Literature DB >> 26385980

The Genomic Impacts of Drift and Selection for Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Justin P Gerke1, Jode W Edwards2, Katherine E Guill3, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra4, Michael D McMullen5.   

Abstract

Although maize is naturally an outcrossing organism, modern breeding utilizes highly inbred lines in controlled crosses to produce hybrids. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's reciprocal recurrent selection experiment between the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and the Iowa Corn Borer Synthetic No. 1 (BSCB1) populations represents one of the longest running experiments to understand the response to selection for hybrid performance. To investigate the genomic impact of this selection program, we genotyped the progenitor lines and >600 individuals across multiple cycles of selection using a genome-wide panel of ∼40,000 SNPs. We confirmed previous results showing a steady temporal decrease in genetic diversity within populations and a corresponding increase in differentiation between populations. Thanks to detailed historical information on experimental design, we were able to perform extensive simulations using founder haplotypes to replicate the experiment in the absence of selection. These simulations demonstrate that while most of the observed reduction in genetic diversity can be attributed to genetic drift, heterozygosity in each population has fallen more than expected. We then took advantage of our high-density genotype data to identify extensive regions of haplotype fixation and trace haplotype ancestry to single founder inbred lines. The vast majority of regions showing such evidence of selection differ between the two populations, providing evidence for the dominance model of heterosis. We discuss how this pattern is likely to occur during selection for hybrid performance and how it poses challenges for dissecting the impacts of modern breeding and selection on the maize genome.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial selection; genetic drift; heterosis; maize; recurrent selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26385980      PMCID: PMC4649645          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.182410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Natalya Sharopova; William D Beavis; David Grant; Maria Katt; Deborah Blair; Arnel Hallauer
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement.

Authors:  Matthew B Hufford; Xun Xu; Joost van Heerwaarden; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Jer-Ming Chia; Reed A Cartwright; Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Kate E Guill; Shawn M Kaeppler; Jinsheng Lai; Peter L Morrell; Laura M Shannon; Chi Song; Nathan M Springer; Ruth A Swanson-Wagner; Peter Tiffin; Jun Wang; Gengyun Zhang; John Doebley; Michael D McMullen; Doreen Ware; Edward S Buckler; Shuang Yang; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux.

Authors:  Jer-Ming Chia; Chi Song; Peter J Bradbury; Denise Costich; Natalia de Leon; John Doebley; Robert J Elshire; Brandon Gaut; Laura Geller; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Michael Gore; Kate E Guill; Jim Holland; Matthew B Hufford; Jinsheng Lai; Meng Li; Xin Liu; Yanli Lu; Richard McCombie; Rebecca Nelson; Jesse Poland; Boddupalli M Prasanna; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Tingzhao Rong; Rajandeep S Sekhon; Qi Sun; Maud I Tenaillon; Feng Tian; Jun Wang; Xun Xu; Zhiwu Zhang; Shawn M Kaeppler; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Michael D McMullen; Edward S Buckler; Gengyun Zhang; Yunbi Xu; Doreen Ware
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  On the determination of recombination rates in intermated recombinant inbred populations.

Authors:  Christopher R Winkler; Nicole M Jensen; Mark Cooper; Dean W Podlich; Oscar S Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence.

Authors:  Olivier Tenaillon; Alejandra Rodríguez-Verdugo; Rebecca L Gaut; Pamela McDonald; Albert F Bennett; Anthony D Long; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genetic diversity among progenitors and elite lines from the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) maize population: comparison of allozyme and RFLP data.

Authors:  M M Messmer; A E Melchinger; M Lee; W L Woodman; E A Lee; K R Lamkey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Insights into the effects of long-term artificial selection on seed size in maize.

Authors:  Candice N Hirsch; Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Timothy M Beissinger; Steven R Eichten; Shweta Deshpande; Kerrie Barry; Michael D McMullen; James B Holland; Edward S Buckler; Nathan Springer; C Robin Buell; Natalia de Leon; Shawn M Kaeppler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila.

Authors:  Molly K Burke; Joseph P Dunham; Parvin Shahrestani; Kevin R Thornton; Michael R Rose; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome.

Authors:  Martin W Ganal; Gregor Durstewitz; Andreas Polley; Aurélie Bérard; Edward S Buckler; Alain Charcosset; Joseph D Clarke; Eva-Maria Graner; Mark Hansen; Johann Joets; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Michael D McMullen; Pierre Montalent; Mark Rose; Chris-Carolin Schön; Qi Sun; Hildrun Walter; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The pattern and distribution of deleterious mutations in maize.

Authors:  Sofiane Mezmouk; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  16 in total

1.  Genomic insights into historical improvement of heterotic groups during modern hybrid maize breeding.

Authors:  Chunhui Li; Honghui Guan; Xin Jing; Yaoyao Li; Baobao Wang; Yongxiang Li; Xuyang Liu; Dengfeng Zhang; Cheng Liu; Xiaoqing Xie; Haiyan Zhao; Yanbo Wang; Jingbao Liu; Panpan Zhang; Guanghui Hu; Guoliang Li; Suiyan Li; Dequan Sun; Xiaoming Wang; Yunsu Shi; Yanchun Song; Chengzhi Jiao; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Yu Li; Tianyu Wang; Haiyang Wang
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 17.352

2.  Improving genomic predictions with inbreeding and nonadditive effects in two admixed maize hybrid populations in single and multienvironment contexts.

Authors:  Morgane Roth; Aurélien Beugnot; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Julie B Fiévet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Assessment of breeding programs sustainability: application of phenotypic and genomic indicators to a North European grain maize program.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Simon Teyssèdre; Christina Lehermeier; Bruno Claustres; Stéphane Maltese; Stéphane Melkior; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genomic prediction with a maize collaborative panel: identification of genetic resources to enrich elite breeding programs.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Simon Teyssèdre; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Mitigation of inbreeding while preserving genetic gain in genomic breeding programs for outbred plants.

Authors:  Zibei Lin; Fan Shi; Ben J Hayes; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Omics-based hybrid prediction in maize.

Authors:  Matthias Westhues; Tobias A Schrag; Claas Heuer; Georg Thaller; H Friedrich Utz; Wolfgang Schipprack; Alexander Thiemann; Felix Seifert; Anita Ehret; Armin Schlereth; Mark Stitt; Zoran Nikoloski; Lothar Willmitzer; Chris C Schön; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Natural variation in teosinte at the domestication locus teosinte branched1 (tb1).

Authors:  Laura Vann; Thomas Kono; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Matthew B Hufford; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Complex patterns of local adaptation in teosinte.

Authors:  Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Matthew B Hufford; Sofiane Mezmouk; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Selection for silage yield and composition did not affect genomic diversity within the Wisconsin Quality Synthetic maize population.

Authors:  Aaron J Lorenz; Timothy M Beissinger; Renato Rodrigues Silva; Natalia de Leon
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  The Effects of Both Recent and Long-Term Selection and Genetic Drift Are Readily Evident in North American Barley Breeding Populations.

Authors:  Ana M Poets; Mohsen Mohammadi; Kiran Seth; Hongyun Wang; Thomas J Y Kono; Zhou Fang; Gary J Muehlbauer; Kevin P Smith; Peter L Morrell
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.