Literature DB >> 20822930

External validation of the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) score in a single-surgeon radical prostatectomy series.

Stacy Loeb1, Gustavo F Carvalhal, Donghui Kan, Angel Desai, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer clinical staging has significant limitations in the ability to accurately risk-stratify patients for prompt treatment or expectant management. The University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (UCSF CAPRA) was recently described as a straightforward staging system that uses clinical variables to generate a score ranging from 0 to 10. Our objective was to perform an external validation of the CAPRA score as a predictor of 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in a single-surgeon radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the performance characteristics of the preoperative CAPRA score (0-10) to predict biochemical progression-free survival (PFS) in 990 men who underwent RRP by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2009.
RESULTS: CAPRA scores were significantly associated with the risk of early biochemical progression in our series. For example, 5-year PFS was markedly different for scores at the extremes of 0 to 1 vs. ≥7 (95% vs. 40%, respectively). The concordance index was 0.764 for the prediction of biochemical progression using CAPRA scores in this cohort, which compares favorably with the concordance index of 0.66 in the original CaPSURE dataset.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results validate the UCSF-CAPRA score as a significant predictor of 5-year PFS in a single surgeon series. The CAPRA score is a simple preoperative tool that can be readily applied in clinical practice to help risk-stratify prostate cancer patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822930      PMCID: PMC3137684          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  20 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Hans Garmo; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Bo Johan Norlén; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium.

Authors:  A W Partin; L A Mangold; D M Lamm; P C Walsh; J I Epstein; J D Pearson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  Shilajit D Kundu; Kimberly A Roehl; Scott E Eggener; Jo Ann V Antenor; Misop Han; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; Judith Fine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Mark S Litwin; David M Latini; Janeen Du Chane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A W Partin; J Yoo; H B Carter; J D Pearson; D W Chan; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Joseph A Mitchell; Matthew R Cooperberg; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; Christopher J Kane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  8 in total

1.  Age at diagnosis on prostate cancer survival undergoing androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment in daily practice: results from Japanese observational cohort.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Haruhito Azuma; Shiro Hinotsu; Taiji Tsukamoto; Mototsugu Oya; Osamu Ogawa; Tadaichi Kitamura; Suzuki Kazuhiro; Seiji Naito; Mikio Namiki; Kazuo Nishimura; Yoshihiko Hirao; Michiyuki Usami; Masaru Murai; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Prevalence of the HOXB13 G84E prostate cancer risk allele in men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; William B Isaacs; Kimberly A Zuhlke; Cecilia Yee; Patrick C Walsh; Sarah D Isaacs; Anna M Johnson; Charles E Ewing; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Wasim H Chowdhury; James E Montie; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Predictive value of the cancer of the prostate risk assessment score for recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy in Korea: a single-surgeon series.

Authors:  Won Ik Seo; Pil Moon Kang; Jae Il Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-05-12

4.  Diabetes and beta-adrenergic blockage are risk factors for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Malte Krönig; Christian Haverkamp; Antonia Schulte; Laura Heinicke; Kathrin Schaal; Vanessa Drendel; Martin Werner; Ulrich Wetterauer; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Cordula Annette Jilg
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Meta-analysis of predictive models to assess the clinical validity and utility for patient-centered medical decision making: application to the CAncer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA).

Authors:  Marine Lorent; Haïfa Maalmi; Philippe Tessier; Stéphane Supiot; Etienne Dantan; Yohann Foucher
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Very-high-risk localized prostate cancer: definition and outcomes.

Authors:  D Sundi; V M Wang; P M Pierorazio; M Han; T J Bivalacqua; M W Ball; E S Antonarakis; A W Partin; E M Schaeffer; A E Ross
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) Preoperative Score Versus Postoperative Score (CAPRA-S): ability to predict cancer progression and decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Won Ik Seo; Pil Moon Kang; Dong Il Kang; Jang Ho Yoon; Wansuk Kim; Jae Il Chung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  The Within-Group Discrimination Ability of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score for Men with Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Hae Do Jung; Joo Yong Lee; Jong Kyou Kwon; Seong Uk Jeh; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Ham; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.