Literature DB >> 16172837

Validation of the Maltese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

E Felice1, J Saliba, V Grech, J Cox.   

Abstract

This paper reports the validation of the Maltese translated Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against Diagnostic Criteria for Research (DCR-10) diagnosis for severe, moderate and mild depression during pregnancy (antenatally) and at 8 weeks postnatally. A random sample of 239 pregnant women were interviewed at booking and at 8 weeks postnatally using a detailed sociodemographic history, the Revised Version of the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) and Maltese translation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The Maltese translated EPDS had good face validity and had satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for identifying depression both antenatally and postnatally. Cut-off scores of 13/14 antenatally and 11/12 postnatally are recommended when using the Maltese EPDS. Controversial issues surrounds the use of the EPDS in clinical practice. However, introducing the EPDS in pregnancy will help to identify women who are at high risk of depression so as to treat appropriately and early in the antenatal period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172837     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-005-0099-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  24 in total

1.  Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies using psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS.

Authors:  Rachel Mann; Catherine E Hewitt; Simon M Gilbody
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 2.  The role of body image in prenatal and postpartum depression: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Marushka L Silveira; Karen A Ertel; Nancy Dole; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Generating an efficient version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an urban obstetrical population.

Authors:  Jackie K Gollan; Stephen R Wisniewski; James F Luther; Heather F Eng; John Louis Dills; Dorothy Sit; Jody D Ciolino; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Comparative performance of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening antepartum depression.

Authors:  Qiuyue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Marta Rondon; Sixto E Sánchez; Pedro J García; Elena Sánchez; Yasmin V Barrios; Gregory E Simon; David C Henderson; Swee May Cripe; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period: impact of trimester and parity.

Authors:  Shuang Ji; Qi Long; D Jeffrey Newport; Hyeji Na; Bettina Knight; Elizabeth B Zach; Natalie J Morris; Michael Kutner; Zachary N Stowe
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Identification of postpartum depression.

Authors:  Dorothy K Y Sit; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values.

Authors:  Qi Long; Xiaoxi Zhang; Brent A Johnson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Prevalence of Depression during Pregnancy in Spanish Women: Trajectory and Risk Factors in Each Trimester.

Authors:  M Carmen Míguez; M Belén Vázquez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The simplified Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for antenatal depression: is it a valid measure for pre-screening?

Authors:  Sea Kyung Choi; Jung Jin Kim; Yong Gyu Park; Hyun Sun Ko; In Yang Park; Jong Chul Shin
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  The utility of screening for perinatal depression in the second trimester among Chinese: a three-wave prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ying Lau; Daniel Fu Keung Wong; Kin Sin Chan
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.