SUMMARY: The ROSE study compared annual infusion with zoledronic acid and weekly generic alendronate. No significant differences in quality of life or health status between treatment groups were observed. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. INTRODUCTION: A secondary analysis to evaluate quality of life, health status, adherence to alendronate and therapy preference in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who received treatment withzoledronic acid or alendronate was conducted. METHODS:Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomised 2:1 to receive an annual infusion of zoledronic acid or weekly oral generic alendronate in this open-label, multicentre study. Changes in quality of life and health status were assessed using questionnaires at baseline and month 12. Adherence to alendronate was assessed by the investigator and/or study personnel, and subjective therapy preference was assessed using a questionnaire at month 12. RESULTS: Patients were randomised to zoledronic acid (n = 408) and alendronate (n = 191). Overall, there were no significant differences in quality of life between zoledronic acid and alendronate. However, improvements in quality of life with zoledronic acid versus alendronate could be detected by posthoc analysis in patients with previous fractures. There were no significant differences in health status between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. A total of 81% of patients who had received zoledronic acid indicated that they would prefer to continue with that treatment, and 43% of the patients who received oral alendronate would like to switch to zoledronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate.
RCT Entities:
SUMMARY: The ROSE study compared annual infusion with zoledronic acid and weekly generic alendronate. No significant differences in quality of life or health status between treatment groups were observed. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. INTRODUCTION: A secondary analysis to evaluate quality of life, health status, adherence to alendronate and therapy preference in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who received treatment with zoledronic acid or alendronate was conducted. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomised 2:1 to receive an annual infusion of zoledronic acid or weekly oral generic alendronate in this open-label, multicentre study. Changes in quality of life and health status were assessed using questionnaires at baseline and month 12. Adherence to alendronate was assessed by the investigator and/or study personnel, and subjective therapy preference was assessed using a questionnaire at month 12. RESULTS:Patients were randomised to zoledronic acid (n = 408) and alendronate (n = 191). Overall, there were no significant differences in quality of life between zoledronic acid and alendronate. However, improvements in quality of life with zoledronic acid versus alendronate could be detected by posthoc analysis in patients with previous fractures. There were no significant differences in health status between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. A total of 81% of patients who had received zoledronic acid indicated that they would prefer to continue with that treatment, and 43% of the patients who received oral alendronate would like to switch to zoledronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate.
Authors: P Hadji; D Gamerdinger; W Spieler; P H Kann; H Loeffler; K Articus; R Möricke; V Ziller Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-03-26 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Dennis Black; Steven Boonen; Steven R Cummings; Peter Mesenbrink; Lisa Palermo; Zulema Man; Peyman Hadji; Ian R Reid Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dennis M Black; Pierre D Delmas; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Steven Boonen; Jane A Cauley; Felicia Cosman; Péter Lakatos; Ping Chung Leung; Zulema Man; Carlos Mautalen; Peter Mesenbrink; Huilin Hu; John Caminis; Karen Tong; Theresa Rosario-Jansen; Joel Krasnow; Trisha F Hue; Deborah Sellmeyer; Erik Fink Eriksen; Steven R Cummings Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexandra Papaioannou; Nancy Santesso; Suzanne N Morin; Sidney Feldman; Jonathan D Adachi; Richard Crilly; Lora M Giangregorio; Susan Jaglal; Robert G Josse; Sharon Kaasalainen; Paul Katz; Andrea Moser; Laura Pickard; Hope Weiler; Susan Whiting; Carly J Skidmore; Angela M Cheung Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: P Hadji; N Papaioannou; E Gielen; M Feudjo Tepie; E Zhang; I Frieling; P Geusens; P Makras; H Resch; G Möller; L Kalouche-Khalil; A Fahrleitner-Pammer Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Karen Kaiser; Susan E Yount; Christa E Martens; Kimberly A Webster; Sara Shaunfield; Amy Sparling; John Devin Peipert; David Cella; Scott T Rottinghaus; Bonnie M K Donato; Richard Wells; Ioannis Tomazos Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 2.711