Literature DB >> 19751264

Differences in histopathological and biochemical outcomes in patients with low Gleason score prostate cancer.

Hendrik Isbarn1, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Sascha A Ahyai, Felix K H Chun, Claudio Jeldres, Alexander Haese, Hans Heinzer, Mario Zacharias, Roman Heuer, Christian Eichelberg, Thomas Steuber, Lars Budäus, Jens Köllermann, Georg Salomon, Thorsten Schlomm, Paul Perrotte, Margit Fisch, Hartwig Huland, Markus Graefen.   

Abstract

STUDY TYPE: Diagnosis (case series). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether the number or percentage of positive biopsy cores can be used to discriminate between patients with prostate cancer of a favourable and less favourable Gleason score (GS) < or =3 + 3, as prognostically, not all GS 3 + 3 prostate cancers are the same. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1106 consecutive patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and a biopsy GS of < or =3 + 3 or 3 + 4 had an open radical prostatectomy. The number of positive biopsy cores (< or =2 vs > or =3) were stratified into low- vs high-risk groups. Subsequently, we stratified patients according to the GS and the percentage of positive biopsy cores (<50% vs > or =50%). The pathological stage and the 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates were examined in univariable and multivariable models.
RESULTS: Based on the number of positive cores, the rate of extraprostatic disease was 11.7% and 23.3%, respectively, in the low-and high-risk GS < or =3 + 3 groups (P < 0.001). The 5-year BCR-free survival rates were 95.0%, 77.8%, 81.2% and 66.5% for, respectively, low- and high-risk GS < or =3 + 3 and for low- and high-risk GS 3 + 4 patients. Univariable and multivariable intergroup BCR rate differences were statistically significant between low- vs high-risk GS 3 + 3 patients (P < 0.001), but not significant between high-risk GS < or =3 + 3 vs low-risk GS 3 + 4 patients (P = 0.6). Comparable results were obtained when comparisons were made according to the percentage of positive biopsy cores.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results corroborate the finding that not all patients with a biopsy GS of < or =3 + 3 prostate cancer have low-risk disease. High-risk GS < or =3 + 3 patients have a similar risk profile as more favourable GS 3 + 4 patients. This finding warrants consideration when deciding on treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19751264     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08841.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between upgraded pathologic Gleason score 3 + 4 and non-upgraded 3 + 4 prostate cancer among patients who are candidates for active surveillance.

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Ramzi Rajab; Gabrielle Fisher; Michael W Kattan; Christopher S Foster; Tim Oliver; Henrik Møller; Victor Reuter; Peter Scardino; Jack Cuzick; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Daniel Ringli; Jens Tonhauser; Immanuel Poser; Jürgen Breul; Heidrun Gevensleben; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.