Literature DB >> 8481593

Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density.

H Young1, S Howey, D W Purdie.   

Abstract

Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) was investigated as an inexpensive, simple and radiation-free method of screening for low perimenopausal bone density. A total of 587 women (50-54 years), invited for screening had bone mineral density (BMD) measured at the femoral neck and the lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). At the same visit the BUA of the calcaneus was measured. The correlation between BUA and BMD was approximately 0.4 compared with 0.67 between femoral neck and spinal BMD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated BUA to have the same ability for discriminating between low BMD at either the femoral neck or lumbar spine. BUA with a cut-off for normality at the median (BUA = 80) had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 67% for low bone density identified by a BMD less than the 25th centile at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. The correlation between BUA and BMD was insufficient to allow identification of the same groups as having low bone density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8481593     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Measurements of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in the calcaneus in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R J Herd; T Ramalingham; P J Ryan; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone.

Authors:  J A Evans; M B Tavakoli
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

4.  Assessment of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis in vitro.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; S A Murray; D Charlesworth; C Miller; J Fordham; K Clifford; R Atkins; J A Kanis
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Comparison of speed of sound and ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis to bone density of the radius, femur and lumbar spine.

Authors:  P Rossman; J Zagzebski; C Mesina; J Sorenson; R Mazess
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1989-11

Review 6.  Involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Dose-response evaluation of cyclic estrogen/gestagen in postmenopausal women: placebo-controlled trial of its gynecologic and metabolic actions.

Authors:  M S Christensen; C Hagen; C Christiansen; I Transbøl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; M Towsley; R Lindsay; L Markhard; D Dempster
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Prediction of postmenopausal fracture risk with use of bone mineral measurements.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study.

Authors:  M A Hansen; K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-19
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; D Agnusdei; R Palmieri; S Rossi; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Heel Ultrasound Scan in Detecting Osteoporosis in Low Trauma Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Faiz R Hashmi; Khaled O Elfandi
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-06-27

3.  Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location.

Authors:  K Brooke-Wavell; P R Jones; D W Pye
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  A correlative study of ultrasound calcaneal and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements of the lumbar spine and femur in 1000 women.

Authors:  L Rosenthall; A Tenenhouse; J Caminis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

Review 5.  The clinical role of BUA for the assessment of osteoporosis: a new hypothesis.

Authors:  C M Langton
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus: in vivo results with a new device.

Authors:  P Laugier; B Fournier; G Berger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal ultrasound measurements with clinical criteria for bone densitometry (DEXA) referral.

Authors:  C M Langton; P A Ballard; D K Bennett; D W Purdie
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  [Osteosonography of the phalanges of men].

Authors:  T Soballa; J Schlegel; R Cadossi; R Isani; P Heilmann; R Ziegler; C Wüster
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

10.  A precise method for the assessment of tibial ultrasound velocity.

Authors:  J M Orgee; H Foster; E V McCloskey; S Khan; G Coombes; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.