; Holger Baethis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques.

Authors:  J Silbermann; F Riese; Y Allam; T Reichert; H Koeppert; M Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The use of fusion mass screws in revision spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Stephen J Lewis; Ranganathan Arun; Andrew Bodrogi; David E Lebel; Sofia P Magana; Taylor E Dear; Chris Witiw
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery.

Authors:  Robert Green Watkins; Akash Gupta; Robert Green Watkins
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-08-06

7.  The surgical learning curve and accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using CT based computer-assisted navigation plus continuous electromyography monitoring - a retrospective review of 627 screws in 150 patients.

Authors:  Martin James Wood; Jason McMillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Electromagnetic navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery: results of a cadaveric study to evaluate percutaneous pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Justin F Fraser; Ron Von Jako; John A Carrino; Roger Härtl
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-03-01

9.  Transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine with a novel cannulated polyaxial screw system.

Authors:  Lutz Weise; Olaf Suess; Thomas Picht; Theodoros Kombos
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2008-10-13

10.  Position and complications of pedicle screw insertion with or without image-navigation techniques in the thoracolumbar spine: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Jinshan Tang; Ziqiang Zhu; Tao Sui; Dechao Kong; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2014-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.