Literature DB >> 1965154

The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials.

J O Hollinger1, J C Kleinschmidt.   

Abstract

Accuracy and reproducibility are the hallmarks of the scientific method. Too frequently, the scientific method is abandoned and short circuited. The development and eventual clinical application of dental and medical materials and devices requires strict adherence to scientific methodology. The development of new bone repair materials is no exception. A reliable, convenient, and scientifically sound evaluation system is available for testing new bone repair materials. Animal models that fulfill stringent testing criteria and analytical methodology for assessment are described in this review. Experimental design, surgical protocols, tissue preparation for quantitative histology and x-rays, and biochemical assessments are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1965154     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199001000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  91 in total

1.  Fractal analyses of osseous healing using tuned aperture computed tomography images.

Authors:  M K Nair; A Seyedain; R L Webber; U P Nair; N P Piesco; S Agarwal; M P Mooney; H G Gröndahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Tuned aperture computed tomography to evaluate osseous healing.

Authors:  M K Nair; A Seyedain; S Agarwal; R L Webber; U P Nair; N P Piesco; M P Mooney; H G Grondahl
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Correlation of tuned aperture computed tomography with conventional computed tomography for evaluation of osseous healing in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Madhu K Nair; Umadevi P Nair; Ali Seyedain; Robert Gassner; Nicholas Piesco; Mark Mooney; Sudhakar Ganta; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-08-02

Review 4.  Pre-clinical models for oral and periodontal reconstructive therapies.

Authors:  G Pellegrini; Y J Seol; R Gruber; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  Direct gene therapy for bone regeneration: gene delivery, animal models, and outcome measures.

Authors:  Gadi Pelled; Ayelet Ben-Arav; Colleen Hock; David G Reynolds; Cemal Yazici; Yoram Zilberman; Zulma Gazit; Hani Awad; Dan Gazit; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells regenerate bone in a critical-sized ulna segmental defect.

Authors:  Congji Wen; Hai Yan; Shibo Fu; Yunliang Qian; Danru Wang; Chen Wang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Tissue growth controlled by geometric boundary conditions: a simple model recapitulating aspects of callus formation and bone healing.

Authors:  F Dieter Fischer; Gerald A Zickler; John W C Dunlop; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Transplantation of engineered bone tissue using a rotary three-dimensional culture system.

Authors:  Miyoko Hidaka; George Nan-Chang Su; Joy Kuan-Hao Chen; Ken-ichi Mukaisho; Takanori Hattori; Gaku Yamamoto
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Effects of fibrin-binding oligopeptide on osteopromotion in rabbit calvarial defects.

Authors:  Ju-A Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Chong-Pyoung Chung; Yoon-Jeong Park
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  The biomaterial-mediated healing of critical size bone defects in the ovariectomized rat.

Authors:  S F Durão; P S Gomes; B J Colaço; J C Silva; H M Fonseca; J R Duarte; A C Felino; M H Fernandes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.