Literature DB >> 20852232

Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules.

Hillary Schwarb1, Eric H Schumacher.   

Abstract

For nearly two decades, researchers have investigated spatial sequence learning in an attempt to identify what specifically is learned during sequential tasks (e.g., stimulus order, response order, etc.). Despite extensive research, controversy remains concerning the information-processing locus of this learning effect. There are three main theories concerning the nature of spatial sequence learning, corresponding to the perceptual, motor, or response selection (i.e., central mechanisms underlying the association between stimulus and response pairs) processes required for successful task performance. The present data investigate this controversy and support the theory that stimulus-response (S-R) rules are critical for sequence learning. The results from two experiments demonstrate that sequence learning is disrupted only when the S-R rules for the task are altered. When the S-R rules remain constant or involve only a minor transformation, significant sequence learning occurs. These data implicate spatial response selection as a likely mechanism mediating spatial sequential learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20852232     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.6.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  31 in total

1.  Motor learning of compatible and incompatible visuomotor maps.

Authors:  S T Grafton; J Salidis; D B Willingham
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.

Authors:  M Ziessler; D Nattkemper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Serial pattern learning by event observation.

Authors:  J H Howard; S A Mutter; D V Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Stimulus-specific sequence representation in serial reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-08

8.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning: a role for visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  12 in total

1.  Correlation and response relevance in sequence learning.

Authors:  Josephine Cock; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 2.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

4.  Action-effects enhance explicit sequential learning.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-16

5.  Unitization of route knowledge.

Authors:  Yaakov Hoffman; Amotz Perlman; Ben Orr-Urtreger; Joseph Tzelgov; Emmanuel M Pothos; Darren J Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-27

6.  Working memory capacity correlates with implicit serial reaction time task performance.

Authors:  J Bo; S Jennett; R D Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Quantifying transfer after perceptual-motor sequence learning: how inflexible is implicit learning?

Authors:  Daniel J Sanchez; Eric N Yarnik; Paul J Reber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-26

8.  Sequential motor learning transfers from real to virtual environment.

Authors:  Yuhi Takeo; Masayuki Hara; Yuna Shirakawa; Takashi Ikeda; Hisato Sugata
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Generalized lessons about sequence learning from the study of the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Hillary Schwarb; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

10.  Does consolidation of visuospatial sequence knowledge depend on eye movements?

Authors:  Daphné Coomans; Jochen Vandenbossche; Koen Homblé; Eva Van den Bussche; Eric Soetens; Natacha Deroost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.