Literature DB >> 18069036

Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized, crossover study (BALTO II).

Peyman Hadji1, Helmut Minne, Michael Pfeifer, Pierre Bourgeois, Patrice Fardellone, Angelo Licata, Vipul Devas, Daiva Masanauskaite, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patient preference strongly influences long-term medication use in chronic diseases such as postmenopausal osteoporosis.
METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, crossover, international study randomized 350 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis to monthly oral ibandronate 150mg for 3months followed by weekly alendronate 70mg for 12weeks, or vice versa.
RESULTS: Of patients expressing a preference (93.1%), more preferred the monthly ibandronate regimen (70.6%) than the weekly alendronate regimen (29.4%). The monthly ibandronate preference rate was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The most common reasons for ibandronate preference were ease of staying on treatment long-term (81.5%) and better lifestyle fit (75.4%). More women found the monthly ibandronate regimen more convenient (76.6%) than the weekly alendronate regimen (23.4%). The monthly ibandronate convenience rate was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The safety profiles of the two regimens were similar.
CONCLUSION: The strong patient preference for monthly ibandronate over weekly alendronate replicates previous study findings and may lead to improved treatment adherence in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18069036     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  28 in total

1.  Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate.

Authors:  D L Kendler; M R McClung; N Freemantle; M Lillestol; A H Moffett; J Borenstein; S Satram-Hoang; Y-C Yang; P Kaur; D Macarios; S Siddhanti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Monthly or weekly bisphosphonate? Evaluation of satisfaction in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using OPSAT-Q questionnaire during the BOOSTER study in Croatia.

Authors:  Tonko Vlak; Darko Kaštelan; Petar Lozo; Jure Aljinović; Marina Gradišer; Sime Mijić; Tatjana Nikolić; Blaženka Miškić; Dolores Car; Gordana Tajšić; Tina Dušek; Zrinka Jajić; Frane Grubišić; Tamara Poljičanin; Miro Bakula; Feđa Džubur; Matilda Strižak-Ujević; Mira Kadojić; Maja Radman; Maja Vugrinec; Zeljka Kuster; Marijeta Pekez; Endi Radović; Ljubica Labar; Zeljka Crnčević-Orlić; Mirko Koršić
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Adaptation to microgravity, deconditioning, and countermeasures.

Authors:  Kunihiko Tanaka; Naoki Nishimura; Yasuaki Kawai
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study: results of a randomised, multicentre trial comparing the effect of zoledronic acid or alendronate on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  P Hadji; D Gamerdinger; W Spieler; P H Kann; H Loeffler; K Articus; R Möricke; V Ziller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009.

Authors:  S Lee; P Glendenning; C A Inderjeeth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Treatment satisfaction and persistence among postmenopausal women on osteoporosis medications: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US™.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; S W Wade; T P Do; S Satram-Hoang; R Stewart; G Gao; D Macarios
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study: real-world adherence and persistence to medication, efficacy, and safety, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Hadji; D Felsenberg; M Amling; L C Hofbauer; J A Kandenwein; A Kurth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Ibandronate: a review of its use in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Preference and satisfaction with a 6-month subcutaneous injection versus a weekly tablet for treatment of low bone mass.

Authors:  D L Kendler; L Bessette; C D Hill; D T Gold; R Horne; S F Varon; J Borenstein; H Wang; H-S Man; R B Wagman; S Siddhanti; D Macarios; H G Bone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Comparison of monthly ibandronate versus weekly risedronate in preference, convenience, and bone turnover markers in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Authors:  Yoon-Sok Chung; Sung-Kil Lim; Ho-Yeon Chung; In-Kyu Lee; Il-Hyung Park; Ghi-Su Kim; Yong-Ki Min; Moo-Il Kang; Dong-Jin Chung; Yong-Ki Kim; Woong Hwan Choi; Min Ho Shong; Ji-Hyun Park; Dong-Won Byun; Hyun-Koo Yoon; Chan Soo Shin; Yil-Seob Lee; Nam-Hee Kwon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.