Jun Tan1, Jiantao Pu, Bin Zheng, Xingwei Wang, Joseph K Leader. 1. Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Division, University of Pittsburgh, 3362 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. tanj@upmc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) is the largest public CT image database of lung nodules. In this study, the authors present a comprehensive and the most updated analysis of this dynamically growing database under the help of a computerized tool, aiming to assist researchers to optimally use this database for lung cancer related investigations. METHODS: The authors developed a computer scheme to automatically match the nodule outlines marked manually by radiologists on CT images. A large variety of characteristics regarding the annotated nodules in the database including volume, spiculation level, elongation, interobserver variability, as well as the intersection of delineated nodule voxels and overlapping ratio between the same nodules marked by different radiologists are automatically calculated and summarized. The scheme was applied to analyze all 157 examinations with complete annotation data currently available in LIDC dataset. RESULTS: The scheme summarizes the statistical distributions of the abovementioned geometric and diagnosis features. Among the 391 nodules, (1) 365 (93.35%) have principal axis length < or =20 mm; (2) 120, 75, 76, and 120 were marked by one, two, three, and four radiologists, respectively; and (3) 122 (32.48%) have the maximum volume overlapping ratios -80% for the delineations of two radiologists, while 198 (50.64%) have the maximum volume overlapping ratios <60%. The results also showed that 72.89% of the nodules were assessed with malignancy score between 2 and 4, and only 7.93% of these nodules were considered as severely malignant (malignancy > or =4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LIDC contains examinations covering a diverse distribution of nodule characteristics and it can be a useful resource to assess the performance of the nodule detection and/or segmentation schemes.
PURPOSE: Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) is the largest public CT image database of lung nodules. In this study, the authors present a comprehensive and the most updated analysis of this dynamically growing database under the help of a computerized tool, aiming to assist researchers to optimally use this database for lung cancer related investigations. METHODS: The authors developed a computer scheme to automatically match the nodule outlines marked manually by radiologists on CT images. A large variety of characteristics regarding the annotated nodules in the database including volume, spiculation level, elongation, interobserver variability, as well as the intersection of delineated nodule voxels and overlapping ratio between the same nodules marked by different radiologists are automatically calculated and summarized. The scheme was applied to analyze all 157 examinations with complete annotation data currently available in LIDC dataset. RESULTS: The scheme summarizes the statistical distributions of the abovementioned geometric and diagnosis features. Among the 391 nodules, (1) 365 (93.35%) have principal axis length < or =20 mm; (2) 120, 75, 76, and 120 were marked by one, two, three, and four radiologists, respectively; and (3) 122 (32.48%) have the maximum volume overlapping ratios -80% for the delineations of two radiologists, while 198 (50.64%) have the maximum volume overlapping ratios <60%. The results also showed that 72.89% of the nodules were assessed with malignancy score between 2 and 4, and only 7.93% of these nodules were considered as severely malignant (malignancy > or =4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LIDC contains examinations covering a diverse distribution of nodule characteristics and it can be a useful resource to assess the performance of the nodule detection and/or segmentation schemes.
Authors: Joseph K Leader; Thomas E Warfel; Carl R Fuhrman; Sara K Golla; Joel L Weissfeld; Ricardo S Avila; Wesly D Turner; Bin Zheng Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Ted W Way; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Philip N Cascade; Ella A Kazerooni; Naama Bogot; Chuan Zhou Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Michael F McNitt-Gray; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Geoffrey McLennan; Richie C Pais; John Freymann; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Peyton H Bland; Gary E Laderach; Chris Piker; Junfeng Guo; Zaid Towfic; David P-Y Qing; David F Yankelevitz; Denise R Aberle; Edwin J R van Beek; Heber MacMahon; Ella A Kazerooni; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Samuel G Armato; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Anthony P Reeves; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan; Denise R Aberle; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R van Beek; David Yankelevitz; Eric A Hoffman; Claudia I Henschke; Rachael Y Roberts; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Richard C Pais; Christopher W Piker; David Qing; Masha Kocherginsky; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Robert A Ochs; Jonathan G Goldin; Fereidoun Abtin; Hyun J Kim; Kathleen Brown; Poonam Batra; Donald Roback; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Matthew S Brown Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2007-03-30 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Jason L Causey; Junyu Zhang; Shiqian Ma; Bo Jiang; Jake A Qualls; David G Politte; Fred Prior; Shuzhong Zhang; Xiuzhen Huang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 4.379