Literature DB >> 20827488

Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort.

Ramzi Rajab1, Gabrielle Fisher, Michael W Kattan, Christopher S Foster, Tim Oliver, Henrik Møller, Victor Reuter, Peter Scardino, Jack Cuzick, Daniel M Berney.   

Abstract

The optimal method for measuring cancer extent in prostate biopsy specimens is unknown. Seven hundred forty-four patients diagnosed between 1990 and 1996 with prostate cancer and managed conservatively were identified. The clinical end point was death from prostate cancer. The extent of cancer was measured in terms of number of cancer cores (NCC), percentage of cores with cancer (PCC), total length of cancer (LCC) and percentage length of cancer in the cores (PLC). These were correlated with prostate cancer mortality, in univariate and multivariate analysis including Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). All extent of cancer variables were significant predictors of prostate cancer death on univariate analysis: NCC, hazard ration (HR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.28, P = 0.011; PPC, HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02, P < 0.0001; LCC, HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03, P = 0.002; PLC, HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02, P = 0.0001. In multivariate analysis including Gleason score and baseline PSA, PCC and PLC were both independently significant P = 0.004 and P = 0.012, respectively, and added further information to that provided by PSA and Gleason score, whereas NNC and LCC were no longer significant (P = 0.5 and P = 0.3 respectively). In a final model, including both extent of cancer variables, PCC was the stronger, adding more value than PLC (χ² (1df) = 7.8, P = 0.005, χ² (1df) = 0.5, P = 0.48 respectively). Measurements of disease burden in needle biopsy specimens are significant predictors of prostate-cancer-related death. The percentage of positive cores appeared the strongest predictor and was stronger than percentage length of cancer in the cores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20827488      PMCID: PMC3853376          DOI: 10.1007/s00428-010-0971-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  44 in total

1.  Systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Georg C Hutterer; Andrea Gallina; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrea Salonia; Vincenzo Scattoni; Luc Valiquette; Francesco Montorsi; Patrizio Rigatti; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Systematic sextant biopsies improve preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S Conrad; M Graefen; U Pichlmeier; R P Henke; P G Hammerer; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The early detection of prostate carcinoma with prostate specific antigen: the Washington University experience.

Authors:  D S Smith; P A Humphrey; W J Catalona
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Differences in histopathological and biochemical outcomes in patients with low Gleason score prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hendrik Isbarn; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Sascha A Ahyai; Felix K H Chun; Claudio Jeldres; Alexander Haese; Hans Heinzer; Mario Zacharias; Roman Heuer; Christian Eichelberg; Thomas Steuber; Lars Budäus; Jens Köllermann; Georg Salomon; Thorsten Schlomm; Paul Perrotte; Margit Fisch; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Predictors of metastatic disease in men with biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Onisuru T Okotie; William J Aronson; Jeff A Wieder; Yen Liao; Fred Dorey; Jean B DeKERNION; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Martha K Terris; George S Csathy; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Joseph C Presti; Frederick Dorey; William J Aronson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The role of biopsy core number in selecting prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Evanguelos Xylinas; Laurent Salomon; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal, examination prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies.

Authors:  H Huland; P Hammerer; R P Henke; E Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Sextant prostate biopsies. A histopathologic correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  P A Peller; D C Young; D P Marmaduke; W L Marsh; R A Badalament
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variation in reporting of cancer extent and benign histology in prostate biopsies among European pathologists.

Authors:  D M Berney; F Algaba; P Camparo; E Compérat; D Griffiths; G Kristiansen; A Lopez-Beltran; R Montironi; M Varma; L Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zanetti; Renata Zelic; Francesca Giunchi; Jonna Fridfeldt; Jessica Carlsson; Sabina Davidsson; Luca Lianas; Cecilia Mascia; Daniela Zugna; Luca Molinaro; Per Henrik Vincent; Ove Andrén; Lorenzo Richiardi; Olof Akre; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Andreas Pettersson
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Prognostic value of PTEN loss in men with conservatively managed localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Cuzick; Z H Yang; G Fisher; E Tikishvili; S Stone; J S Lanchbury; N Camacho; S Merson; D Brewer; C S Cooper; J Clark; D M Berney; H Møller; P Scardino; Z Sangale
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.