Literature DB >> 15126788

Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen.

Stephen J Freedland1, Martha K Terris, George S Csathy, Christopher J Kane, Christopher L Amling, Joseph C Presti, Frederick Dorey, William J Aronson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a preoperative model to risk stratify patients for prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure following radical prostatectomy (RP) and identify those at high risk who would be potential candidates for neoadjuvant clinical trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective survey of 459 patients from the SEARCH Database treated with RP between 1990 and 2002 was done. Multivariate analysis was used to compare the preoperative variables of patient age, race, PSA, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage and percent of prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer for the ability to predict time to PSA recurrence following RP. Significant independent predictors were combined to create a novel risk grouping model.
RESULTS: On multivariate analysis biopsy Gleason score (p < 0.001), percent of biopsy tissue with cancer (p < 0.001) and serum PSA (p = 0.001) were the only significant independent predictors of PSA failure. Combining these 3 significant predictors of PSA failure using previously published cutoff points for each variable generated a 4 tier preoperative model for predicting biochemical failure following RP (HR 1.91 for each 1 risk category increase, CI 1.62 to 2.26, p < 0.001). The model further stratified patients who were already stratified into low, intermediate and high risk groups based on a previously described model using PSA, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage. A simplified table was developed to predict the risk of biochemical recurrence within 2 years following surgery, as stratified by percent of tissue with cancer, PSA and biopsy Gleason score.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of serum PSA, biopsy Gleason score and percent of prostate biopsy tissue with cancer define a new preoperative model for predicting PSA failure following RP. This model further stratified patients who were already stratified based on PSA, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage, and it can be used preoperatively to identify patients at high risk who would be candidates for neoadjuvant clinical trials. Using this model an easy to use table was developed to predict preoperatively the 2-year risk of PSA recurrence following RP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126788     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000124463.13319.0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  The 'CaP Calculator': an online decision support tool for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Katz; Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony V D'Amico; Michael W Kattan; Martin G Sanda; Paul L Nguyen; Matthew R Smith; Peter R Carroll; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Maisa M Q Quintal; Luciana R Meirelles; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Ubirajara Ferreira; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Prostate cancer at the peripheral end of prostate biopsy specimen predicts increased risk of positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Sophina Trubel; Paul Schramek; Florian Wimpissinger; Hans Feichtinger; Christopher Springer; Clemens Wehrberger; Katja Fischereder; Karl Pummer; Thomas Martini; Roman Mayr; Armin Pycha; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The impact of core biopsy fragmentation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; José Alberto Salvo Reinato; Daniel Carlos Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Ramzi Rajab; Gabrielle Fisher; Michael W Kattan; Christopher S Foster; Tim Oliver; Henrik Møller; Victor Reuter; Peter Scardino; Jack Cuzick; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Case Study of Noni Extract in Men with Very Low-Risk or Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirasawa; Ian Pagano; Jeffrey Huang; Yuka Sasaki; Kaoru Murakami; Charles J Rosser; Hideki Furuya
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2021-10

7.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pathological Upgrade From Combined Transperineal Systematic and MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy to Final Pathology: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Junlong Zhuang; Yansheng Kan; Yuwen Wang; Alessandro Marquis; Xuefeng Qiu; Marco Oderda; Haifeng Huang; Marco Gatti; Fan Zhang; Paolo Gontero; Linfeng Xu; Giorgio Calleris; Yao Fu; Bing Zhang; Giancarlo Marra; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Radical prostatectomy specimens - a voice against focal therapy.

Authors:  Przemysław Adamczyk; Jakub Tworkiewicz; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-08-18

Review 9.  Prognostic histopathological and molecular markers on prostate cancer needle-biopsies: a review.

Authors:  A Marije Hoogland; Charlotte F Kweldam; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.