Paul de Boissieu1,2, L Kanagaratnam3,4, R Mahmoudi3,5, A Morel6, M Dramé3,4, T Trenque6,3. 1. Regional Center for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Reims University Hospital, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France. pdeboissieu@chu-reims.fr. 2. Faculty of Medicine, EA 3797, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France. pdeboissieu@chu-reims.fr. 3. Faculty of Medicine, EA 3797, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France. 4. Department of Research and Innovation, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France. 5. Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France. 6. Regional Center for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Reims University Hospital, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Denosumab (an anti RANKL antibody) is known to be associated with an increased risk for osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Due to the variety of clinical presentation, many ONJ definitions are used. Evaluation of ONJ's frequency during phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial to assess benefit-risk ratio. We verified that phase III RCTs involving denosumab reported the definition of ONJ used. METHODS: We systematically searched in Central, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus, until 31 August 2015. We included original phase III RCTs, involving denosumab. Post hoc analysis and trial extension were excluded. Articles that did not mention ONJ in their methods or results were excluded. The primary outcome was the prevalence of a complete definition of ONJ. When no definition was provided, ONJ adjudication process was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 313 articles found, 13 RCTs were included. A definition of ONJ was detailed in two RCTs (15%). For the remaining 11 RCTs, adjudication process was mentioned for nine. In those processes, "blinded," "expert," and "independent" were the most used words. CONCLUSION: Most of the published phase III RCTs involving denosumab did not specify the definition of ONJ used to adjudicate events in the study. Instead of definition, non-scientific and non-reproducible expressions were used. Because the chosen definition could impact the ONJ estimated frequency, it should be mandatory to give the precise definition used in each RCT publication involving denosumab.
PURPOSE:Denosumab (an anti RANKL antibody) is known to be associated with an increased risk for osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Due to the variety of clinical presentation, many ONJ definitions are used. Evaluation of ONJ's frequency during phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial to assess benefit-risk ratio. We verified that phase III RCTs involving denosumab reported the definition of ONJ used. METHODS: We systematically searched in Central, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus, until 31 August 2015. We included original phase III RCTs, involving denosumab. Post hoc analysis and trial extension were excluded. Articles that did not mention ONJ in their methods or results were excluded. The primary outcome was the prevalence of a complete definition of ONJ. When no definition was provided, ONJ adjudication process was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 313 articles found, 13 RCTs were included. A definition of ONJ was detailed in two RCTs (15%). For the remaining 11 RCTs, adjudication process was mentioned for nine. In those processes, "blinded," "expert," and "independent" were the most used words. CONCLUSION: Most of the published phase III RCTs involving denosumab did not specify the definition of ONJ used to adjudicate events in the study. Instead of definition, non-scientific and non-reproducible expressions were used. Because the chosen definition could impact the ONJ estimated frequency, it should be mandatory to give the precise definition used in each RCT publication involving denosumab.
Entities:
Keywords:
Denosumab; Osteonecrosis of the jaw; Pharmacovigilance; Safety
Authors: D L Kendler; M R McClung; N Freemantle; M Lillestol; A H Moffett; J Borenstein; S Satram-Hoang; Y-C Yang; P Kaur; D Macarios; S Siddhanti Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Salvatore L Ruggiero; Thomas B Dodson; Leon A Assael; Regina Landesberg; Robert E Marx; Bhoomi Mehrotra Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Sundeep Khosla; David Burr; Jane Cauley; David W Dempster; Peter R Ebeling; Dieter Felsenberg; Robert F Gagel; Vincente Gilsanz; Theresa Guise; Sreenivas Koka; Laurie K McCauley; Joan McGowan; Marc D McKee; Suresh Mohla; David G Pendrys; Lawrence G Raisz; Salvatore L Ruggiero; David M Shafer; Lillian Shum; Stuart L Silverman; Catherine H Van Poznak; Nelson Watts; Sook-Bin Woo; Elizabeth Shane Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Chris Recknor; Edward Czerwinski; Henry G Bone; Sydney L Bonnick; Neil Binkley; Santiago Palacios; Alfred Moffett; Suresh Siddhanti; Irene Ferreira; Prayashi Ghelani; Rachel B Wagman; Jesse W Hall; Michael A Bolognese; Claude-Laurent Benhamou Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: F Saad; J E Brown; C Van Poznak; T Ibrahim; S M Stemmer; A T Stopeck; I J Diel; S Takahashi; N Shore; D H Henry; C H Barrios; T Facon; F Senecal; K Fizazi; L Zhou; A Daniels; P Carrière; R Dansey Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 32.976