L Lombard1, P W Crous, B D Wingfield, M J Wingfield. 1. Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Tree Protection Co-operative Programme, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Abstract
Calonectria pauciramosa is a pathogen of numerous plant hosts worldwide. Recent studies have indicated that it included cryptic species, some of which are identified in this study. Isolates from various geographical origins were collected and compared based on morphology, DNA sequence data of the beta-tubulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor-1alpha regions and mating compatibility. Comparisons of the DNA sequence data and mating compatibility revealed three new species. These included Ca. colombiana sp. nov. from Colombia, Ca. polizzii sp. nov. from Italy and Ca. zuluensis sp. nov. from South Africa, all of which had distinguishing morphological features. Based on DNA sequence data, Ca. brasiliensis is also elevated to species level.
Calonectria pauciramosa is a pathogen of numerous plant hosts worldwide. Recent studies have indicated that it included cryptic species, some of which are identified in this study. Isolates from various geographical origins were collected and compared based on morphology, DNA sequence data of the beta-tubulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor-1alpha regions and mating compatibility. Comparisons of the DNA sequence data and mating compatibility revealed three new species. These included Ca. colombiana sp. nov. from Colombia, Ca. polizzii sp. nov. from Italy and Ca. zuluensis sp. nov. from South Africa, all of which had distinguishing morphological features. Based on DNA sequence data, Ca. brasiliensis is also elevated to species level.
Entities:
Keywords:
Calonectria; plant pathogens; sexual compatibility; systematics
Several past studies have focused on the taxonomy of Calonectria
spp. with small, 1-septate macroconidia and ellipsoidal to obpyriform vesicles
(Crous ,
Overmeyer , Schoch et al.
1999,
2000). These
Calonectria spp. were initially regarded as either Ca.
morganii (= Cylindrocladium scoparium) or Ca. scoparia
(= Cy. candelabrum) based on their morphological similarities.
However, the anamorph state of Ca. morganii was circumscribed as
having ellipsoidal to pyriform vesicles and Ca. scoparia having
ellipsoidal to obpyriform vesicles by Crous et al.
(1993). Later studies,
incorporating DNA sequence data, have shown that Ca. morganii is
restricted to the Northern Hemisphere and Brazil
(Crous ,
Overmeyer , Schoch ). In contrast, Ca. scoparia is found worldwide and
forms part of a species complex consisting of four mating groups, each
representing a different Calonectria species that includes Ca.
pauciramosa (anamorph: Cy. pauciramosum), Ca. scoparia, Ca.
mexicana (anamorph: Cy. mexicanum) and Ca. insularis
(anamorph: Cy. insulare) (Schoch
).Calonectria pauciramosa has been reported worldwide on numerous
plant hosts (Schoch , Koike et al. 1999, Koike & Crous 2001,
Polizzi & Crous 1999,
Polizzi 2000,
Polizzi & Catara 2001,
Polizzi & Vitale 2001,
Crous 2002, Polizzi et
al. 2006,
2007,
2009,
Vitale ),
where it causes diseases such as cutting rot, damping-off, root rot and leaf
blight. In South Africa and Australia, Ca. pauciramosa is regarded as
the dominant pathogen in commercial forest nurseries
(Crous 2002) and it is also
found on various horticultural crops in commercial nurseries in Italy and the
U.S.A. (Schoch , Crous 2002,
Polizzi et al. 2006,
2007,
2009,
Vitale ).Schoch et al.
(2001) considered female
fertility in populations of Ca. pauciramosa from various geographical
regions to determine the ratio of mating types present, and based on these
data suggested that Ca. pauciramosa was endemic to South America
given that the ratio of both mating types approached 1:1. Furthermore, the
study also indicated that Ca. pauciramosa isolates from California
were represented by only one mating type, supporting the view that this
represented an introduced pathogen. Isolates from Italy showed higher ratios
of hermaphrodites and some variation was observed in the β-tubulin
sequences. In contrast, South African isolates had close to a 1:1 mating type
ratio and showed variation in β-tubulin sequence data (Schoch et
al. 1999,
2001), indicating that this
was either a native pathogen or that there had been multiple introductions
into the country.Initial investigations using DNA sequence comparisons and mating studies on
Ca. pauciramosa isolates from South Africa and Colombia showed some
variation amongst isolates. These findings and those of Schoch et al.
(2001) suggested that Ca.
pauciramosa might accommodate a number of cryptic species. The aim of
this study was to consider the phylogenetic relationships, morphological
characters and mating compatibility of available isolates of Ca.
pauciramosa and to determine whether this species represented an
assemblage of cryptic taxa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolates
Isolates of Ca. pauciramosa were obtained from culture collections
(Table 1) or were isolated from
infected plant material and soil samples following the methods of Crous
(2002). For each isolate,
single conidial cultures were prepared on 2 % (w/v) malt extract agar (MEA,
Biolab, Midrand, South Africa). Representative strains are maintained in the
culture collection (CMW) of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology
Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa and the
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Table 1.
Isolates of Calonectria pauciramosa and other Calonectria
species studied.
GenBank accession no.
Species
Isolate
Mating type
β-tubulin
Histone H3
Translation elongation factor-1α
Host
Country
Collector
Ca. brasiliensis
CBS
230.51T (= IMI 299576)
GQ267241
GQ267259
GQ267328
Eucalyptus sp.
Brazil
T.R. Ciferri
CBS 114257
GQ267242
GQ267260
GQ267329
Leaf litter
Brazil
A.C. Alfenas
CBS 116078 (= UFO
202)
GQ421772
GQ421780
GQ421788
E. citriodora
Brazil
A.O. Carvalo
CMW 31505 (= CPC 2581)
GQ421775
GQ421783
GQ421791
Prunus sp.
South Africa
C. Linde
CMW 31507 (= CPC 602)
GQ421773
GQ421781
GQ421789
Eucalyptus sp.
Brazil
P.W. Crous
CMW 31508 (= CPC 1943)
GQ421774
GQ421782
GQ421790
Leaf litter
Brazil
A.C. Alfenas
Ca. colombiana sp. nov.
CBS 111136
Homothallic
FJ972424
FJ972443
FJ972493
Soil
Colombia
M.J. Wingfield
CBS
115127T
Homothallic
FJ972423
FJ972442
FJ972492
Soil
Colombia
M.J. Wingfield
CBS 115638
Homothallic
FJ972422
FJ972441
FJ972491
Soil
Colombia
M.J. Wingfield
CBS 115694
Homothallic
FJ972425
FJ972444
FJ972494
Soil
Colombia
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 9058
Homothallic
FJ972420
FJ972439
FJ972489
Soil
Colombia
M.J. Wingfield
Ca. colombiensis
CBS 112221
AY725620
AY725663
AY725712
Soil
Colombia
M.J. Wingfield
Ca. insularis
CBS 114558
AF210861
FJ918526
FJ918556
Soil
Madagascar
P.W. Crous
CBS 114559
AF210862
FJ918525
FJ918555
Soil
Madagascar
C.L. Schoch
Ca. mexicana
CBS
110918T
AF210863
FJ972460
FJ972526
Soil
Mexico
M.J. Wingfield
Ca. morganii
CBS 110666
FJ918509
FJ918527
FJ918557
Ilex vomitoria
U.S.A.
N.E. El-Gholl
CBS 119669
DQ521599
DQ521601
GQ421796
Pistacia lentiscus
Italy
G. Polizzi
CBS 119670
DQ521600
DQ521602
GQ421797
Pistacia lentiscus
Italy
G. Polizzi
CMW 31506 (= CPC1722 = P94-4359)
AF210875
GQ421787
GQ421795
Dodenaea vicosa
U.S.A.
N.E. El-Gholl
Ca. pauciramosa
CMW 1786
Unknown
FJ972378
FJ972445
FJ972495
Eucalyptus smithii
South Africa
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 2151
Mat1-2
FJ972400
FJ972468
FJ972517
E. nitens
South Africa
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 5683T
Mat1-2
FJ918514
FJ918531
FJ918565
E. grandis
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CMW 7592
Mat1-1
FJ972380
FJ972447
FJ972497
E. grandis
Uruguay
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 7597
Mat1-1
FJ972406
FJ972474
FJ972523
E. grandis
Uruguay
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 7600
Mat1-1
FJ972405
FJ972473
FJ972522
E. grandis
Uruguay
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 7826
Mat1-2
FJ972392
FJ972459
FJ972509
Soil
Australia
P.W. Crous
CMW 7827
Mat1-2
FJ972385
FJ972452
FJ972502
Soil
Australia
P.W. Crous
CMW 7828
Mat1-2
FJ972391
FJ972458
FJ972508
Soil
Australia
P.W. Crous
CMW 7849
Mat1-2
FJ972383
FJ972450
FJ972500
Erica sp.
U.S.A.
S.T. Koike
CMW 7851
Mat1-2
FJ972382
FJ972449
FJ972499
Mytrus communis
U.S.A.
S.T. Koike
CMW 7852
Mat1-2
FJ972381
FJ972448
FJ972498
M. communis
U.S.A.
S.T. Koike
CMW 8061
Mat1-2
FJ972386
FJ972453
FJ972503
Soil
Australia
P.W. Crous
CMW 9151
Mat1-2
FJ972384
FJ972451
FJ972501
Acacia mearnsii
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 9172
Mat1-2
FJ972379
FJ972446
FJ972496
A. mearnsii
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 10148
Mat1-2
FJ972387
FJ972454
FJ972504
Erica sp.
U.S.A.
S.T. Koike
CBS 102296
Mat1-2
FJ972404
FJ972472
FJ972521
Vriessea sp.
New Zealand
H.M. Dance
CBS 110945
Mat1-1
FJ972389
FJ972456
FJ972506
Podocarpus sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CBS 111873
Mat1-1
FJ972399
FJ972467
FJ972516
Prunus sp.
South Africa
C. Linde
CBS 114861
Mat1-1
FJ972403
FJ972471
FJ972520
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CBS 115670
Mat1-1
FJ972393
FJ972461
FJ972510
Pinus sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CBS 115893
Unknown
FJ972411
FJ972430
FJ972480
CMW 30819
Mat1-2
FJ972402
FJ972470
FJ972519
E. grandis
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CMW 30875
Mat1-1
FJ972390
FJ972457
FJ972507
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CMW 30823
Mat1-1
FJ918515
FJ918532
FJ918566
E. grandis
South Africa
P.W. Crous
CMW 30814
Unknown
FJ972408
FJ972427
FJ972477
Eucalyptus sp.
Kenya
J. Roux
CMW 30822
Unknown
FJ972409
FJ972428
FJ972478
Eucalyptus sp.
Kenya
J. Roux
CMW30873
Mat1-2
FJ972388
FJ972455
FJ972505
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 27203
Mat1-2
FJ972398
FJ972466
FJ972515
Eucalyptus sp.
China
S. Chen
CMW 27206
Mat1-2
FJ972396
FJ972464
FJ972513
Eucalyptus sp.
China
S. Chen
CMW 27283
Mat1-2
FJ972397
FJ972465
FJ972514
Eucalyptus sp.
China
S. Chen
CMW 30878
Mat1-1
FJ972401
FJ972469
FJ972518
Prunus sp.
South Africa
C. Linde
CMW 30818
Mat1-2
FJ972395
FJ972463
FJ972512
Limonium sp.
New Zealand
I. Brice
CMW 30817
Unknown
FJ972394
FJ972462
FJ972511
Rhododendron sp.
New Zealand
R.A.J. White
CMW 30879
Mat1-2
FJ972407
FJ972475
FJ972524
Azalea sp.
Germany
G. Hagedorn
CMW 30815
Unknown
FJ972410
FJ972429
FJ972479
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
Ca. polizzii sp. nov.
CBS
123402T
FJ972419
FJ972438
FJ972488
Arbutus unedo
Italy
G. Polizzi
CMW 7804
FJ972417
FJ972436
FJ972486
Callistemon citrinus
Italy
G. Polizzi
CMW 10151
FJ972418
FJ972437
FJ972487
A. unedo
Italy
G. Polizzi
Ca. scoparia
CMW 31000
FJ972426
FJ972476
FJ97252
Eucalyptus sp.
Brazil
A.C. Alfenas
CMW 31001
GQ421779
GQ267246
GQ267246
Eucalyptus sp.
Brazil
A.C. Alfenas
CBS 116076
GQ421776
GQ421784
GQ421792
Eucalyptus sp.
Brazil
P.W. Crous
CBS 116081
GQ421777
GQ421785
GQ421793
Soil
Brazil
M.J. Wingfield
CMW 7578
GQ421778
GQ421786
GQ421794
E. grandis
Argentina
L. Lombard
Ca. spathulata
CBS 112689
AF308463
FJ918524
FJ918554
E. viminalis
Brazil
N.E. El-Gholl
CBS555.92T
GQ267215
GQ267261
GQ267331
Araucaria angustifolia
Brazil
C. Hodges
Ca. zuluensis sp. nov.
CMW 9115
Homothallic
FJ972413
FJ972432
FJ972482
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 9188T
Homothallic
FJ972414
FJ972433
FJ972483
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 9208
Homothallic
FJ972412
FJ972431
FJ972481
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 9215
Homothallic
FJ972416
FJ972435
FJ972485
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
L. Lombard
CMW 9896
Homothallic
FJ972415
FJ972434
FJ972484
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
L. Lombard
Cy chinense
CBS 112744
AY725618
AY725660
AY725709
Soil
China
M.J. Wingfield
Cy. hawksworthii
CBS
111870T
AF333407
DQ190649
FJ918558
Nelumbo nucifera
Mauritius
A. Peerally
Cy. leucothoës
CBS
109166T
FJ918508
FJ918523
FJ918553
Leucothoë axillaris
U.S.A.
N.E. El-Gholl
CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CMW:
culture collection of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute
(FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; TEx-type
cultures.
Isolates of Calonectria pauciramosa and other Calonectria
species studied.CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CMW:
culture collection of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute
(FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; TEx-type
cultures.
Sexual compatibility
A total of 57 single conidial Ca. pauciramosa-like isolates
(Table 1), originating from
various geographic regions and hosts were crossed in all possible
combinations. Mating-tester strains CMW 30823 (= STE-U 416) and CMW 5683 (=
STE-U 971) for Ca. pauciramosa defined by Schoch et al.
(2001) were also crossed with
these isolates. Matings were done as described in Schoch et al.
(1999) on carnation leaf agar
(CLA; Fisher , Crous ) and on minimal salt agar (MSA; Guerber & Correll 2001,
Halleen )
with sterile toothpicks placed on the surface of the agar. Control tests,
where isolates were crossed with themselves, were undertaken to determine
whether strains had a heterothallic or homothallic mating system. The plates
were stacked in plastic containers and incubated at 22 °C for 6 wk.
Matings were regarded as successful when isolate combinations produced
perithecia extruding viable ascospores.
DNA sequence comparisons
Calonectria pauciramosa-like isolates were grown on MEA for 7 d.
Mycelium was then scraped from the surface of the cultures, freeze-dried, and
ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen, using a mortar and pestle. DNA was
extracted from the powdered mycelium as described by Lombard et al.
(2008). Three loci including
fragments of the β-tubulin (BT), histone H3 (HIS3) and translation
elongation factor-1 alpha (TEF-1α) gene regions were sequenced. Primers
used to sequence these regions were T1
(O'Donnell & Cigelnik
1997) and CYLTUB1R (Crous
) for the BT region, CYLH3F and CYLH3R
(Crous )
for the HIS3 region and EF1-728F (Carbone
& Kohn 1999) and EF2
(O'Donnell ) for the TEF-1α region. The PCR reaction mixture used
to amplify the different loci consisted of 2.5 units FastStart Taq
polymerase (Roche Applied Science, U.S.A.), 1× PCR buffer, 1–1.5
mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 μm of each primer and
approximately 30 ng of fungal genomic DNA, made up to a total reaction volume
of 25 μL with sterile distilled water.Amplified fragments were purified using High Pure PCR Product Purification
Kit (Roche, U.S.A.) and sequenced in both directions. For this purpose, the
BigDye terminator sequencing kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, U.S.A.) and an
ABI PRISM™ 3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) were used. All PCRs
and sequencing reactions were performed on an Eppendorf Mastercycler Personal
PCR (Eppendorf AG, Germany) with cycling conditions as described in Crous
et al. (2006) for BT
and HIS3. The same cycling conditions for HIS3 were used for TEF-1α
amplifications.The generated sequences were added to other sequences of closely related
Calonectria spp. obtained from GenBank
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
and these were assembled and aligned using Sequence Navigator v. 1.0.1
(Applied Biosystems) and MAFFT v. 5.11
(Katoh ),
respectively. The aligned sequences were then manually corrected where needed.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP'S) were determined for each gene region
analysed using DnaSP v. 5.00.07 (Librado
& Rozas 2009).To determine whether the DNA sequence datasets for the three gene regions
were congruent, a 70 % reciprocal bootstrap method using Neighbour-Joining
with Maximum Likelihood distance was employed
(Mason-Gamer & Kellogg
1996, Gueidan ). Models of evolution were estimated in Modeltest v. 3.7
(Posada & Crandall 1998)
using the Akaike Information Criterion for each separate gene region. The
bootstrap analyses were run in PAUP (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony v.
4.0b10, Swofford 2002) for 10
000 replicates. Resulting tree topologies were compared visually for conflicts
between the separate gene regions. Phylogenetic relationships were estimated
in PAUP, by heuristic searches based on 1 000 random addition sequences and
tree bisection-reconnection was used, with the branch swapping option set on
“best trees” only.All characters were weighted equally and alignment gaps were treated as
missing data. Measures calculated for parsimony included tree length (TL),
consistency index (CI), retention index (RI) and rescaled consistence index
(RC). Bootstrap analysis (Hillis &
Bull 1993) was based on 1 000 replications. All sequences for the
isolates studied were analysed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for
Nucleotide sequences (BLASTN, Altschul
). The phylogenetic analysis included 73
partial gene sequences per gene, representing 11 Calonectria and Cylindrocladium species (Table
1). Calonectria colombiensis
(CBS 112221) and
Cy. chinense (CBS
112744) were used as outgroup taxa
(Lombard ). Novel sequences were deposited in GenBank and all
alignments in TreeBASE
(http://www.treebase.org).A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was used to generate
phylogenetic trees with Bayesian probabilities using MrBayes v. 3.1.1
(Ronquist & Huelsenbeck
2003). Models of nucleotide substitution for each gene were
determined using Mrmodeltest (Nylander
2004) and included for each gene partition. Two analyses of four
MCMC chains were run from random trees for 1 000 000 generations and sampled
every 100 generations. Both runs converged on the same likelihood score and
tree topology. Therefore, the first 1 000 trees were discarded as the burn-in
phase of each analysis and posterior probabilities were determined from the
remaining trees.
Taxonomy
For morphological identification of the anamorphs, single conidial cultures
were prepared on synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA;
Nirenburg 1981, Lombard et
al. 2009,
2010). Inoculated plates were
incubated at room temperature and examined after 7d. Gross morphological
characteristics were determined by mounting fungal structures in lactic acid
and 30 measurements at ×1 000 magnification were made for each isolate.
Teleomorph morphology was determined by mounting perithecia obtained from the
sexual compatibility tests in Leica mountant (Setpoint Premier, Johannesburg,
South Africa) and hand-sectioned with a Leica CM1100 cryostat (Setpoint
Technologies) at -20 °C. The 10 μm sections were mounted in lactophenol
or 3 % KOH. Gross morphological characteristics were observed as above. The 95
% confidence levels were calculated and extreme measurements of conidia are
given in parentheses. For other structures, only the extremes are indicated.
Optimal growth temperatures were determined for each isolate on MEA at
5–35 °C in 5 °C intervals in the dark. Colony colours were
determined after 7 d on MEA at 25 °C in the dark, using the colour charts
of Rayner (1970) for
comparison. Descriptions, nomenclature, and illustrations were deposited in
MycoBank (Crous ).
RESULTS
Protoperithecia formed within 3 wk and successful matings produced
perithecia with viable ascospores within 6 wk on both CLA and MSA. A total of
1 649 crosses were made using the 57 putative Ca. pauciramosa
isolates and mating tester strains for Ca. pauciramosa. This resulted
in 642 tests where perithecia produced viable ascospores. Self-self crosses
indicated that 11 of the 57 isolates were self-fertile (homothallic). These
included the Colombian isolates
CBS 111041,
CBS 111136,
CBS 115127,
CBS 115638,
CBS 115694 and CMW
9058, and South African isolates CMW 9115, CMW 9188, CMW 9208, CMW 9215 and
CMW 9896. Sixteen of the 57 putative Ca. pauciramosa did not cross
with the mating tester strains for that species or with any other isolate
included in this study. These included isolates CMW 7578 from Argentina;
CBS 114257,
CBS 116078,
CBS 116076,
CBS 116081, CMW
31505, CMW 31507 and CMW 31508, from Brazil; CMW 7804, CMW 10151 and
CBS 123402 from
Italy, CMW 30814 and CMW 30815 from Kenya; CMW 30817 from New Zealand; CMW
1786 and CMW 30815 from South Africa. The remaining 30 isolates produced
perithecia containing viable ascospores when crossed with the Ca.
pauciramosa mating tester strains and between them. This resulted in 203
successful heterothallic matings (Table
2).
Table 2.
Results of mating studies between isolates of Calonectria
pauciramosa from various geographic regions.
CBS 102296
CBS 110945
CBS 111873
CBS 114861
CBS 115670
CMW 2151
CMW 5683
CMW 7592
CMW 7597
CMW 7600
CMW 7826
CMW 7827
CMW 7828
CMW 7849
CMW 7851
CMW 7852
CMW 8061
CMW 9151
CMW 9172
CMW 10148
CMW 27203
CMW 27206
CMW 27283
CMW 30817
CMW 30818
CMW 30819
CMW 30823
CMW 30873
CMW 30875
CMW 30878
CMW 30879
CBS 102296
-
CBS 110945
+
-
CBS 111873
+
-
-
CBS 114861
+
-
-
-
CBS 115670
-
+
+
+
-
CMW 2151
-
+
+
+
-
-
CMW 5683
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
CMW 7592
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
CMW 7597
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
CMW 7600
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
CMW 7826
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
CMW 7827
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
CMW 7828
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
CMW 7849
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
CMW 7851
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 7852
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 8061
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 9151
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 9172
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 10148
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 27203
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 27206
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 27283
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 30817
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 30818
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 30819
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CMW 30823
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
CMW 30873
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
CMW 30875
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
CMW 30878
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
CMW 30879
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
Isolates in bold indicate Ca. pauciramosa mating tester strains. +
indicates formation of perithecia with viable ascospores; - indicates no
perithecial formation
Results of mating studies between isolates of Calonectria
pauciramosa from various geographic regions.Isolates in bold indicate Ca. pauciramosa mating tester strains. +
indicates formation of perithecia with viable ascospores; - indicates no
perithecial formationAmplicons of approx. 500 bp were generated for the BT and TEF-1α gene
regions and those for the HIS3 region were approx. 450 bp. Comparing the tree
topologies of the 70 % reciprocal bootstrap trees indicated no conflicts.
Subsequently, the datasets were combined and this resulted in a data set
consisting of 1 529 characters including gaps. Of these characters, 1 151 were
constant and parsimony-uninformative. The 378 parsimony-informative characters
included in the parsimony analyses yielded eight most parsimonious trees (TL =
993, CI = 0.732, RI = 0.903, RC = 0.661), one of which is presented
(Fig. 1). For Bayesian
analyses, a HKY+I model was selected for BT, GTR+I+G model for HIS3 and a
GTR+G model for TEF-1α and incorporated into the analyses. The consensus
tree obtained for the Bayesian analyses confirmed the tree topology obtained
with parsimony as well as bootstrap support
(Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
One of eight most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with
1 000 random addition of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α sequence
alignments. Scale bar shows 10 changes and bootstrap support values from 1 000
replicates are shown above the nodes in bold. Bayesian posterior probability
values are indicated below the nodes. Red lines indicate bootstrap support
values of 100 and posterior probability values of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus and Bayesian consensus tree. The
tree was rooted to Ca. colombiensis
(CBS 112221) and
Ca. chinensis
(CBS 112744).
Mating tester strains of Ca. pauciramosa used in this study are
indicated in bold.
The majority of the Ca. pauciramosa isolates grouped together to
form a monophyletic cluster with a bootstrap (BP) value of 100 and a Bayesian
posterior probability (PP) value of 1.00. Within this cluster, two separate
clades could be distinguished. The first (BP = 66, PP = 0.92) represented
isolates obtained from South Africa (Table
1) and analyses of the SNP's
(Table 3) showed one fixed
allele for BT, two for HIS3 and one indel for TEF-1α. The second clade
(BP = 97, PP = 1.00) represented isolates from Italy
(Table 1) that were closely
related to Ca. pauciramosa and have a number of shared fixed
polymorphisms; five BT and two HIS3 (Table
3). Isolates from Colombia
(Table 1) grouped together (BP
= 100, PP = 1.00), separate from the Ca. pauciramosa cluster and SNP
analyses show that six BT, 13 HIS3 and nine TEF-1α shared fixed alleles
including three indels are characteristic for this group
(Table 3). These isolates were
closely related to Ca. spathulata. Isolates from Brazil grouped
together with isolate CBS
230.51 (ex-type of Cy. brasiliensis; BP = 100, PP =
1.00), closely related to Ca. morganii and Ca. insularis,
but separate from both of these species. Analyses of the SNP's for the
isolates from Brazil compared to Ca. morganii and Ca.
insularis also show several fixed alleles for these isolates, which
include the ex-type culture of Cy. brasiliensis
(CBS 230.51)
(Table 4). The DNA sequence
data for the three gene regions used in the present study showed 16 fixed
alleles between Cy. brasiliensis, Ca. insularis and Ca.
morganii (Table 4). An
additional 10 fixed alleles were shared between Cy. brasiliensis and
Ca. insularis and distinguished both species from Ca.
morganii.
Table 3.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's)1 from the
β-tubulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor-1α sequence
data of Calonectria isolates from Colombia, Italy and South
Africa.
Table 4.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's)1 from the sequence data
if β-tubulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor-1α of
Ca. brasiliensis, Ca. insulare and Ca. morganii used in this
study.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's)1 from the
β-tubulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor-1α sequence
data of Calonectria isolates from Colombia, Italy and South
Africa.Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's)1 from the sequence data
if β-tubulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor-1α of
Ca. brasiliensis, Ca. insulare and Ca. morganii used in this
study.Isolates CMW 9115, CMW 9188, CMW 9208, CMW 9215 and CMW 9896 represent a
distinct species closely related to Ca. pauciramosa, based on
phylogenetic inference. Mating studies also showed that these isolates have a
homothallic mating system, distinguishing them from Ca. pauciramosa.
A similar situation was found for the isolates
CBS 111136,
CBS 115127,
CBS 115638 and
CBS 115694 from
Colombia and they are also treated as a new species based on their homothallic
mating system and phylogenetic inference. Furthermore, isolates
CBS 123402, CMW
7804 and CMW 10151 from Italy are closely related to Ca. pauciramosa
and failed to cross with the mating tester strains of that species.
Morphological observations and DNA sequence data indicate that these isolates
represent an undescribed taxon.Species of Cylindrocladium (1892) represent anamorph states of
Calonectria (1867) (Rossman
). In this study, these fungi are described as
new species of Calonectria, which represents the older generic name.
This is irrespective whether the teleomorph states of these fungi have been
found or not and follows the approach of Lombard et al.
(2009,
2010).(Bat. & Cif.) L. Lombard, M.J.
Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB 515110.
Fig. 2.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium brasiliensis (Bat. & Cif.) Peerally, (as
braziliensis) CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria 427.
1974.
Fig. 2.
Calonectria brasiliensis. A–B. Macroconidiophores.
C–G. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. H–K. Ellipsoidal to obpyriform vesicles. L–M.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
≡ Cylindrocladium scoparium var. brasiliensis Bat.
& Cif., (as brasiliense) Boletim de SA.I.C. Pernambuco 18:
188–191. 1951.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing a
penicillate suite of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles. Stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 63–103 ×
7–14 μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous,
204–266 μm long, 6–7 μm wide at the apical septum,
terminating in an ellipsoidal to obpyriform vesicle, 7–11 μm diam.
Conidiogenous apparatus 58–90 μm long, and 81–103
μm wide; primary branches aseptate or 1-septate, 25–34 ×
5–8 μm; secondary branches aseptate, 14–25 × 4–7
μm; tertiary branches aseptate, 8–20 × 3–5 μm, each
terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides; phialides doliiform to
reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 8–12 × 2–4 μm; apex with
minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(35–)36–40(–41) × 3–5 μm (av. = 38 ×
3.5 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Megaconidia and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Brazil, Ceara State,
Eucalyptus sp., Sept. 1948, T.R. Ciferri, ex-type culture
CBS 230.51 = IMI
299576 = CMW 23671; Aracruz, Eucalyptus sp., June 1998, A.C. Alfenas,
CBS 114257 = CMW
32949; Rio de Janeiro, Corymbia citriodora sub. sp.
citriodora, A.O. Carvalho,
CBS 116078 = CMW
32950; Champion nursery, Eucalyptus sp., P.W. Crous, CPC 602 = CMW
31507; Aracruz, Eucalyptus sp., P.W. Crous, CPC 1943 = CMW 31508.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing (30–45 mm
diam after 7 d) with optimal growth temperature at 25 °C (growth at
10–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber to sepia-brown after 7 d; sparse
white aerial mycelium with sparse sporulation; chlamydospores moderate
throughout the medium, forming microsclerotia.Substrate: Eucalyptus spp.Distribution: Brazil.Notes: Based on morphological observations, Crous & Wingfield
(1994) reduced Ca.
brasiliensis to synonymy with Ca. morganii. However,
phylogenetic inference in this study has shown that the ex-type culture of
Ca. brasiliensis (CBS
230.51) is distinct from Ca. morganii
(CBS 110666,
CBS 119669,
CBS 119670 and CMW
31506). Morphological observations in this study also indicated that conidia
of Ca. brasiliensis (av. 38 × 3.5 μm) are smaller than those
of Ca. morganii (av. 45 × 4 μm). Calonectria
brasiliensis only produces up to three branches per conidiophore, whereas
Ca. morganii can have up to six branches per conidiophore.One of eight most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with
1 000 random addition of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α sequence
alignments. Scale bar shows 10 changes and bootstrap support values from 1 000
replicates are shown above the nodes in bold. Bayesian posterior probability
values are indicated below the nodes. Red lines indicate bootstrap support
values of 100 and posterior probability values of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus and Bayesian consensus tree. The
tree was rooted to Ca. colombiensis
(CBS 112221) and
Ca. chinensis
(CBS 112744).
Mating tester strains of Ca. pauciramosa used in this study are
indicated in bold.Calonectria brasiliensis. A–B. Macroconidiophores.
C–G. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. H–K. Ellipsoidal to obpyriform vesicles. L–M.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.L. Lombard, Crous & M.J. Wingf.,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515065,
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Calonectria colombiana. A. Perithecium. B. Ostiolar region of
perithecium. C. Vertical section through perithecium, showing wall structure.
D–E. Asci. F–H. Ascospores. I–M. Macroconidiophores.
N–Q. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. R–V. Obpyriform to ellipsoid vesicles. W–X.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars: A = 70 μm, B–C = 30 μm,
other scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to Colombia, the country this fungus was
isolated from.Telomorpha Calonectriae pauciramosa similis, sed ascosporis
brevioribus, (28–)31–36(–40) × 3–5 μm (in
medio 34 × 4 μm). Culturae homothallicae. Anamorpha
Cylindrocladio pauciramoso simile, sed vesiculis obpyriforme vel
fusiforme (8–12 μm diam.) et conidiis maioribus
(33–)35–39(–40) × 3–4 μm, in medio 37 ×
3 μm.Calonectria colombiana. A. Perithecium. B. Ostiolar region of
perithecium. C. Vertical section through perithecium, showing wall structure.
D–E. Asci. F–H. Ascospores. I–M. Macroconidiophores.
N–Q. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. R–V. Obpyriform to ellipsoid vesicles. W–X.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars: A = 70 μm, B–C = 30 μm,
other scale bars = 10 μm.Perithecia solitary or in groups, orange to red, becoming
red-brown with age; in section, apex and body yellow to orange, base
red-brown, sub-globose to ovoid, 270–410 μm high, 175–285 μm
diam, body turning dark red, and base dark red-brown (KOH+). Perithecial walls
rough, consisting of 2 thick-walled layers: outside layer of textura
globulosa, 24–90 μm wide; becoming more compressed towards inner
layer of textura angularis, 18–22 μm wide; becoming
thin-walled and hyaline towards the center, outer cells, 38–55 ×
16–40 μm; inner cells, 3–12 × 3–7 μm:
perithecial base up to 114 μm wide; consisting of dark red, angular cells;
merging with an erumpent stroma, cells of the outer wall layer continuing into
the pseudoparenchymatous cells of the erumpent stroma. Asci 8-spored,
clavate, 87–162 × 12–18 μm, tapering to a long thin
stalk. Ascospores aggregated in the upper third of the ascus,
hyaline, gluttulate, fusoid with rounded ends, straight to slightly curved,
1-septate, not or slightly constricted at the septum,
(28–)31–36(–40) × 3–5 μm (av. = 34 × 4
μm). Cultures homothallic. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing a
penicillate suite of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles. Stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 45–126 ×
6–9 μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 143–173
μm long, 5–7 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in an
obpyriform to ellipsoid vesicle, 8–12 μm diam. Conidiogenous
apparatus 38–115 μm long, and 35–91 μm wide; primary
branches aseptate or 1-septate, 19–37 × 5–8 μm; secondary
branches aseptate, 9–17 × 4–5 μm; tertiary and additional
branches (–4), aseptate, 8–13 × 3–4 μm, each
terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides; phialides doliiform to
reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 9–12 × 3–4 μm; apex with
minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(33–)35–39(–40) × 3–4 μm (av. = 37 × 3
μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Megaconidia and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Colombia, La Selva, from soil, June
1995, M.J. Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60295, holotype of Calonectria
colombiana, cultures ex-type
CBS 115127 = CMW
30871 = CPC 1160; La Selva, June 1995, M.J. Wingfield,
CBS 111041 = CMW
30767 = CPC 1163; La Selva, June 1995, M.J. Wingfield,
CBS 111136 = CMW
30812 = CPC 1151; La Selva, June 1995, M.J. Wingfield,
CBS 115638 = CMW
30766 = CPC 1161 (Herb. PREM 60296); La Selva, June 1995, M.J. Wingfield,
CBS 115694 = CMW
30813 = CPC 1162, CMW 9058.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing (35–55 mm
diam after 7 d) with optimal growth temperature at 25 °C (growth at
10–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber to sepia-brown after 7 d; abundant
white aerial mycelium with sparse sporulation; chlamydospores extensive
throughout the medium, forming microsclerotia.Substrate: Soil.Distribution: Colombia.Notes: Isolates of Ca. colombiana were previously
regarded as either Ca. pauciramosa or Ca. scoparia
(Crous 2002) based on the
morphological similarity of the anamorph states of these species. Based on
macroconidial dimensions, Ca. colombiana (av. 37 × 3 μm) can
be distinguished from Ca. pauciramosa (av. 50 × 4.5 μm) and
Ca. scoparia (av. 60 × 4.5 μm) in having smaller, 1-septate
macroconidia. Both Ca. pauciramosa and Ca. scoparia have a
biallelic, heterothallic mating system (Schoch et al.
1999,
2001), whereas Ca.
colombiana is homothallic.L. Lombard, Crous & M.J. Wingf.,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515066,
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Calonectria polizzii. A–E. Macroconidiophores. F–L.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform
phialides. M–P. Obpyriform to ellipsoid vesicles. Q–R. One-septate
macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: The name honours Prof. dr. Giancarlo Polizzi, who
isolated the fungus in Italy.Teleomorpha ignota. Cylindrocladio pauciramoso simile, sed
vesiculis clavato vel obpyriforme (6–9 μm diam.) et conidiis
maioribus (31–)32–42(–49) × 3–5 μm, in medio
37 × 4 μm.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing a
penicillate suite of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles. Stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 58–108 ×
5–7 μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 111–167
μm long, 5–6 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in an
obpyriform to ellipsoid vesicle, 6–9 μm diam. Conidiogenous
apparatus 27–57 μm long, and 28–51 μm wide; primary
branches aseptate or 1-septate, 15–35 × 4–6 μm; secondary
branches aseptate, 12–26 × 3–5 μm; tertiary branches
aseptate, 10–15 × 4–5 μm, each terminal branch producing
2–6 phialides; phialides doliiform to reniform, hyaline, aseptate,
8–13 × 3–4 μm; apex with minute periclinal thickening and
inconspicuous collarette. Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both
ends, straight, (31–)32–42(–49) × 3–5 μm (av.
= 37 × 4 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in
parallel cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Megaconidia and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Italy, Sicily, Carrubba, on Arbutus
unedo, 1997, G. Polizzi, Herb. PREM 60297, holotype of
Calonectria polizzii, cultures ex-type
CBS 123402 = CMW
30872; Sicily, on Callistemon citrinus, 1997, G. Polizzi, CMW 7804 =
CPC 2681 = CBS
125270; Sicily, on Callistemon citrinus, 1997, G.
Polizzi, CMW 10151 = CPC 2771 =
CBS 125271 (Herb.
PREM 60298).Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing (35–40 mm
diam after 7 d) with optimal growth temperature at 25 °C (growth at
10–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber to sepia-brown after 7 d; abundant
white aerial mycelium with sparse sporulation; chlamydospores extensive
throughout the medium, forming microsclerotia.Substrates: Arbutus unedo, Callistemon citrinus.Distribution: Italy.Notes: Calonectria polizzii is morphologically similar to
Ca. pauciramosa and Ca. zuluensis. The macroconidia of
Ca. polizzii (av. 37 × 4 μm) are smaller to those of Ca.
pauciramosa (av. 50 × 4.5 μm). Mating tests also showed that
Ca. polizzii does not mate with either of the tester strains of
Ca. pauciramosa (Schoch ) used in this study. However, the isolates of
Ca. polizzii tested might represent a single mating type, or might
have lost their ability to mate, and further studies incorporating more
isolates will be required to confirm this.L. Lombard, Crous & M.J. Wingf.,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515067,
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Calonectria zuluensis. A. Perithecium. B. A vertical section
through a perithecium, showing the wall layers. C–D. Asci. E–G.
Ascospores. H–L. Macroconidiophores. M–P. Conidiogenous apparatus
with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform phialides. Q–U.
Ellipsoid to obpyriform vesicles. V–W. One-septate macroconidia. Scale
bars: A = 70 μm, B = 30 μm, other scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, the
province were the fungus was isolated.Telomorpha Calonectriae pauciramosa similis, sed ascosporis
brevioribus, (26–)29–34(–38) × 4–5 μm (in
medio 32 × 4 μm). Culturae homothallicae. Anamorpha
Cylindrocladio pauciramoso simile, sed vesiculis clavato vel
obpyriforme (6–10 μm diam) et conidiis maioribus
(31–)34–38(–40) × 3–5 μm, in medio 36 ×
4 μm.Calonectria polizzii. A–E. Macroconidiophores. F–L.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniformphialides. M–P. Obpyriform to ellipsoid vesicles. Q–R. One-septate
macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.Calonectria zuluensis. A. Perithecium. B. A vertical section
through a perithecium, showing the wall layers. C–D. Asci. E–G.
Ascospores. H–L. Macroconidiophores. M–P. Conidiogenous apparatus
with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform phialides. Q–U.
Ellipsoid to obpyriform vesicles. V–W. One-septate macroconidia. Scale
bars: A = 70 μm, B = 30 μm, other scale bars = 10 μm.Perithecia solitary or in groups, orange to red, becoming
red-brown with age; in section apex and body yellow to orange, base red-brown,
sub-globose to ovoid, 292–394 μm high, 170–285 μm diam, body
turning dark red, and base dark red-brown (KOH+). Perithecial walls rough,
consisting of 2 thick-walled layers: outside layer of textura
globulosa, 30–80 μm wide; becoming more compressed towards inner
layer of textura angularis, 20–22 μm wide; becoming
thin-walled and hyaline towards the center, outer cells, 40–50 ×
18–40 μm; inner cells, 4–12 × 3–5 μm:
perithecial base up to 116 μm wide; consisting of dark red, angular cells;
merging with an erumpent stroma, cells of the outer wall layer continuing into
the pseudoparenchymatous cells of the erumpent stroma. Asci 8-spored,
clavate, 92–140 × 10–16 μm, tapering to a long thin
stalk. Ascospores aggregate in the upper third of the ascus, hyaline,
gluttulate, fusoid with rounded ends, straight to slightly curved, 1-septate,
not or slightly constricted at the septum, (26–)29–34(–38)
× 4–5 μm (av. = 32 × 4 μm). Cultures homothallic.
Conidiophores with a stipe bearing penicillate clusters of fertile
branches, stipe extensions, and terminal vesicles. Stipe septate,
hyaline, smooth, 57–84 × 6–9 μm; stipe extensions
septate, straight to flexuous, 110–171 μm long, 5–8 μm wide
at the apical septum, terminating in ellipsoid to obpyriform vesicles,
6–10 μm diam. Conidiogenous apparatus 35–67 μm
long, and 37–70 μm wide; primary branches aseptate or 1-septate,
16–28 × 4–6 μm; secondary branches aseptate, 11–20
× 3–5 μm; tertiary branches aseptate, 8–13 ×
3–4 μm, each terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides; phialides
doliiform to reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 10–13 × 3–4 μm;
apex with minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(31–)34–38(–40) × 3–5 μm (av. = 36 × 4
μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Megaconidia and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal,
Kwambonambi, from Eucalyptus grandis clonal cutting, Feb. 2001, L.
Lombard, Herb. PREM 60292, holotype of Calonectria zuluensis,
cultures ex-type CBS
125268 = CMW 9188; KwaZulu-Natal, Kwambonambi, E. grandis
× urophylla hybrid cutting, Feb. 2001, L. Lombard, CMW 9115,
CMW 9208 (Herb. PREM 60293), CMW 9215, Pietermarizburg, E. grandis
× urophylla hybrid cutting, Mar. 2001, L. Lombard, CMW 9896 =
CBS 125272.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing (35–40 mm
diam after 7 d) with optimal growth temperature at 25 °C (growth at
10–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber to sepia-brown after 7 d; abundant
white aerial mycelium with sparse sporulation; chlamydospores extensive
throughout the medium, forming microsclerotia.Substrate: Eucalyptus grandis and E. grandis
× urophylla rooted cuttings.Distribution: South Africa.Notes: Calonectria zuluensis can be distinguished from
Ca. pauciramosa and Ca. scoparia based on its homothallic
mating system. Macroconidia of Ca. zuluensis (av. 36 × 4 μm)
are also smaller than those of Ca. pauciramosa (av. 50 × 4.5
μm) and Ca. scoparia (av. 60 × 4.5 μm). This species is
morphologically very similar to Ca. colombiana. However, Ca.
zuluensis can be distinguished from Ca. colombiana based on the
fact that it has broadly clavate to obpyriform vesicles as compared with the
obpyriform to fusiform vesicles in Ca. colombiana. Furthermore,
Ca. zuluensis can easily be distinguished based on phylogenetic
inference.
DISCUSSION
Considerable variation observed amongst isolates of “Ca.
pauciramosa” from different geographical localities was illustrated
in this study. Morphological characteristics, phylogenetic inference and
mating studies revealed the presence of three cryptic species accommodated in
cultures that have collectively been treated as Ca. pauciramosa. This
is consistent with the results of previous studies (Schoch et al.
1999,
2001), which noted variation
within Ca. pauciramosa, although at that time the sample size was
inordinately small to consider the matter further. Schoch et al.
(2001) also noted a high level
of variation among isolates from South America, but concluded that this most
likely reflected diversity consistent with an endemic population.Crous (2002) suggested that
mating isolates with recognised mating tester strains represented an important
step in identifying isolates of Ca. pauciramosa. Various studies
(Crous ,
Crous & Wingfield 1994,
Crous ,
Schoch et al. 1999,
2001,
Crous 2002) have used CLA as
standardised medium to study sexual compatibility amongst isolates of
Cylindrocladium. However, CLA has its limitations in that carnation
leaf pieces are not always available and the present study used both CLA and
MSA amended with sterile tooth picks, which proved to be very successful.
Effective application of the latter technique to induce teleomorphs in culture
has also been achieved for various other plant pathogenic genera, including
Glomerella (Geurber & Correll
2001) and Neonectria
(Halleen ).The descriptions of Ca. colombiana, Ca. zuluensis and Ca.
polizzii add three new species to the Ca. scoparia species
complex. This complex is characterised by species having ellipsoidal to
obpyriform vesicles and producing 1-septate macroconidia
(Schoch ,
Crous 2002). The complex was
previously regarded as having a biallelic, heterothallic mating system (Schoch
et al. 1999,
2001). However, both the newly
described Ca. colombiana and Ca. zuluensis are homothallic.
The occurrence of both heterothallic and homothallic Calonectria
species in a single complex is not unique, having previously been found in the
Ca. kyotensis species complex
(Crous ).Schoch et al.
(2001) considered female
fertility of Ca. pauciramosa, and found variation in BT sequence data
for isolates from Italy. This variation has most likely been captured in the
description of Ca. polizzii in the present study. This new species
has thus been shown as unique based on morphological, phylogenetic inference
and biological characteristics, separating it from Ca. pauciramosa.
Morphologically, Ca. polizzii can be distinguished from Ca.
pauciramosa by its smaller 1-septate macroconidia. Isolates of Ca.
polizzii were also not capable of mating with the Ca.
pauciramosa mating-tester strains or other Ca. pauciramosa
isolates from different geographic regions.Schoch et al.
(2001), noted variation
amongst isolates of Ca. pauciramosa from South America, and suggested
that the fungus could be native to that continent. Results of the present
study, including isolates from Colombia, led to the description of Ca.
colombiana. This fungus is distinct from Ca. pauciramosa in
having a homothallic mating system, smaller macroconidia and quaternary
branches on the conidiophores. Although Ca. insularis also forms
conidiophores with quaternary branches
(Schoch ),
Ca. colombiana can easily be distinguished from it based on DNA
sequence comparisons and its homothallic mating system.More than eight species of Calonectria have been recorded from
South Africa (Crous , Crous , Schoch , Crous 2002)
and the description of Ca. zuluensis adds another species to those
already reported from the country. Calonectria zuluensis has a
homothallic mating system, which is different from Ca. pauciramosa
with a biallelic, heterothallic mating system
(Schoch ).
The two species can also easily be distinguished from each other based on DNA
sequence comparisons.In the analyses of the SNP's for the three gene regions used in this study,
several fixed and shared SNP alleles were found for Ca. colombiana, Ca.
polizzii and Ca. zuluensis. The majority of the fixed SNPs are
shared between Ca. polizzii and Ca. zuluensis, indicating
that these are sibling species, and that genetic isolation between them
occurred recently (Taylor ). For Ca. colombiana, fewer of the fixed SNPs are
shared with Ca. polizzii and Ca. zuluensis, indicating that
speciation occurred less recently than that of Ca. polizzii and
Ca. zuluensis. These three species do not share the same alleles with
Ca. pauciramosa, clearly distinguishing it from them.Calonectria brasiliensis has been elevated to species level based
on phylogenetic inference. Although Peerally
(1974) indicated that the
macroconidia of Ca. brasiliensis (24–38 × 2–3
μm) are smaller than those of Ca. morganii (av. 45 × 4
μm), Crous & Wingfield
(1994) reduced Ca.
brasiliensis to synonymy under Ca. morganii, based on similar
conidial dimensions and vesicle morphology observed in culture. It is
possible, however, that the original ex-type strain of Ca.
brasiliensis was in fact morphologically degenerated, appearing atypical
for the species. Several isolates from Brazil, previously identified as
Ca. pauciramosa, grouped with the ex-type strain of Ca.
brasiliensis (CBS
230.51). Previous DNA sequence comparisons and mating studies with
Ca. morganii (Crous , Overmeyer
, Schoch et al.
2000,
2001) failed to include the
ex-type strain CBS
230.51 of Ca. brasiliensis, as this species was seen as a
synonym of Ca. morganii (Crous
2002).This study has shown the importance of combining morphological, biological
and phylogenetic data to identify cryptic species of Calonectria.
Although the biological species concept is regarded as insufficient for this
purpose and needs to be clearly defined in Calonectria
(Crous 2002), this study has
shown that it has some use in identifying cryptic species within Ca.
pauciramosa. The presence of homothallic and heterothallic mating
strategies in closely related fungi is interesting and could well provide
another opportunity to analyse the genetics of mating systems in ascomycetes.
This study has shown, however, that morphology in combination with
phylogenetic inference provides the most useful approach to identify cryptic
species in Calonectria (Lombard
). The present study has also shown the
importance of the multi-gene approach in studying the phylogenetic
relationships of phenotypic closely related Calonectria spp.
Authors: J W Taylor; D J Jacobson; S Kroken; T Kasuga; D M Geiser; D S Hibbett; M C Fisher Journal: Fungal Genet Biol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 3.495
Authors: Francois Halleen; Hans-Josef Schroers; Johannes Z Groenewald; Cecília Rego; Helena Oliveira; Pedro W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Michael J Wingfield; Z Wilhelm De Beer; Bernard Slippers; Brenda D Wingfield; Johannes Z Groenewald; Lorenzo Lombard; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: Y Marin-Felix; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; Q Chen; S Marincowitz; I Barnes; K Bensch; U Braun; E Camporesi; U Damm; Z W de Beer; A Dissanayake; J Edwards; A Giraldo; M Hernández-Restrepo; K D Hyde; R S Jayawardena; L Lombard; J Luangsa-Ard; A R McTaggart; A Y Rossman; M Sandoval-Denis; M Shen; R G Shivas; Y P Tan; E J van der Linde; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; J Q Zhang; Y Zhang; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; M J Wingfield; R Cheewangkoon; A J Carnegie; T I Burgess; B A Summerell; J Edwards; P W J Taylor; J Z Groenewald Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; J J Luangsa-Ard; M J Wingfield; A J Carnegie; M Hernández-Restrepo; L Lombard; J Roux; R W Barreto; I G Baseia; J F Cano-Lira; M P Martín; O V Morozova; A M Stchigel; B A Summerell; T E Brandrud; B Dima; D García; A Giraldo; J Guarro; L F P Gusmão; P Khamsuntorn; M E Noordeloos; S Nuankaew; U Pinruan; E Rodríguez-Andrade; C M Souza-Motta; R Thangavel; A L van Iperen; V P Abreu; T Accioly; J L Alves; J P Andrade; M Bahram; H-O Baral; E Barbier; C W Barnes; E Bendiksen; E Bernard; J D P Bezerra; J L Bezerra; E Bizio; J E Blair; T M Bulyonkova; T S Cabral; M V Caiafa; T Cantillo; A A Colmán; L B Conceição; S Cruz; A O B Cunha; B A Darveaux; A L da Silva; G A da Silva; G M da Silva; R M F da Silva; R J V de Oliveira; R L Oliveira; J T De Souza; M Dueñas; H C Evans; F Epifani; M T C Felipe; J Fernández-López; B W Ferreira; C N Figueiredo; N V Filippova; J A Flores; J Gené; G Ghorbani; T B Gibertoni; A M Glushakova; R Healy; S M Huhndorf; I Iturrieta-González; M Javan-Nikkhah; R F Juciano; Ž Jurjević; A V Kachalkin; K Keochanpheng; I Krisai-Greilhuber; Y-C Li; A A Lima; A R Machado; H Madrid; O M C Magalhães; P A S Marbach; G C S Melanda; A N Miller; S Mongkolsamrit; R P Nascimento; T G L Oliveira; M E Ordoñez; R Orzes; M A Palma; C J Pearce; O L Pereira; G Perrone; S W Peterson; T H G Pham; E Piontelli; A Pordel; L Quijada; H A Raja; E Rosas de Paz; L Ryvarden; A Saitta; S S Salcedo; M Sandoval-Denis; T A B Santos; K A Seifert; B D B Silva; M E Smith; A M Soares; S Sommai; J O Sousa; S Suetrong; A Susca; L Tedersoo; M T Telleria; D Thanakitpipattana; N Valenzuela-Lopez; C M Visagie; M Zapata; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: C Glienke; O L Pereira; D Stringari; J Fabris; V Kava-Cordeiro; L Galli-Terasawa; J Cunnington; R G Shivas; J Z Groenewald; P W Crous Journal: Persoonia Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: J de Gruyter; J H C Woudenberg; M M Aveskamp; G J M Verkley; J Z Groenewald; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 16.097