UNLABELLED: Although the search for the ideal bone substitute has been the focus of a large number of studies, autogenous bone is still the gold standard for the filling of defects caused by pathologies and traumas, and mainly, for alveolar ridge reconstruction, allowing the titanium implants installation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of autogenous bone graft incorporation process to surgically created defects in rat calvaria, using epifluorescence microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five adult male rats weighing 200-300 g were used. The animals received two 5-mm-diameter bone defects bilaterally in each parietal bone with a trephine bur under general anesthesia. Two groups of defects were formed: a control group (n=5), in which the defects were filled with blood clot, and a graft group (n=5), in which the defects were filled with autogenous bone block, removed from the contralateral defect. The fluorochromes calcein and alizarin were applied at the 7th and 30th postoperative days, respectively. The animals were killed at 35 days. RESULTS: The mineralization process was more intense in the graft group (32.09%) and occurred mainly between 7 and 30 days, the period labeled by calcein (24.66%). CONCLUSIONS: The fluorochromes showed to be appropriate to label mineralization areas. The interfacial areas between fluorochrome labels are important sources of information about the bone regeneration dynamics.
UNLABELLED: Although the search for the ideal bone substitute has been the focus of a large number of studies, autogenous bone is still the gold standard for the filling of defects caused by pathologies and traumas, and mainly, for alveolar ridge reconstruction, allowing the titanium implants installation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of autogenous bone graft incorporation process to surgically created defects in rat calvaria, using epifluorescence microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five adult male rats weighing 200-300 g were used. The animals received two 5-mm-diameter bone defects bilaterally in each parietal bone with a trephine bur under general anesthesia. Two groups of defects were formed: a control group (n=5), in which the defects were filled with blood clot, and a graft group (n=5), in which the defects were filled with autogenous bone block, removed from the contralateral defect. The fluorochromes calcein and alizarin were applied at the 7th and 30th postoperative days, respectively. The animals were killed at 35 days. RESULTS: The mineralization process was more intense in the graft group (32.09%) and occurred mainly between 7 and 30 days, the period labeled by calcein (24.66%). CONCLUSIONS: The fluorochromes showed to be appropriate to label mineralization areas. The interfacial areas between fluorochrome labels are important sources of information about the bone regeneration dynamics.
The rehabilitation of the stomatognathic system is of great importance as it associated
with the recovery of esthetic, functional and psychosocial recovery of the patients.
Otherwise, the lack of bone in the alveolar ridge is a great challenge for the
rehabilitation success. Although the search for the ideal bone substitute has been the
focus of a large number of studies[5,9,24], autogenous bone is still the gold standard[6,14] for the filling
of defects caused by pathologies and traumas[23] and mainly, for the alveolar ridges reconstruction, allowing the
titanium implants installation[2]. The
osteoinduction and osteoconduction properties, biocompatibility, and impossibility of
disease transmission are differential characteristics of the high success rates of
autogenous bone[26,28].Studies on bone reconstruction aim at improving the quality response and increasing new
bone formation, as well as accelerating this process[19]. The knowledge of bone regeneration dynamics in autogenous grafts
and their cellular and molecular mechanisms collaborates to these purposes, and allows
for the exchange between biology and clinics, thus reflecting in the success of
rehabilitation.Burchardt[4] (1983) introduced the term
"creeping substitution" to describe the process of autogenous bone graft incorporation.
More recently, Pacifici, et al.[16]
(2002) proposed a simplified model of bone regeneration in autogenous grafts. Initially,
the platelets present in the blood clot suffer a degranulation process and, within few
hours, they release growth factors and transforming factors. These factors stimulate the
onset of capillary regeneration, and bind to osteoblasts and stem cells, stimulating
cellular mitosis and deposition of osteoid substance. The lack of blood supply elicits a
cellular necroses response. After 3 days of graft implantation, it is possible to
observe the presence of first capillaries colonizing the graft. Macrophages are
attracted to the place where they proliferate and release more fibroblastic and
endothelial growing factors. After 3 days, there is a progressive deposition of osteoid
matrix. At 14 days, the local revascularization is completed and then the creeping
substitution process starts, with the grafted bone being progressively replaced by newly
formed bone. From the 4th to 6th week, mineralization occurs, resulting in an immature
and disorganized bone. Finally, the immature bone (woven bone) will be gradually
remodeled and resorbed, being replaced by a lamellar bone, according to the functional
and masticatory stimulus.Many methodologies have been used to observe the bone regeneration process[13,25]. The mineralization of the osteoid matrix constitutes an important
step of this process, and the observation of this phenomenon by epifluorescence
microscopy using fluorochromes may contribute to the evolution of bone regeneration
dynamics concept.Fluorochromes are fluorescent labels with calcium affinity, the most used being
alizarin, calcein and oxytetracycline. When different types of fluorochromes are
injected in the organism at different moments of ossification, they bind to the
available calcium that is precipitating in the mineralization areas. With the aid of
filters that catch specific wavelengths for each fluorochrome, it is possible to
visualize the mineralized areas in different colors for each period.Methodologies using fluorochromes have been more frequently used in bone biology
researches[7,12], and studies using fluorochromes to evaluate the
dynamics of autogenous bone grafts incorporation are needed. Therefore, aim of this
study was to evaluate the autogenous bone graft regeneration dynamics in surgically
created defects in rat calvaria, using epifluorescence microscopy. The possible
contributions of autogenous bone to bone defect regeneration were also investigated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical Principles for Animal
experimentation adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal experimentation (COBeA), have
been approved by the Animal experimentation ethics Committee of the Veterinary Medicine
Faculty of Araçatuba/UNeSP, Brazil.For the present study, 5 adult male Wistar rats (Rattus novergicus
albinus,) aged 3 to 4 months and weighing 200 to 300 g were used. The
animals received general anesthesia by the combination of ketamine hydrochloride
(Dopaser -Laboratórios Calier S.A. Barcelona, Spain) and xylazine hydrochloride
(Rompum; Bayer S.A. Saúde Animal, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil) intramuscularly. A
linear incision in an anterior-posterior direction was made in the median region of the
calvaria and the dermoperiostic was detached. Two 5-mm-diameter bone defects were
prepared with a trephine bur in each animal, being one in each parietal region. Two
groups of defects were formed: a control group (n=5), in which the defects were filled
with blood clot, and a graft group (n=5), in which the defects were filled with
autogenous bone block, removed from the contralateral defect (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1
Rat calvaria scheme in an upper view. The 5-mmdiameter surgical bone defects were
localized bilaterally at the parietal bones and were filled as illustrated
Figure 2
Surgical procedure. A) Surgical access. A linear incision in an anterior-posterior
direction was made in the median region of calvaria and the dermoperiostic was
detached. B) Trephine bur used to prepare the bone defects. C) The bone block
removed from the left side was positioned in the right side defect. D) An
approximate view of the defects to be filled
Rat calvaria scheme in an upper view. The 5-mmdiameter surgical bone defects were
localized bilaterally at the parietal bones and were filled as illustratedSurgical procedure. A) Surgical access. A linear incision in an anterior-posterior
direction was made in the median region of calvaria and the dermoperiostic was
detached. B) Trephine bur used to prepare the bone defects. C) The bone block
removed from the left side was positioned in the right side defect. D) An
approximate view of the defects to be filledThe fluorochromes calcein and alizarin (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA) were applied
intramuscularly at the 7th and 30th postoperative days, respectively, at a dose of 20
mg/kg body weight[17], as presented
schematically in Figure 3. The animals were killed
by anesthetic overdose at the 35th postoperative day.
Figure 3
Schematic presentation of the application of calcein (7th postoperative day) and
Alizarin (30th postoperative day) application (20 mg/kg body weight, IM)
Schematic presentation of the application of calcein (7th postoperative day) and
Alizarin (30th postoperative day) application (20 mg/kg body weight, IM)The pieces were processed according to the protocol described by Maniatopoulos, et
al.[11] (1986). After inclusion in
resin, blocks with the pieces were ground to a thickness of 150 µm (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Preparation of the 150-μm-thick sections. The arrows indicate the wear direction
to the center of the defect
Preparation of the 150-μm-thick sections. The arrows indicate the wear direction
to the center of the defectAn epifluorescence microscope (Leica Aristoplan, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany)
with specific filters for each fluorochrome was used for evaluation of the results.
Photomultiplicator filters of 488 nm wavelength for calcein and 594 nm wavelength for
alizarin were used. For image acquisition, a digital camera was coupled to the
epifluorescence microscope (Leica DFC 300 FX, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany),
whoch was connected to a computer (Pentium IV, Program IM 50 – Leica Microsystems,
Wetzlar, Germany). For standardization of the analysis, only the central region of the
defects was acquired (Figure 5). This criterion
was established considering the difficulty to visualize the whole extension of defect
with the alizarin filter in 4x increase and considering the low quality of image in this
magnification.
Figure 5
Standardization of the analyzed area. The square lines delimit the center of the
defect, selected to be the analyzed area. The yellow arrow show the block graft
and the white arrows show the boards of the defect
Standardization of the analyzed area. The square lines delimit the center of the
defect, selected to be the analyzed area. The yellow arrow show the block graft
and the white arrows show the boards of the defectIn each slide, two images were acquired, one labeled for calcein and one for alizarin.
The images were saved in a digital file. The acquired images were superimposed using the
Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA) (Figure 6) to illustrate the dynamics of bone
repair.
Figure 6
Image superposition scheme. The calcein and the alizarin images were superimposed
in a computer program to obtain the final studied images
Image superposition scheme. The calcein and the alizarin images were superimposed
in a computer program to obtain the final studied imagesIn the quantitative analysis, Imagelab 2000 software (Canborough, Wellandport, Ontario,
Canada) was used. Considering that the total area (TA) of the defect in the analyzed
regions may correspond to the area occupied by calvaria bone in the same region before
defect preparation, the TA was determined as follows: the defect that presented the
greater heigh of labeling in the lateral side of the image was established as the
pattern. From the most superior and the most inferior points of the labels in the
lateral board that presented a greater height, two parallel lines were traced towards
the other lateral board, forming a rectangle delimitating the TA (Figure 7a). The program calculation spreadsheet resource was used to
obtain the TA value (Figure 7b), considering that
the calvaria bone thickness was similar to all the animals included in the experiment.
The calceinlabeled regions (green) (Figure 8a) and
alizarinlabeled regions (red) (Figure 8b) were
delimited and the areas were calculated in pixels. Only the most intensively labeled
areas were considered (Figure 8). The TA was
considered as 100% and the percentage of each labeled area was calculated for each
group. Five percent values were obtained for each group (n=5) and averaged to obtain the
final value of mineralized area in each analyzed period. The mean values were analyzed
statistically by the t-test and Mann-Whitney test, using the Sigma Stat software,
version 3.1. (Systat Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)
Figure 7
Total area (TA) standardization. A) The dashed lines delimit the area; B) Imagelab
2000® program calculated the area in pixels
Figure 8
Calcein (A) and Alizarin (B) labeled areas delimited by dashed lines. (Imagelab
2000®)
Total area (TA) standardization. A) The dashed lines delimit the area; B) Imagelab
2000® program calculated the area in pixelsCalcein (A) and Alizarin (B) labeled areas delimited by dashed lines. (Imagelab
2000®)
RESULTS
The obtained images showed areas labeled in green and red that represent regions of
calcium precipitation, labeled by fluorochromes in different moments of tissue
mineralization. The calcein labeling (green) represents the regions where calcium
precipitated from the 7th to 30th day. The alizarin labeling (red) represents the
regions where calcium precipitated from the 30th to 35th days (Figures 9 and 10).
Figure 9
Fluorochrome-labeled areas in the Control Group. Three of five animals did not
show labeled areas (green = calcein ; red = alizarin)
Figure 10
Fluorochrome-labeled areas in the Graft Group. The five animals showed strong
labeled areas (green = calcein; red = alizarin)
Fluorochrome-labeled areas in the Control Group. Three of five animals did not
show labeled areas (green = calcein ; red = alizarin)Fluorochrome-labeled areas in the Graft Group. The five animals showed strong
labeled areas (green = calcein; red = alizarin)In the Control Group, the two animals presented images of isolated sites of
mineralization in the center of the defect. In the other 3 animals, labeling by
fluorochromes was not observed. The sites of mineralization presented similar
characteristics with areas intensely labeled mainly by calcein, in contrast with areas
of less intense labeling. Alizarin showed intense labeling, revealing a pattern of
laminar formation, covering the calcein labels and located mainly between this and the
periosteal surface (Figure 9).In the Graft Group, all the slices of this group showed significantly more calcein and
alizarin labeling than the Control Group. Otherwise, calcein (in green) presented
labeling sites with greater density and a tendency of bone formation in blocks. Alizarin
(in red) was characterized by less intense labeling with more laminar formation,
primarily in the periosteal surfaces, covering the calcein labels (Figure 10). The images revealed that one of the surfaces (periosteal
or dural) of the defects always showed more extensive and dense labels than the other,
primarily by calcein. The alizarin labels in these surfaces were always located
externally to those of calcein (Figure 10).Large areas with no fluorochrome label or with weak labels (which were not considered)
in the medullar region characterized this group (Figure
10), except for one slice, where the labels seems to be fused, forming a
single block in the periosteal surface (Figure
10E). Otherwise, in these areas, some spread mineralization sites were observed
(Figure 10).The thickest areas labeled with calcein seemed to be excavated with cavitations
apparently lined by alizarin labels. In some slices, projections seemed to be extending
from the alizarin labels, joining the cavitations (Figure
10C and Figure 10D).
DISCUSSION
Bone is a specialized mineralized connective tissue composed by 33% of organic matrix
(primarily collagen type I) and 67% of inorganic matrix (hydroxyapatite
crystals)[27].The incorporation of autogenous graft process involves the steps of induction,
revascularization, resorption, osteoid matrix production, mineralization and
remodeling[4]. Mineralization
involves numerous complex events that are not well understood. After osteoid matrix
deposition by osteoblasts, the collagen fibers of the matrix presents areas of cracks in
their molecules, where the calcium ions are linked to proteoglycans. Under enzymatic
action, phosphoproteins occupy the place of proteoglycans, initiating the precipitation
of calcium phosphate complex. This way, the formation of hydroxyapatite starts and the
hydroxyapatite crystals gradually occupies the areas of cracks, expanding between the
fibers and completely mineralizing the tissue[10].The action mechanism of fluorochromes is not well understood. Images obtained in the
Graft Group (Figure 10) suggest that these labels
link to calcium while it stays available in the osteoid matrix, before the formation of
hydroxyapatite crystals. Therefore, the fluorochromes would act only on the tissues
undergoing mineralization, not labeling already mineralized tissues. The absence of
labels over the graft surfaces reinforces this hypothesis.According to this autogenous bone graft incorporation process described, we may consider
the labeled areas as new bone formation areas, which are undergoing mineralization of
the osteoid matrix. Otherwise, care must be taken when the mineralization areas are
related to bone formation. Parfitt, et al.[18] (1990) concluded that the bone formation index calculated from the
labels of tetracycline fluorochrome is under estimated in 10% approximately. Some
factors may contribute to this discrepancy: the decline of the osteoblast activity
during the short period of life[18] may
weaken tetracycline fixation in the final of mineralization[7]; the areas of osteoid matrix that are not mineralized do
not retain sufficient amount of tetracycline to achieve the threshold of detection in
the epifluorescence microscopy technique[18]; and matrix synthesis and mineralization temporarily cease during
bone remodeling[7,12]. Although there is no study testing the discrepancy
between calcein and alizarin, it is suggested that these factors must be considered.According to Frost[7] (1983) and
considering the periods of application of labels and sacrifice, the calcein labels must
represent the areas that suffered mineralization between the 7th and
30th days, and the alizarin labels, the areas that mineralized between the
30th and 35th days, with the occurrence of areas of
superpositioning between the two labels. The results of quantitative analysis seems, at
least proportionally, in accordance to many published studies[20.22]. The quantity
of labels in the Graft Group (32.09%) showed a regenerative potential of autogenous
bone[4,28], and the weaker labels in the Control Group (2.68%) suggest a
critical size defect[1,3,8,21,29] (Figures 11 and 12).
Figure 11
Percentage reached by calcein and alizarin in relation to the total area (TA). (G
= Graft Group; C = Control Group). Results are expressed as mean ± standard
deviation
*Differs significantly from the Control group labeled by calcein (P = 0.008)
(Mann-Whitney Test)
**Differs significantly from the Graft Group labeled by calcein. (P = 0.008)
(Mann-Whitney Test)
*** Differs significantly from the Graft Group labeled by alizarin. (P =
<0.001) (T Test)
Figure 12
Sum of the areas labeled by calcein and alizarin in the Graft (G) and Control (C)
groups. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
* Differs significantly from the Control Group. (P < 0.001) (T Test)
Percentage reached by calcein and alizarin in relation to the total area (TA). (G
= Graft Group; C = Control Group). Results are expressed as mean ± standard
deviation*Differs significantly from the Control group labeled by calcein (P = 0.008)
(Mann-Whitney Test)**Differs significantly from the Graft Group labeled by calcein. (P = 0.008)
(Mann-Whitney Test)*** Differs significantly from the Graft Group labeled by alizarin. (P =
<0.001) (T Test)Sum of the areas labeled by calcein and alizarin in the Graft (G) and Control (C)
groups. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation* Differs significantly from the Control Group. (P < 0.001) (T Test)When the labels of two fluorochromes are compared, some factors must be considered.
O’Brien, et al.[15] (2002)classified the
fluorochromes according to their level of affinity to calcium. Alizarin was considered
as having the greatest affinity, followed by xylenol, blue calcein, calcein and
oxytetracycline. The predominance of calcein labels (24.66%) on alizarin labels (7.43%)
in the Graft Group possibly reflects the time of action for each label (calcein = 23
days, alizarin = 5 days). (Figures 11 and 12) If the mineralization occurred in the same
intensity during the evaluated period, and considering the greater affinity of calcium
to alizarin, we should have had a more intense label for this fluorochrome. As alizarin
caused more discrete labels, we can suppose that the greatest mineralization rate occurs
between the 7th and the 30th day, which is the period of calcein
action. However, it is not possible to determine the moment when mineralization started
and until which moment it occurred, since this process might have started before the
7th day and would continue after the 35th day, if the rats had not been
sacrificed,.The areas with more intense bright in calcein labels are the regions with greater
calcium precipitation. It is supposed that these are the areas where the mineralization
started. The limits regions where the calcein labels touch the alizarin labels,
represents the region where the mineralization occurred in the 30th day after
the graft implantation. After these considerations, it is possible to clearly see in
some images, nuclei of centrifugal mineralization in many sites of the graft (Figure 10A, 10B
and 10D).The features observed in the images and the more intense and dense label in one of the
surfaces of the defect (periosteal or dural) might be due to the position that the bone
block was placed in the defect, with the external cortical in direction to the
periosteal or dural surface. As no standardization of this sense was made at the moment
of surgery, and also by the difficulty imposed by the size of the obtained blocks, we
believe that the surface with greater label corresponds to the external cortical of the
bone block (Figure 10). The images indicate that
the mineralization initiates by the surfaces (periosteal or dural) of the grafts and by
sites of mineralization located in the medullar regions. These nuclei suggest an
osteoinduction activity of the autogenous graft.The regions of alizarin labels seems to be lining the cavities formed by the calcein
labels and sending projections linking the cavitations (Figures 10C and 10D), possibly
representing the formation of Havers and Volkmann channels, that shelter blood
capillaries. These structures that had their formation initiated in the calcein period
of action (between days 7 and 30) seem to become more mature after the 30th day.
CONCLUSION
The fluorochromes used in the present study appeared adequate to label mineralization
areas, and the interfacial areas between the labels of two fluorochromes revealed
important information about the dynamics of bone regeneration in regions grafted with
autogenous transplants. However, the obtained results cannot be extrapolated to the
clinical conditions, considering the differences in evolution, metabolism and dimensions
between man and rat. More studies are needed using more than two types of fluorochromes
with experimental models of metabolism more similar to that of humans, and with a longer
postoperative evaluation period.
Authors: R E Marx; E R Carlson; R M Eichstaedt; S R Schimmele; J E Strauss; K R Georgeff Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 1998-06
Authors: Ette S Tadjoedin; Gert L de Lange; D M Lyaruu; Luit Kuiper; Elisabeth H Burger Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Caroline Capuani; Jacques Rouquette; Bruno Payré; Jacques Moscovici; Marie Bernadette Delisle; Norbert Telmon; Céline Guilbeau-Frugier Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 2.686