Literature DB >> 19509351

Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Jeanette M Broering, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many tools for the assessment of prostate cancer risk have been published, most are designed to predict only biochemical recurrence, usually after a single specified treatment. We assessed the accuracy of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, which was validated previously to predict pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy, to predict metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality.
METHODS: We studied 10 627 men with clinically localized prostate cancer in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor registry, who underwent primary radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy (external beam or interstitial), androgen deprivation monotherapy, or watchful waiting/active surveillance, and had at least 6 months of follow-up after treatment. CAPRA scores were calculated at diagnosis from the prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, percentage of biopsy cores that were positive for cancer, clinical tumor stage, and age at diagnosis. Survival was studied with Kaplan-Meier analyses. Associations between increasing CAPRA scores and bone metastasis, cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality were examined by use of proportional hazards regression, with adjustment for primary treatment; for all-cause mortality, the analysis also included adjustment for age and comorbidity. Accuracy of the CAPRA score was assessed with the concordance (c)-index.
RESULTS: Among the 10 627 patients, 311 (2.9%) men developed bone metastases, 251 (2.4%) died of prostate cancer, and 1582 (14.9%) died of other causes. Each single-point increase in the CAPRA score was associated with increased bone metastases (hazard ratio [HR] for bone metastases = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39 to 1.56), cancer-specific mortality (HR for prostate cancer death = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.48), and all-cause mortality (HR for death = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.16). The CAPRA score was accurate for predicting metastases (c-index = 0.78), cancer-specific mortality (c-index = 0.80), and all-cause mortality (c-index = 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who were managed with one of five primary modalities, the CAPRA score predicted clinical prostate cancer endpoints with good accuracy. These results support the value of the CAPRA score as a risk assessment and stratification tool for both research studies and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19509351      PMCID: PMC2697208          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  28 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Cancer incidence after localized therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kihyuck Moon; George J Stukenborg; Jessica Keim; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Zohar A Dotan; Paul A Fearn; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Inventory of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vitaly Margulis; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Cancer statistics, 2008.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Taylor Murray; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Angel M Serio; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer and the risk of cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Henry K Tsai; Anthony V D'Amico; Natalia Sadetsky; Ming-Hui Chen; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Matthew R Cooperberg; June M Chan; Benjamin J Davies; Peter C Albertsen; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher A Warlick; Lars Holmberg; Donald E Bailey; Meredith E Wallace; Philip W Kantoff; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.

Authors:  Matthias May; Nina Knoll; Michael Siegsmund; Dirk Fahlenkamp; Horst Vogler; Bernd Hoschke; Oliver Gralla
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Roderick MacDonald; Indulis Rutks; Tatyana A Shamliyan; Brent C Taylor; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  117 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities for cost reduction of medical care: part 3.

Authors:  Monte Malach; William J Baumol
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-08

2.  Prostate cancer managed with active surveillance: role of anatomic MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Vincent Fradet; John Kurhanewicz; Janet E Cowan; Alexander Karl; Fergus V Coakley; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Multidisciplinary intervention of early, lethal metastatic prostate cancer: Report from the 2015 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Joshua M Lang; Robert B Den; Isla P Garraway; Tamara L Lotan; Ashley E Ross; Tanya Stoyanova; Steve Y Cho; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Genetic variants in the TEP1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk and recurrence.

Authors:  C Gu; Q Li; Y Zhu; Y Qu; G Zhang; M Wang; Y Yang; J Wang; L Jin; Q Wei; D Ye
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Updated trends in imaging use in men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  S P Porten; A Smith; A Y Odisho; M S Litwin; C S Saigal; P R Carroll; M R Cooperberg
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 8.  Omega-3 fatty acids, genetic variants in COX-2 and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Vincent Fradet; John S Witte
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2009-09-23

9.  Inherited genetic variant predisposes to aggressive but not indolent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Siqun Lilly Zheng; Sarah D Isaacs; Kathleen E Wiley; Fredrik Wiklund; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; Ge Li; Lina D Purcell; Seong-Tae Kim; Fang-Chi Hsu; Pär Stattin; Jonas Hugosson; Jan Adolfsson; Patrick C Walsh; Jeffrey M Trent; David Duggan; John Carpten; Henrik Grönberg; William B Isaacs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The impact of a family history of prostate cancer on the prognosis and features of the disease in Korea: results from a cross-sectional longitudinal pilot study.

Authors:  Kwang Suk Lee; Kyo Chul Koo; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.