Literature DB >> 24676427

Age at diagnosis on prostate cancer survival undergoing androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment in daily practice: results from Japanese observational cohort.

Teruo Inamoto1, Haruhito Azuma, Shiro Hinotsu, Taiji Tsukamoto, Mototsugu Oya, Osamu Ogawa, Tadaichi Kitamura, Suzuki Kazuhiro, Seiji Naito, Mikio Namiki, Kazuo Nishimura, Yoshihiko Hirao, Michiyuki Usami, Masaru Murai, Hideyuki Akaza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) had been used extensively in Japan than in the USA and European countries regardless of the disease risk or patient's age. To illustrate the consequence of PADT from daily clinical practice, we evaluated the relationship among age, disease risk, and survival of patients with prostate cancer treated by PADT in largest Asian cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 19,246 men subjected to PADT enrolled in the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer were enrolled for the present analysis. Patients were divided into four groups based on age at diagnosis: age <66, 66-70, 71-75, and >75. Risk was stratified according to the Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (J-CAPRA). Multivariate competing risks regression analysis was performed for OS and PFS.
RESULTS: There was downward stage migration over age. Among men aged >75 years, 34.1 % had nodal or distant metastatic disease. In contrast, 56.0 % of patients aged <66 years presented with advanced disease. The modality of hormonal therapy varied with age across risk groups; the younger age group showed a higher proportion of maximal androgen blockade, while the proportion of monotherapy use was higher in older men. The likelihood of low-risk disease by J-CAPRA classification increased significantly with increasing age (p < 0.0001 by Pearson's chi-square test). The same as OS, the PFS rate increased with age until after the age of 75. Men aged 71-75 had better survival rates even after adjustments for treatment modality alone, or for treatment modality plus disease risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Age cohorts do affect orientation toward favorable disease course after PADT with men aged 71-75 being benefiting more from PADT than other age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24676427     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1638-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  21 in total

Review 1.  The case for androgen deprivation as primary therapy for early stage disease: results from J-CaP and CaPSURE.

Authors:  Hideyuki Akaza; Shiro Hinotsu; Michiyuki Usami; Osamu Ogawa; Susumu Kagawa; Tadaichi Kitamura; Taiji Tsukamoto; Seiji Naito; Yoshihiko Hirao; Masaru Murai; Hidetoshi Yamanaka; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Differences in prognostic factors and survival among white and Asian men with prostate cancer, California, 1995-2004.

Authors:  Anthony S Robbins; Theresa M Koppie; Scarlett L Gomez; Arti Parikh-Patel; Paul K Mills
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Fifth Joint Meeting of J-CaP and CaPSURE: advancing the global understanding of prostate cancer and its management.

Authors:  Hideyuki Akaza; Peter Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Shiro Hinotsu
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Prostate-specific antigen nadir and cancer-specific mortality following hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen failure.

Authors:  Alexandra J Stewart; Howard I Scher; Ming-Hui Chen; David G McLeod; Peter R Carroll; Judd W Moul; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Risk assessment among prostate cancer patients receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Shiro Hinotsu; Mikio Namiki; Kazuto Ito; Jeanette Broering; Peter R Carroll; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  External validation of the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) score in a single-surgeon radical prostatectomy series.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Gustavo F Carvalhal; Donghui Kan; Angel Desai; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Current status of endocrine therapy for prostate cancer in Japan analysis of primary androgen deprivation therapy on the basis of data collected by J-CaP.

Authors:  Shiro Hinotsu; Hideyuki Akaza; Michiyuki Usami; Osamu Ogawa; Susumu Kagawa; Tadaichi Kitamura; Taiji Tsukamoto; Seiji Naito; Mikio Namiki; Yoshihiko Hirao; Masaru Murai; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy use and the risk of death in men with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy who have no or at least a single risk factor for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Akash Nanda; Ming-Hui Chen; Brian J Moran; Michelle H Braccioforte; Daniel Dosoretz; Sharon Salenius; Michael Katin; Rudi Ross; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram.

Authors:  Lee Richstone; Fernando J Bianco; Hiral H Shah; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.