Literature DB >> 11823929

Bone healing and bone substitutes.

Peter D Costantino1, David Hiltzik, Satish Govindaraj, Jason Moche.   

Abstract

With the advent of new biomaterials and surgical techniques, the reconstructive surgeon has a wider range of treatment modalities for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of craniofacial skeletal deformities than ever before. These innovative substances act as true bone graft substitutes, thereby allowing the surgeon to avoid the use of autogenous bone grafts and their associated donor site morbidity. Surgeons have long been interested in producing a composite graft that can heal faster by induction, incorporate with surrounding tissues, and be remodeled to resemble native bone. Currently, there are a host of bone graft substitutes available that vary in both their composition and properties. Craniomaxillofacial surgeons must therefore become comfortable with numerous biomaterials to best tailor the treatment for each patient individually. Ongoing investigations into the next phase of tissue engineering will continue to bring us closer to the ability to regenerate or replace bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11823929     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 0736-6825            Impact factor:   1.446


  12 in total

1.  Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; David G Genecov
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

2.  [Custom moldable hydroxyapatite collagen composite for repair of osseous defects].

Authors:  R Mai; A Reinsdorf; E Pilling; G Lauer; M Gelinsky; U Eckelt
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-01

3.  Sub-clinical dose of bone morphogenetic protein-2 does not precipitate rampant, sustained inflammatory response in bone wound healing.

Authors:  Zachary J Grey; R Nicole Howie; Emily L Durham; Sarah Rose Hall; Kristi L Helke; Martin B Steed; Amanda C LaRue; Robin C Muise-Helmericks; James J Cray
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  Current concepts of bone tissue engineering for craniofacial bone defect repair.

Authors:  Brian Alan Fishero; Nikita Kohli; Anusuya Das; John Jared Christophel; Quanjun Cui
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-18

5.  Collagen-hydroxyapatite composite enhances regeneration of calvaria bone defects in young rats but postpones the regeneration of calvaria bone in aged rats.

Authors:  Ion Tcacencu; Mikael Wendel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  In vitro osteogenesis on fluorcanasite glass-ceramic with three different chemical compositions.

Authors:  Jorge Luiz Jacob Liporaci; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Anthony Johnson; Richard van Noort; Valdemar Mallet da Rocha Barros
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  In vitro degradation behavior of chitosan based hybrid microparticles.

Authors:  A Champa Jayasuriya; Kristalyn J Mauch
Journal:  J Biomed Sci Eng       Date:  2011-05-17

8.  Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Neumann; Kevin Kevenhoerster
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

9.  Stem cells, growth factors and scaffolds in craniofacial regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Viktor Tollemar; Zach J Collier; Maryam K Mohammed; Michael J Lee; Guillermo A Ameer; Russell R Reid
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2015-10-17

10.  Effect of nano-hydroxyapatite coating on the osteoinductivity of porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Yongchun Zhou; Lihua Huang; Jun Liu; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.