Literature DB >> 7529129

Sextant prostate biopsies. A histopathologic correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

P A Peller1, D C Young, D P Marmaduke, W L Marsh, R A Badalament.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, preoperative prediction of tumor volume and pathologic stage has been unreliable. This study examines the application of transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies to predict the extent of disease.
METHODS: One hundred and two patients with clinically resectable prostate cancer were evaluated by systematic sextant biopsies. Radical prostatectomy specimens were embedded totally as whole mounts, tumor areas were outlined, and volume was measured using a digital scanner. The number of positive sextant biopsies was compared with age, race, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, DNA ploidy, pathologic stage, capsular and seminal vesicle involvement, prostate and tumor volume, and Gleason score. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine if pathologic stage or tumor size could be predicted by these parameters.
RESULTS: The number of positive sextant biopsies correlated with traditional prognostic indicators. When patients with three or fewer positive biopsies were compared with those with four or more positive sextant biopsies, significant differences were identified relative to preoperative PSA (P < 0.001), tumor volume (P < 0.001), pathologic stage (P < 0.001), Gleason score (P < 0.001), seminal vesicle involvement (P < 0.001), and capsular penetration (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences based on age, race, DNA ploidy, and overall prostate volume. Logistic regression showed that patients with four or more positive sextant biopsies and high Gleason score had a greater likelihood of pT3 classification. Likewise, the probabilities of a tumor volume less than 0.5 ml could be predicted by the number of positive sextant biopsies and PSA alone. The number of positive sextant biopsies was the only factor that could predict a tumor volume greater than 4.0 ml.
CONCLUSION: The number of positive sextant biopsies appears to be an important prognostic indicator of pathologic (pT) classification and tumor volume. This information is valuable in selecting the treatment strategy for patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7529129     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950115)75:2<530::aid-cncr2820750216>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy tissue.

Authors:  M Cecchi; R Minervini; C A Sepich; C Ippolito; G L Pagni; D Summonti; A Di Benedetto; L Fiorentini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Biopsy diagnosis of prostatic cancer--current areas of concern.

Authors:  M R Feneley; M C Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  The Gordon Wilson Lecture. Natural history and treatment of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  P T Scardino
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2000

Review 5.  Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  M C Beduschi; R Beduschi; J E Oesterling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Ramzi Rajab; Gabrielle Fisher; Michael W Kattan; Christopher S Foster; Tim Oliver; Henrik Møller; Victor Reuter; Peter Scardino; Jack Cuzick; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Prostate Cancer - Old Problems and New Approaches. (Part II. Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers, Pathology and Biological Aspects).

Authors:  Kenneth V Honn; Amer Aref; Yong Q Chen; Michael L Cher; John D Crissman; Jeffrey D Forman; Xiang Gao; David Grignon; Maha Hussain; Arthur T Porter; Edson J Pontes; Bruce Redman; Wael Sakr; Richard Severson; Dean G Tang; David P Wood
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 8.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  Saturation biopsy protocol enhances prediction of pT3 and surgical margin status on prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Aurélien Descazeaud; Mark Rubin; Stéphanie Chemama; Stéphane Larré; Laurent Salomon; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; René Yiou; Dominique Chopin; Claude Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Masahiro Yashi; Akinori Nukui; Yuumi Tokura; Kohei Takei; Issei Suzuki; Kazumasa Sakamoto; Hideo Yuki; Tsunehito Kambara; Hironori Betsunoh; Hideyuki Abe; Yoshitatsu Fukabori; Yoshimasa Nakazato; Yasushi Kaji; Takao Kamai
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.