Literature DB >> 26757135

Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes.

Michael W Holmes1,2, Talisin T Hammond1, Guinevere O U Wogan1, Rachel E Walsh1, Katie LaBarbera1, Elizabeth A Wommack1,3, Felipe M Martins1, Jeremy C Crawford1, Katya L Mack1, Luke M Bloch1, Michael W Nachman1.   

Abstract

Natural history collections provide an immense record of biodiversity on Earth. These repositories have traditionally been used to address fundamental questions in biogeography, systematics and conservation. However, they also hold the potential for studying evolution directly. While some of the best direct observations of evolution have come from long-term field studies or from experimental studies in the laboratory, natural history collections are providing new insights into evolutionary change in natural populations. By comparing phenotypic and genotypic changes in populations through time, natural history collections provide a window into evolutionary processes. Recent studies utilizing this approach have revealed some dramatic instances of phenotypic change over short timescales in response to presumably strong selective pressures. In some instances, evolutionary change can be paired with environmental change, providing a context for potential selective forces. Moreover, in a few cases, the genetic basis of phenotypic change is well understood, allowing for insight into adaptive change at multiple levels. These kinds of studies open the door to a wide range of previously intractable questions by enabling the study of evolution through time, analogous to experimental studies in the laboratory, but amenable to a diversity of species over longer timescales in natural populations.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental change; evolution; genomics; morphology; natural history collections; phenotypic change

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757135      PMCID: PMC4755843          DOI: 10.1111/mec.13529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  129 in total

1.  QTL linkage mapping of wing length in zebra finch using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms markers.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Bart Kempenaers; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Robert M Ewers; Raphael K Didham
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-01

3.  An examination of amphibian sensitivity to environmental contaminants: are amphibians poor canaries?

Authors:  Jacob L Kerby; Kathryn L Richards-Hrdlicka; Andrew Storfer; David K Skelly
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston.

Authors:  Daniel Primack; Carolyn Imbres; Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Peter Del Tredici
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  The genetics of migration on the move.

Authors:  Miriam Liedvogel; Susanne Akesson; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Reverse evolution of armor plates in the threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Jun Kitano; Daniel I Bolnick; David A Beauchamp; Michael M Mazur; Seiichi Mori; Takanori Nakano; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Genome dynamics during experimental evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Estimating selection coefficients in spatially structured populations from time series data of allele frequencies.

Authors:  Iain Mathieson; Gil McVean
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic architecture of contemporary adaptation to biotic invasions: quantitative trait locus mapping of beak reduction in soapberry bugs.

Authors:  Y Yu; Jose A Andrés
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Hybridization Capture Using RAD Probes (hyRAD), a New Tool for Performing Genomic Analyses on Collection Specimens.

Authors:  Tomasz Suchan; Camille Pitteloud; Nadezhda S Gerasimova; Anna Kostikova; Sarah Schmid; Nils Arrigo; Mila Pajkovic; Michał Ronikier; Nadir Alvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  40 in total

1.  The impact of prolonged frozen storage on the preparation quality of bird skins and skeletons in zoological collections.

Authors:  Jessica Martínez-Vargas; Laura Roqué; Irene Del Canto; José Carrillo-Ortiz; Carles Orta; Javier Quesada
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-04-20

2.  Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Emily K Meineke; T Jonathan Davies; Barnabas H Daru; Charles C Davis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Using insect natural history collections to study global change impacts: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Heather M Kharouba; Jayme M M Lewthwaite; Rob Guralnick; Jeremy T Kerr; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Using museum specimens to track morphological shifts through climate change.

Authors:  Heidi J MacLean; Matthew E Nielsen; Joel G Kingsolver; Lauren B Buckley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Museum specimens of terrestrial vertebrates are sensitive indicators of environmental change in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  C Jonathan Schmitt; Joseph A Cook; Kelly R Zamudio; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Phenotypes in phylogeography: Species' traits, environmental variation, and vertebrate diversification.

Authors:  Kelly R Zamudio; Rayna C Bell; Nicholas A Mason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.

Authors:  Deborah M Leigh; Charles B van Rees; Katie L Millette; Martin F Breed; Chloé Schmidt; Laura D Bertola; Brian K Hand; Margaret E Hunter; Evelyn L Jensen; Francine Kershaw; Libby Liggins; Gordon Luikart; Stéphanie Manel; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M Miller; Gernot Segelbacher; Sean Hoban; Ivan Paz-Vinas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  Fungal biodiversity and conservation mycology in light of new technology, big data, and changing attitudes.

Authors:  Lotus A Lofgren; Jason E Stajich
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 10.900

9.  Balancing selection and drift in a polymorphic salamander metapopulation.

Authors:  Sean T Giery; Marketa Zimova; Dana L Drake; Mark C Urban
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 10.  Museum specimens provide novel insights into changing plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Emily K Meineke; T Jonathan Davies
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.