Literature DB >> 20827547

Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate.

D L Kendler1, M R McClung, N Freemantle, M Lillestol, A H Moffett, J Borenstein, S Satram-Hoang, Y-C Yang, P Kaur, D Macarios, S Siddhanti.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this study, 250 women with osteoporosis were randomized to 12 months with subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg every 6 months or oral alendronate 70 mg once weekly, then crossed over to the other treatment. The primary endpoint, treatment adherence at 12 months, was 76.6% for alendronate and 87.3% for denosumab.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment adherence with subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg every 6 months or oral alendronate 70 mg once weekly.
METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-year, crossover study, 250 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density received denosumab or alendronate for 12 months, then the other treatment for 12 months. The alendronate bottle had a medication event monitoring system cap to monitor administration dates. Definitions were as follows: compliance, receiving both denosumab doses 6 (± 1) months apart or 80-100% of alendronate doses; persistence, receiving both denosumab doses and completing the month 12 visit within the visit window or ≥ 2 alendronate doses in the final month; adherence, achieving both compliance and persistence. This report includes data from the first 12 months.
RESULTS: The primary study endpoint, adherence in the first 12 months, was 76.6% (95/124) for alendronate and 87.3% (110/126) for denosumab. Risk ratios for denosumab compared with alendronate at 12 months were 0.58 (p = 0.043) for non-adherence, 0.48 (p = 0.014) for non-compliance, and 0.54 (p = 0.049) for non-persistence. Subject ratings for treatment necessity, preference, and satisfaction were significantly greater for denosumab and ratings for treatment bother were significantly greater for alendronate. Adverse events were reported by 64.1% of alendronate-treated subjects and 72.0% of denosumab-treated subjects (p = 0.403). The most common adverse events were arthralgia, back pain, pain in extremity, cough, and headache (each in <10% of subjects in each group).
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly greater treatment adherence was observed for subcutaneous administration of denosumab every 6 months than for oral alendronate once weekly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20827547     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1378-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  37 in total

1.  Beliefs about antidepressant medications in primary care patients: relationship to self-reported adherence.

Authors:  Charlotte Brown; Deena R Battista; Richard Bruehlman; Susan S Sereika; Michael E Thase; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Osteoprotegerin and RANKL regulate bone resorption, density, geometry and strength.

Authors:  Paul J Kostenuik
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.547

3.  Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness.

Authors:  R Horne; J Weinman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Risedronate dosing before breakfast compared with dosing later in the day in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  D L Kendler; J D Ringe; L-G Ste-Marie; B Vrijens; E B Taylor; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Richard L Prince; Chad Deal; Robert R Recker; Douglas P Kiel; Luiz H de Gregorio; Peyman Hadji; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Jose M Alvaro-Gracia; Huei Wang; Matthew Austin; Rachel B Wagman; Richard Newmark; Cesar Libanati; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Doubts about necessity and concerns about adverse effects: identifying the types of beliefs that are associated with non-adherence to HAART.

Authors:  Robert Horne; Deanna Buick; Martin Fisher; Heather Leake; Vanessa Cooper; John Weinman
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized, crossover study (BALTO II).

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Helmut Minne; Michael Pfeifer; Pierre Bourgeois; Patrice Fardellone; Angelo Licata; Vipul Devas; Daiva Masanauskaite; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Preference and satisfaction with a 6-month subcutaneous injection versus a weekly tablet for treatment of low bone mass.

Authors:  D L Kendler; L Bessette; C D Hill; D T Gold; R Horne; S F Varon; J Borenstein; H Wang; H-S Man; R B Wagman; S Siddhanti; D Macarios; H G Bone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

Authors:  James A Simon; E Michael Lewiecki; Mary E Smith; Richard A Petruschke; Lixia Wang; Joanne J Palmisano
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 10.  Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  G A Wells; A Cranney; J Peterson; M Boucher; B Shea; V Robinson; D Coyle; P Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  33 in total

1.  Comparison of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Houchen Lyu; Bakr Jundi; Chang Xu; Sara K Tedeschi; Kazuki Yoshida; Sizheng Zhao; Sagar U Nigwekar; Benjamin Z Leder; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  A review of the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Paul D Miller
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 3.  Adjudication of osteonecrosis of the jaw in phase III randomized controlled trials of denosumab: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul de Boissieu; L Kanagaratnam; R Mahmoudi; A Morel; M Dramé; T Trenque
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; M Salas; D A Hughes; E Manias; F H Gwadry-Sridhar; P Linck; W Cowell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Denosumab: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Marit D Moen; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate--a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  P Hadji; V Ziller; D Gamerdinger; W Spieler; K Articus; M Baier; R Moericke; P H Kann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Effects of denosumab on bone density, mass and strength in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ove Törring
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 8.  Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Improved real-life adherence of 6-monthly denosumab injections due to positive feedback based on rapid 6-month BMD increase and good safety profile.

Authors:  J D Ringe; P Farahmand
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 10.  Denosumab compared to other treatments to prevent or treat osteoporosis in individuals at risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Beaudoin; S Jean; L Bessette; L-G Ste-Marie; L Moore; J P Brown
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.