Literature DB >> 15126798

Predictors of metastatic disease in men with biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.

Onisuru T Okotie1, William J Aronson, Jeff A Wieder, Yen Liao, Fred Dorey, Jean B DeKERNION, Stephen J Freedland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined clinical and pathological predictors of positive bone scans and computerized tomography (CT) in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated with RP at West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center was performed to identify men with biochemical recurrence. All postoperative bone scans and pelvic CT following recurrence and prior to the initiation of hormone ablation therapy were reviewed. Preoperative clinical variables, pathological findings, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at postoperative imaging and postoperative PSA doubling time were compared between patients with positive and negative imaging study results.
RESULTS: A total of 128 patients with biochemical recurrence after RP who had postoperative pelvic CT or bone scans available were identified. A total of 97 bone scans were obtained, of which 11 (11%) were positive, and 71 CT scans were obtained, of which 5 (7%) were positive. Men with PSA doubling time less than 6 months were at increased risk of a positive bone scan (26% vs 3%) or positive CT (24% vs 0%) relative to men with longer PSA doubling time. In men with PSA doubling time less than 6 months the risk of a positive study highly depended on PSA at the time of imaging. In men with PSA less than 10 ng/ml the incidence of a positive study was 0% for pelvic CT and 11% for bone scan. In men with PSA greater than 10 ng/ml the risk of a positive study was 57% for pelvic CT and 46% for bone scan. In men with PSA doubling time greater than 6 months no clear relationship to PSA was seen, although the number of patients with a positive study was extremely low (positive bone scans 3% and positive CT 0%). However, none of the 6 imaging studies performed in men with PSA doubling times greater than 6 months and a markedly elevated PSA of 20 to 90 ng/ml was positive.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of detecting metastatic disease by bone scan or pelvic CT in men with biochemical recurrence following RP with PSA doubling time greater than 6 months is low despite marked PSA increases up to 90 ng/ml. In men with PSA doubling time less than 6 months the risk of detecting metastatic disease markedly increases when PSA is greater than 10 ng/ml. These results have important implications for the timing of imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence following RP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126798     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000127734.01845.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  37 in total

1.  Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Cristiana Ragano Caracciolo; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano; Antonio Orlacchio; Roberta Danieli; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Long-term overall survival and metastasis-free survival for men with prostate-specific antigen-recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: analysis of the Center for Prostate Disease Research National Database.

Authors:  Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Yongmei Chen; Sally I Elsamanoudi; Stephen A Brassell; Mario V Da Rocha; Mario A Eisenberger; David G McLeod
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  PET/CT imaging of recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Scher; M Seitz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  [(11)C]choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ludwig Rinnab; Joerg Simon; Richard E Hautmann; M V Cronauer; Kathrin Hohl; Andreas K Buck; Sven N Reske; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The value of multimodality imaging in the investigation of a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the Irish hospital setting.

Authors:  L C McLoughlin; S Inder; D Moran; C O'Rourke; R P Manecksha; T H Lynch
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 7.  Unmet needs in the prediction and detection of metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor; Mario Eisenberger; Michael W Kattan; Bertrand Tombal; Frederic Lecouvet
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-06

Review 8.  Management Options for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Farhad Fakhrejahani; Ravi A Madan; William L Dahut
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

9.  [(11)C]choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Elisa Coradeschi; Vincenzo Scattoni; Valentino Bettinardi; Cesare Cozzarini; Massimo Freschi; Ferruccio Fazio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Potential surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer survival: analysis of a phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael E Ray; Kyounghwa Bae; Maha H A Hussain; Gerald E Hanks; William U Shipley; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.