Literature DB >> 20832023

Feasibility of dose reduction using novel denoising techniques for low kV (80 kV) CT enterography: optimization and validation.

Luís S Guimarães1, Joel G Fletcher, Lifeng Yu, James E Huprich, Jeff L Fidler, Armando Manduca, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, David R Holmes, Cynthia H McCollough.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to optimize and validate projection-space denoising (PSDN) strategies for application to 80-kV computed tomographic (CT) data to achieve 50% dose reduction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Image data obtained at 80 kV (mean CT dose index volume, 7.9 mGy) from dual-source, dual-energy CT enterographic (CTE) exams in 42 patients were used. For each exam, nine 80 kV image data sets were reconstructed using PSDN (three levels of intensity) with or without image-based denoising and compared to commercial reconstruction kernels. For optimization, qualitative analysis selected optimal denoising strategies, with quantitative analysis measuring image contrast, noise, and sharpness (full width at half maximum bowel wall thickness, maximum CT number gradient). For validation, two radiologists examined image quality, comparing low-dose 80-kV optimally denoised images to full-dose mixed-voltage images.
RESULTS: PSDN algorithms generated the best 80-kV image quality (41 of 42 patients), while the commercial kernels produced the worst (39 of 42) (P < .001). Overall, 80-kV PSDN approaches resulted in higher contrast (mean, 332 vs 290 Hounsfield units), slightly less noise (mean, 20 vs 26 Hounsfield units), but slightly decreased image sharpness (relative bowel wall thickness, 1.069 vs 1.000) compared to full-dose mixed-voltage images. Mean image quality scores for full-dose CTE images were 4.9 compared to 4.5 for optimally denoised half-dose 80-kV CTE images and 3.1 for nondenoised 80-kV CTE images (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Optimized denoising strategies improve the quality of 80-kV CTE images such that CT data obtained at 50% of routine dose levels approaches the image quality of full-dose exams.
Copyright © 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832023      PMCID: PMC2939058          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  21 in total

1.  Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit.

Authors:  J R Haaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.

Authors:  Marilyn J Siegel; Bernhard Schmidt; David Bradley; Christoph Suess; Charles Hildebolt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  CT images of abdomen and pelvis: effect of nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm on image quality and lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Stefania M R Rizzo; Mannudeep K Kalra; Bernhard Schmidt; Rainer Raupach; Michael M Maher; Michael A Blake; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Penalized-likelihood sinogram smoothing for low-dose CT.

Authors:  Patrick J La Rivière
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise.

Authors:  J Hsieh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  M Kachelriess; O Watzke; W A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakayama; Kazuo Awai; Yoshinori Funama; Masahiro Hatemura; Masanori Imuta; Takeshi Nakaura; Da Ryu; Shoji Morishita; Shamima Sultana; Natsuko Sato; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Michael A Blake; Brian C Lucey; Kelly Karau; Thomas L Toth; Gopal Avinash; Elkan F Halpern; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Correlation of patient weight and cross-sectional dimensions with subjective image quality at standard dose abdominal CT.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Srinivasa R Prasad; M Sikandar Hayat; Michael A Blake; Jose Varghese; Elkan F Halpern; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pilot multi-reader study demonstrating potential for dose reduction in dual energy hepatic CT using non-linear blending of mixed kV image datasets.

Authors:  Anja Apel; Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; David M Hough; Lifeng Yu; Luis S Guimaraes; Matthias E Bellemann; Cynthia H McCollough; David R Holmes; Christian D Eusemann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dose reduction in CT: the time is now.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography enterography with model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric Crohn's disease patients.

Authors:  Yeoun Joo Lee; Jae-Yeon Hwang; Hwaseong Ryu; Tae Un Kim; Yong-Woo Kim; Jae Hong Park; Ki Seok Choo; Kyung Jin Nam; Jieun Roh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging.

Authors:  S A Taylor; F Avni; C G Cronin; C Hoeffel; S H Kim; A Laghi; M Napolitano; P Petit; J Rimola; D J Tolan; M R Torkzad; M Zappa; G Bhatnagar; C A J Puylaert; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.