Literature DB >> 6339139

The biology of bone graft repair.

H Burchardt.   

Abstract

Cancellous and cortical autografts histologically have three differences: (1) cancellous grafts are revascularized more rapidly and completely than cortical grafts; (2) creeping substitution of cancellous bone initially involves an appositional bone formation phase, followed by a resorptive phase, whereas cortical grafts undergo a reverse creeping substitution process; (3) cancellous grafts tend to repair completely with time, whereas cortical grafts remain as admixtures of necrotic and viable bone. Physiologic skeletal metabolic factors influence the rate, amount, and completeness of bone repair and graft incorporation. The mechanical strengths of cancellous and cortical grafts are correlated with their respective repair processes: cancellous grafts tend to be strengthened first, whereas cortical grafts are weakened. Bone allografts are influenced by the same immunologic factors as other tissue grafts. Fresh bone allografts may be rejected by the host's immune system. The histoincompatibility antigens of bone allografts are presumably the proteins or glycoproteins on cell surfaces. The matrix proteins may or may not elicit graft rejection. The rejection of a bone allograft is considered to be a cellular rather than a humoral response, although the humoral component may play a part. The degree of the host response to an allograft may be related to the antigen concentration and total dose. The rejection of a bone allograft is histologically expressed by the disruption of vessels, an inflammatory process including lymphocytes, fibrous encapsulation, peripheral graft resorption, callus bridging, nonunions, and fatigue fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6339139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  136 in total

1.  The effects of hydroxyapatite coating and bone allograft on fixation of loaded experimental primary and revision implants.

Authors:  Kjeld Søballe; Olivier R G Mouzin; Louis A Kidder; Søren Overgaard; Joan E Bechtold
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-06

2.  Healing of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts: an experimental rabbit model.

Authors:  S Mohammadi; L Rasmusson; L Göransson; L Sennerby; P Thomsen; K E Kahnberg
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Craniofacial Bone Grafting: Wolff's Law Revisited.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Lawrence Tong; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2008-11

4.  Bone regeneration in dentistry.

Authors:  Paolo Tonelli; Marco Duvina; Luigi Barbato; Eleonora Biondi; Niccolò Nuti; Leila Brancato; Giovanna Delle Rose
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-09

5.  Characterization of cortico-cancellous bone along the iliac crest: focus on graft harvesting.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

7.  Reconstruction of bone defects with impacted allograft in femoral stem revision surgery.

Authors:  Alberto Francés; Enrique Moro; Juan-Luis Cebrian; Fernando Marco; Antonio García-López; David Serfaty; Luis López-Durán
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputerized tomography study.

Authors:  Sebastian Kühl; Christoph Brochhausen; Hermann Götz; Andreas Filippi; Michael Payer; Bernd d'Hoedt; Matthias Kreisler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  [Analysis of the effectiveness of an internal hospital bone bank].

Authors:  M Flören; T Kappe; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Is a single anterolateral screw-plate fixation sufficient for the treatment of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction? A biomechanical in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Ulrich Schreiber; Tibor Bence; Thomas Grupp; Erwin Steinhauser; Thomas Mückley; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rudolf Beisse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.