Literature DB >> 12175381

High concentrations of bioactive glass material (BioGran) vs. autogenous bone for sinus floor elevation.

Ette S Tadjoedin1, Gert L de Lange, D M Lyaruu, Luit Kuiper, Elisabeth H Burger.   

Abstract

In this study, high concentrations of bioactive glass (BG) particles were compared with autogenous bone in their capacity to augment maxillary bone when grafted in the human sinus floor using a split mouth design. Three female patients with severe maxillary atrophy underwent bilateral sinus floor elevation and bone grafting using 80-100% BG particles (300-355 microm in size) mixed with 20% to 0% iliac crest bone particles at one (experimental) side, and 100% iliac crest derived bone particles at the other (control) side. A total of 22 bone biopsies was taken at the time of fixture installation; that is, at 4, 6 and 15 months after grafting, and processed for histology and histomorphometry. At the control (autogenous bone) sides, trabecular bone amounted to 39% of the biopsy volume in the graft (site) at 4 months, almost 41% at 6 months, and 42% at 15 months. This bone contained viable osteocytes and was mostly of mature, lamellar type. At the experimental (BG particles) sides, the graft consisted of 27% of mostly woven (and some lamellar) bone at 4 months, 36% (woven and lamellar) bone at 6 months, and 39% (mainly lamellar) bone at 15 months. The grafted BG particles started to excavate at 4 months and their centers gradually filled with bone tissue. As a consequence, the volume of BG particles in the biopsy decreased from 29% at 4 months to 15% at 6 months and 8% at 15 months. The BG particles appeared to resorb within 1-2 years by dissolution rather than by osteoclastic activity. Parameters for bone turnover (% osteoid surface, % resorption surface) indicated that bone remodeling was very active at both experimental and control sides, during more than 6 months. These results suggest that mixtures of mainly (80-90%) BG particles and some (10-20%) autogenous bone are effective for bone regeneration in the augmented sinus offer 6 months healing time, while about 12 months healing time is needed for 100% BG particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12175381     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130412.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  18 in total

1.  Review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Landon S Pryor; Earl Gage; Claude-Jean Langevin; Fernando Herrera; Andrew D Breithaupt; Chad R Gordon; Ahmed M Afifi; James E Zins; Hal Meltzer; Amanda Gosman; Steve R Cohen; Ralph Holmes
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

Review 2.  Bioactive-glass in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Corrado Profeta; Christoph Huppa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 3.  Application of bioactive glasses in various dental fields.

Authors:  Nazanin Jafari; Mina Seyed Habashi; Alireza Hashemi; Reza Shirazi; Nader Tanideh; Amin Tamadon
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Comparison of morbidity and complications of harvesting bone from the iliac crest and calvarium: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Fawzi Riachi; Nada Naaman; Carine Tabarani; Antoine Berberi; Ziad Salameh
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

5.  Preparation of resorbable carbonate-substituted hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres and their evaluation in osseous defects in vivo.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; B Sonny Bal; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Graftless sinus augmentation technique with contextual placement of implants: a case report.

Authors:  Nicolae Chipaila; Roberta Marini; Gian Luca Sfasciotti; Alessandro Cielo; Laura Bonanome; Annalisa Monaco
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-12-17

7.  Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Teresa Lombardi; Francesco Oreglia; Andrea Alberghini Maltoni; Tonino Traini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparing the Efficacy of Three Different Nano-scale Bone Substitutes: In vivo Study.

Authors:  Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Mansour Rismanchian; Nasim Jafari-Pozve; Saied Nosouhian
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-05-29

9.  Bone regeneration in surgically created defects filled with autogenous bone: an epifluorescence microscopy analysis in rats.

Authors:  Marcos Heidy Guskuma; Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira; Flávia Priscila Pereira; Idelmo Rangel-Garcia Junior; Roberta Okamoto; Tetuo Okamoto; Osvaldo Magro Filho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials.

Authors:  Jörg Handschel; Melani Simonowska; Christian Naujoks; Rita A Depprich; Michelle A Ommerborn; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.