Literature DB >> 26379316

Sensitivity to imputation models and assumptions in receiver operating characteristic analysis with incomplete data.

Jale Karakaya1, Erdem Karabulut1, Recai M Yucel2.   

Abstract

Modern statistical methods using incomplete data have been increasingly applied in a wide variety of substantive problems. Similarly, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, a method used in evaluating diagnostic tests or biomarkers in medical research, has also been increasingly popular problem in both its development and application. While missing-data methods have been applied in ROC analysis, the impact of model mis-specification and/or assumptions (e.g. missing at random) underlying the missing data has not been thoroughly studied. In this work, we study the performance of multiple imputation (MI) inference in ROC analysis. Particularly, we investigate parametric and non-parametric techniques for MI inference under common missingness mechanisms. Depending on the coherency of the imputation model with the underlying data generation mechanism, our results show that MI generally leads to well-calibrated inferences under ignorable missingness mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ROC; diagnostic test; missing data; multiple imputation; sensitivity

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379316      PMCID: PMC4568435          DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2014.983111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul        ISSN: 0094-9655            Impact factor:   1.424


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.

Authors:  L M Collins; J L Schafer; C M Kam
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

Authors:  Joseph L Schafer; John W Graham
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-06

3.  Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias.

Authors:  Ofer Harel; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.

Authors:  J A H de Groot; K J M Janssen; A H Zwinderman; K G M Moons; J B Reitsma
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  R Gray; C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Nonparametric multiple imputation for receiver operating characteristics analysis when some biomarker values are missing at random.

Authors:  Qi Long; Xiaoxi Zhang; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values.

Authors:  Qi Long; Xiaoxi Zhang; Brent A Johnson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Can early change in eating disorder psychopathology predict outcome in guided self-help for binge eating?

Authors:  Paul E Jenkins; Lydia Smith; Ceridwen Morgan
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.