L Lombard1, P W Crous, B D Wingfield, M J Wingfield. 1. Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Tree Protection Co-operative Programme, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Abstract
Species of Calonectria are important plant pathogens, several of which have a worldwide distribution. Contemporary taxonomic studies on these fungi have chiefly relied on DNA sequence comparisons of the beta-tubulin gene region. Despite many new species being described, there has been no phylogenetic synthesis for the group since the last monographic study almost a decade ago. In the present study, the identity of a large collection of Calonectria isolates from various geographic regions was determined using morphological and DNA sequence comparisons. This resulted in the discovery of seven new species; Ca. densa, Ca. eucalypti, Ca. humicola, Ca. orientalis, Ca. pini, Ca. pseudoscoparia and Ca. sulawesiensis, bringing the total number of currently accepted Calonectria species to 68. A multigene phylogeny was subsequently constructed for all available Calonectria spp., employing seven gene regions, namely actin, beta-tubulin, calmodulin, histone H3, the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal RNA, 28S large subunit RNA gene and translation elongation 1-alpha. Based on these data 13 phylogenetic groups could be distinguished within the genus Calonectria that correlated with morphological features. Dichotomous and synoptic keys to all Calonectria spp. currently recognised are also provided.
Species of Calonectria are important plant pathogens, several of which have a worldwide distribution. Contemporary taxonomic studies on these fungi have chiefly relied on DNA sequence comparisons of the beta-tubulin gene region. Despite many new species being described, there has been no phylogenetic synthesis for the group since the last monographic study almost a decade ago. In the present study, the identity of a large collection of Calonectria isolates from various geographic regions was determined using morphological and DNA sequence comparisons. This resulted in the discovery of seven new species; Ca. densa, Ca. eucalypti, Ca. humicola, Ca. orientalis, Ca. pini, Ca. pseudoscoparia and Ca. sulawesiensis, bringing the total number of currently accepted Calonectria species to 68. A multigene phylogeny was subsequently constructed for all available Calonectriaspp., employing seven gene regions, namely actin, beta-tubulin, calmodulin, histone H3, the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal RNA, 28S large subunit RNA gene and translation elongation 1-alpha. Based on these data 13 phylogenetic groups could be distinguished within the genus Calonectria that correlated with morphological features. Dichotomous and synoptic keys to all Calonectriaspp. currently recognised are also provided.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cylindrocladium; DNA phylogeny; sexual compatibility; taxonomy
The genus Calonectria (Ca.) was first described in 1867,
with Ca. daldiniana as the type. This species was later reduced to
synonymy with Ca. pyrochroa based on morphological comparisons by
Rossman (1979).
Calonectriaspp. are Euascomycetes in the order
Hypocreales (Hibbett , Schoch ) and are characterised by their yellow to dark red
perithecia, with scaly to warty ascocarp walls giving rise to long-stalked,
clavate asci with 1–multi-septate ascospores and
Cylindrocladium (Cy.) anamorphs
(Rossman 1993,
Crous 2002,
Lombard ). The genus Cylindrocladium was described by Morgan
(1892), and is characterised
by branched conidiophores with stipe extensions terminating in characteristic
vesicles and producing cylindrical, 1–multi-septate conidia
(Crous & Wingfield 1994,
Crous 2002). Morphologically,
the anamorph provides the greatest number of distinguishing characters for
Calonectria and it is also the state most frequently encountered in
nature (Peerally 1991,
Crous & Wingfield 1994,
Schoch ,
Crous 2002). Consequently,
species of Calonectria are primarily distinguished by their anamorph
characters, especially vesicle shape, stipe extension length, conidial
septation, and dimensions on a standardised medium under defined growth
conditions (Boesewinkel 1982,
Peerally 1991,
Crous & Wingfield 1994,
Crous 2002). Despite, the use
of standardised conditions, taxonomic confusion can result because some
intraspecific variation in vesicle shape and conidial dimension is common
(Crous & Peerally 1996,
Crous ).The reliability of vesicle shape as a distinguishing morphological
character has been questioned (Sober &
Alfieri 1972, Hunter &
Barnett 1978, Rossman
1983), although Crous et al.
(1992) demonstrated
experimentally that the shape of this structure can be influenced by the
osmotic potential of the medium and the age of the culture, but that it
remains a reliable morphological feature if these aspects are standardised. In
the original description of Ca. morganii (= Cy. scoparium),
the type of the anamorph, Morgan
(1892) failed to include
details of the stipe extension and terminal vesicle, which is a defining
characteristic in distinguishing anamorphs of Calonectria
(Boesewinkel 1982,
Peerally 1991,
Crous & Wingfield 1994,
Crous 2002).Calonectriaspp. produce three different morphological forms of
conidia, of which the macroconidia are present in all but Ca.
multiseptata (Peerally
1991, Crous & Wingfield
1994, Crous et al. 1998b,
Crous 2002). Mega- and
microcondia are less frequently encountered and these are not regarded as
important characters to distinguish between species
(Sober 1971,
Crous & Wingfield 1994,
Crous & Seifert 1998,
Crous 2002). Similar to vesicle
shape, significant variability can occur in the production of all conidial
types, so that this feature alone is not always a reliable taxonomic character
to define species.Both homothallic and heterothallic mating systems are found amongst species
of Calonectria (Alfieri , Schubert , Crous &
Wingfield 1994, Crous
2002). Heterothallic Calonectriaspp. have a biallelic
heterothallic mating system with the female structures (protoperithecia)
spermatised by conidia or hyphae of an opposite mating type strain (Schoch
et al. 1999,
2000a,
2001a). Some
Calonectriaspp. have retained the ability to recombine with other
closely related Calonectriaspp., although the progeny from these
crosses have low levels of fertility (Crous
2002). This has complicated the application of the biological
species concept for Calonectria, although it has been useful for some
species (Schoch , Lombard ).Difficulties experienced in morphological identification, have led to
several molecular approaches being employed to identify Calonectriaspp. These include total protein electrophoresis
(Crous ,
El-Gholl ), isozyme electrophoresis
(El-Gholl , El-Gholl , Crous ), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
(Overmeyer , Victor , Schoch , Risède &
Simoneau 2004), restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP)
(Crous ,
Crous ,
Crous ,
Jeng ,
Victor ,
Risède & Simoneau
2001) and DNA hybridisation (Crous et al.
1993a,
1995,
1997,
Victor ).
However, DNA sequence comparisons and associated phylogenetic inference has
had the most significant impact on the taxonomy of the group. It is also most
widely applied in contemporary species descriptions. The 5.8S ribosomal RNA
gene and flanking internally transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences made it
possible for Jeng et al.
(1997) to distinguish between
Cy. scoparium and Cy. floridanum isolates. Subsequently, it
was found that this gene region contains few informative characters for
members of the genus (Crous , Schoch , Risède
& Simoneau 2001, Schoch
). As a consequence, this resulted in the
β-tubulin (BT) (Schoch ) and histone H3 (HIS3)
(Kang )
gene regions being widely employed to improve the resolution of phylogenetic
trees for species of Calonectria.The first complete DNA sequence-based phylogenetic study using partial BT
gene sequences (Schoch ) compared phenotypic, biological and phylogenetic species
concepts used in the taxonomy of Calonectria. Results showed that the
genus represents a well resolved monophyletic lineage. Subsequently, combined
DNA sequence data for the ITS, BT and HIS3 gene regions have been used to
resolve taxonomic questions for Calonectria
(Schoch ,
Henricot & Culham 2002,
Crous et al. 2004b,
2006). Other DNA sequences
recently used to distinguish between species include the translation
elongation factor 1–alpha (TEF-1α) and calmodulin (CAL) gene
regions (Crous , Lombard et al.
2009,
2010a,
b). However, sequence data for
these regions on GenBank
(www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
are incomplete for the group, substantially reducing their value.The aim of this study was to consider the identity of a large collection of
previously unidentified Calonectria isolates collected over a five
year period from various parts of the world. Morphological characteristics,
phylogenetic inference and mating compatibility were employed for this
purpose. Subsequently, the phylogenetic relationships between
Calonectriaspp. were re-evaluated by constructing a multigene
phylogeny for seven gene regions and considering these results together with
morphological features for all species in the genus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolates
Plant material showing symptoms of Calonectria infections as well
as soil samples were collected from various geographical regions over a period
of five years. Diseased plant material was placed in moist chambers and
incubated for 48 h at room temperature to induce sporulation. Direct
isolations were made onto malt extract agar (2 % w/v; MEA; Biolab, Midrand,
South Africa) and cultures were incubated for 7 d at 25 °C under
continuous near-ultraviolet light. Baiting, using seeds of Medicago
sativa, was applied for the soil samples following the technique of Crous
(2002). For each isolate,
single conidial cultures were prepared on MEA. Representative strains are
maintained in the culture collection (CMW) of the Forestry and Agricultural
Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
and the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
(Table 1).
Table 1.
Isolates of Calonectria spp. studied.
Species
Isolate
number1
Other
collections1
GenBank accession
nr.2
Reference3
ACT
BT
CAL
HIS3
ITS
LSU
TEF-1α
Ca. acicola
CBS 114812
GQ280424
DQ190590
GQ267359
DQ190692
GQ280546
GQ280668
GQ267291
Gadgil & Dick (2004)
CBS
114813T
CMW 30996
GQ280425
DQ190591
GQ267360
DQ190693
GQ280547
GQ280669
GQ267292
Ca. angustata
CBS
109065T
CMW 30990 = CPC 2347 = P99-0454
GQ280426
AF207543
GQ267361
DQ190696
GQ280548
GQ280671
FJ918551
Crous (2002)
CBS 109169
CMW 30983 = CPC 3152 = P99-1321
GQ280427
DQ190593
GQ267362
DQ190695
GQ280549
GQ280670
FJ918552
Ca. asiatica
CBS 112711
CPC 3898 = SFE 744
GQ280429
AY725613
AY725738
AY725655
GQ280551
GQ280673
AY725702
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS
114073T
CMW 23782 = CPC 3900 = SFE 726
GQ280428
AY725616
AY725741
AY725658
GQ280550
GQ280672
AY725705
Ca. australiensis
CBS
112954T
CMW 23669 = CPC 4714
GQ280430
DQ190596
GQ267363
DQ190699
GQ280552
GQ280674
GQ267293
Crous et al. (2006)
Ca. avesiculata
CBS
313.92T
CMW 23670 = CPC 2373 = ATCC 38226
GQ280431
AF333392
GQ267364
DQ190620
GQ280553
GQ280675
GQ267294
Crous (2002)
Ca. brachiatica
CBS
123700T
CMW 25298
GQ280433
FJ696388
GQ267366
FJ696396
GQ280555
GQ280677
GQ267296
Lombard et al. (2009)
CMW 25302
GQ280432
FJ716708
GQ267365
FJ716712
GQ280554
GQ280676
GQ267295
Ca. brassicae
CBS 111478
CMW 30981
GQ280455
DQ190611
GQ267383
DQ190719
GQ280577
GQ280699
FJ918567
Crous (2002)
CBS
111869T
CMW 30982 = CPC 2409 = PC 551197
GQ280454
AF232857
GQ267382
DQ190720
GQ280576
GQ280698
FJ918566
Ca. brasiliensis
CBS
230.51T
CMW 23670 = CPC 2390
GQ280502
GQ267241
GQ267421
GQ267259
GQ280624
GQ280746
GQ267328
Lombard et al. (2009c)
CBS 114257
CMW 32949 = CPC 1944
GQ280503
GQ267242
GQ267422
GQ267260
GQ280625
GQ280747
GQ267329
Ca. canadensis
CBS
110817T
CMW 23673 = CPC 499
GQ280434
AF348212
AY725743
AF348228
GQ280556
GQ280678
GQ267297
Crous (2002)
Ca. cerciana
CBS
123693T
CMW 25309
GQ280437
FJ918510
GQ267369
FJ918528
GQ280559
GQ280681
FJ918559
Lombard et al.
(2010c)
CBS 123695
CMW 25290
GQ280438
FJ918511
GQ267370
FJ918529
GQ280560
GQ280682
FJ918560
Ca. chinensis
CBS 112744
CMW 30986 = CPC 4104
GQ280440
AY725618
AY725746
AY725660
GQ280562
GQ280684
AY725709
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS
114827T
CMW 23674 = CPC 4101
GQ280390
AY725619
AY725747
AY725661
GQ280561
GQ280683
AY725710
Ca. citri
CBS
186.36T
CMW 23675
GQ280441
AF333393
GQ267371
GQ267247
GQ280563
GQ280685
GQ267299
Crous (2002)
Ca. clavata
CBS
114557T
CMW 23690 = CPC 2536 = ATCC 66389
GQ280449
AF333396
GQ267377
DQ190623
GQ280571
GQ280693
GQ267305
Crous (2002)
CBS
114666T
CMW 30994 = CPC 2537
GQ280450
DQ190549
GQ267378
DQ190624
GQ280572
GQ280694
GQ267306
Ca. colhounii
CBS
293.79T
CMW 30999
GQ280443
DQ190564
GQ267373
DQ190639
GQ280565
GQ280687
GQ267301
Crous (2002)
CBS 114704
GQ280442
DQ190563
GQ267372
DQ190638
GQ280564
GQ280686
GQ267300
Ca. colombiana
CBS
115127T
CMW 30871 = CPC 1160
GQ280538
FJ972423
GQ267455
FJ972442
GQ280660
GQ280782
FJ972492
Lombard et al.
(2010a)
CBS 115638
CMW 30766 = CPC 1161
GQ280539
FJ972422
GQ267456
FJ972441
GQ280661
GQ280783
FJ972491
Ca. colombiensis
CBS
112220T
CMW 23676 = CPC 723
GQ280444
GQ267207
AY725748
AY725662
GQ280566
GQ280688
AY725711
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS 112221
CMW 30985 = CPC 724
GQ280445
AY725620
AY725749
AY725663
GQ280567
GQ280689
AY725712
Crous (2002)
Ca. curvispora
CBS
116159T
CMW 23693
GQ280446
AF333394
GQ267374
AY725664
GQ280568
GQ280690
GQ267302
Crous (2002)
Ca. densa
CBS 125249
CMW 31184
GQ280523
GQ267230
GQ267442
GQ267279
GQ280645
GQ280767
GQ267350
This study
CBS 125250
CMW 31185
GQ280524
GQ267231
GQ267443
GQ267280
GQ280646
GQ280768
GQ267351
CBS
125261T
CMW 31182
GQ280525
GQ267232
GQ267444
GQ267281
GQ280647
GQ280769
GQ267352
Ca. ecuadoriae
CBS 111394
CMW 30980 = CPC 1628
GQ280448
DQ190599
GQ267376
DQ190704
GQ280570
GQ280692
GQ267304
Crous et al. (2006)
CBS
111406T
CMW 23677 = CPC 1635
GQ280447
DQ190600
GQ267375
DQ190705
GQ280569
GQ280691
GQ267303
Ca. eucalypti
CBS 125273
CMW 14890
GQ280510
GQ267217
GQ267429
GQ267266
GQ280632
GQ280754
GQ267337
This study
CBS 125274
CMW 18443
GQ280509
GQ267216
GQ267428
GQ267265
GQ280631
GQ280753
GQ267336
CBS
125275T
CMW18444
GQ280511
GQ267218
GQ267430
GQ267267
GQ280633
GQ280755
GQ267338
CBS 125276
CMW 18445
GQ280512
GQ267219
GQ267431
GQ267268
GQ280634
GQ280756
GQ267339
Ca. gordoniae
CBS 112142
CMW 23694 = CPC 3136 = ATCC 201837
GQ280453
AF449449
GQ267381
DQ190708
GQ280575
GQ280697
GQ267309
Leahy et al. (2000)
Ca. gracilipes
CBS
111141T
GQ280457
DQ190566
GQ267385
DQ190644
GQ280579
GQ280701
GQ267311
Crous (2002)
CBS 115674
GQ280456
AF333406
GQ267384
DQ190645
GQ280578
GQ280700
GQ267310
Ca. gracilis
CBS 111284
GQ280489
DQ190567
GQ267408
DQ190647
GQ280611
GQ280733
GQ267324
Crous (2002)
CBS 111807
GQ280488
AF232858
GQ267407
DQ190646
GQ280610
GQ280734
GQ267323
Ca. hawksworthii
CBS
111870T
CPC 2405 = MUCL 30866
GQ280458
AF333407
GQ267386
DQ190649
GQ280580
GQ280702
FJ918558
Crous (2002)
Ca. hongkongensis
CBS 114711
CMW 30995
GQ280460
AY725621
AY725754
AY725666
GQ280582
GQ280704
AY725716
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS
114828T
GQ280459
AY725622
AY725755
AY725667
GQ280581
GQ280703
AY725717
Ca. humicola
CBS
125251T
CMW 31183
GQ280526
GQ267233
GQ267445
GQ267282
GQ280648
GQ280770
GQ267353
This study
CBS 125252
CMW 31186
GQ280527
GQ267234
GQ267446
GQ267283
GQ280649
GQ280771
GQ267354
CBS 125269
CMW31187
GQ280528
GQ267235
GQ267447
GQ267284
GQ280650
GQ280772
GQ267355
Ca. hurae
CBS 114551
CMW 16720 = CPC 2344
GQ280461
AF333408
GQ267387
DQ190728
GQ280583
GQ280705
FJ918548
Crous (2002)
Ca. ilicicola
CBS
190.50T
CMW 30998 = CPC 2482 = IMI 299389
GQ280483
AY725631
AY725764
AY725676
GQ280605
GQ280727
AY725726
Crous (2002)
CBS 115897
GQ280484
AY725647
GQ267403
GQ267256
GQ280606
GQ280728
AY725729
Ca. indonesiae
CBS
112823T
CMW 23683 = CPC 4508
GQ280463
AY725623
AY725756
AY725668
GQ280585
GQ280707
AY725718
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS 112840
CPC 4547
GQ280464
AY725625
AY725758
AY725670
GQ280586
GQ280708
AY725720
Ca. indusiata
CBS 144.36
CMW 23699
GQ280536
GQ267239
GQ267453
GQ267262
GQ280658
GQ280780
GQ267332
Crous (2002)
CBS 114684
CPC 2446 = UFV 16A
GQ280537
AF232862
GQ267454
DQ190652
GQ280659
GQ280781
GQ267333
Ca. insularis
CBS
114558T
CMW 30991
GQ280465
AF210861
GQ267389
FJ918526
GQ280587
GQ280709
FJ918556
Crous (2002)
CBS 114559
CMW 30992
GQ280466
AF210862
GQ267390
FJ918525
GQ280588
GQ280710
FJ918555
Ca. kyotensis
CBS 170.77
CMW 23679 = IMI 299388
GQ280452
GQ267209
GQ267380
GQ267249
GQ280574
GQ280696
GQ267308
Crous (2002)
CBS 413.67
CMW 23678 = CPC 2391
GQ280451
GQ267208
GQ267379
GQ267248
GQ280573
GQ280695
GQ267307
Ca. leguminum
CBS
728.68T
CMW 23684 = IMI 299578
GQ280467
AF389837
GQ267391
DQ190654
GQ280589
GQ280711
FJ918547
Crous (2002)
Ca. leucothoës
CBS 109166
CMW 30977 = CPC 3612 = P97-2605
GQ280468
FJ918508
GQ267392
FJ918523
GQ280590
GQ280712
FJ918553
Crous (2002)
Ca. macroconidialis
CBS
114880T
CPC 307
GQ280469
AF232855
GQ267393
DQ190655
GQ280591
GQ280713
GQ267313
Crous (2002)
Ca. madagascariensis
CBS 114571
CMW 30993 = CPC 2253
GQ280471
DQ190571
GQ267395
DQ190657
GQ280593
GQ280715
GQ267315
Crous (2002)
CBS
114572T
CMW 23686 = CPC 2252
GQ280470
DQ190572
GQ267394
DQ190658
GQ280592
GQ280714
GQ267314
Ca. malesiana
CBS 112710
CPC 3899
GQ280473
AY725626
AY725759
AY725671
GQ280595
GQ280717
AY725721
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS
112752T
CMW 23687 = CPC 4223
GQ280472
AY725627
AY725760
AY725672
GQ280594
GQ280716
AY725722
Ca. mexicana
CBS
110918T
CMW 9055
GQ280474
AF210863
GQ267396
FJ972460
GQ280596
GQ280718
FJ972526
Crous (2002)
Ca. morganii
CBS 110666
CMW 30978 = P90.1479
GQ280504
FJ918509
GQ267423
FJ918527
GQ280626
GQ280748
FJ9188557
Crous (2002)
Ca. multiphialidica
CBS 112678
CMW 23688
GQ280475
AY725628
AY725761
AY725673
GQ280597
GQ280719
AY725723
Crous et al. (2004b)
Ca. multiseptata
CBS 112682
CMW 23692 = CPC 1589
GQ280476
DQ190573
GQ267397
DQ190659
GQ280598
GQ280720
FJ918535
Crous (2002)
Ca. naviculata
CBS
101121T
CMW 30974
GQ280478
GQ267211
GQ267399
GQ267252
GQ280600
GQ280722
GQ267317
Crous (2002)
CBS 116080
CMW 16723
GQ280477
AF333409
GQ267398
GQ267251
GQ280599
GQ280721
GQ267316
Ca. orientalis
CBS 125258
CMW 20272
GQ280531
GQ267238
GQ267450
GQ267287
GQ280653
GQ280775
GQ267358
This study
CBS 125259
CMW 20273
GQ280530
GQ267237
GQ267449
GQ267286
GQ280652
GQ280774
GQ267357
CBS
125260T
CMW 20291
GQ280529
GQ267236
GQ267448
GQ267285
GQ267651
GQ280773
GQ267356
Ca. ovata
CBS 111299
CMW 16724
GQ280479
GQ267212
GQ267400
GQ267253
GQ280601
GQ280723
GQ267318
Crous (2002)
CBS111307
CMW 30979
GQ280480
AF210868
GQ267401
GQ267254
GQ280602
GQ280724
GQ267319
Ca. pacifica
CBS 109063
CMW 16726 = IMI 35428
GQ280481
GQ267213
AY725762
GQ267255
GQ280603
GQ280725
AY725724
Crous (2002)
CBS 114038
CMW 30988
GQ280482
AY725630
GQ267402
AY725675
GQ280604
GQ280726
GQ267320
Ca. pauciramosa
CMW 5683T
CPC 971
GQ280486
FJ918514
GQ267405
FJ918531
GQ280608
GQ280730
FJ918565
Crous (2002)
CMW30823
CPC 416
GQ280485
FJ918515
GQ280404
FJ918532
GQ280607
GQ280729
FJ918566
Ca. penicilloides
CBS
174.55T
CMW 23696
GQ280487
AF333414
GQ267406
GQ267257
GQ280609
GQ280731
GQ267322
Crous (2002)
Ca. pini
CBS
123698T
CMW 31209
GQ280517
GQ267224
GQ267436
GQ267273
GQ280639
GQ280761
GQ267344
This study
CBS 125523
CMW 31210
GQ280518
GQ267225
GQ267437
GQ267274
GQ280640
GQ280762
GQ267345
Ca. polizzii
CBS 125270
CMW 7804
GQ280544
FJ972417
GQ267461
FJ972436
GQ280666
GQ280788
FJ972486
Lombard et al.
(2010a)
CBS 125271
CMW 10151
GQ280545
FJ972418
GQ267462
FJ972437
GQ280667
GQ280789
FJ972487
Ca. pseudonaviculata
CBS
114417T
CMW 23672
GQ280490
GQ267214
GQ267409
GQ267258
GQ280612
GQ280734
GQ267325
Crous et al. (2002)
Ca. pseudoreteaudii
CBS
123694T
CMW 25310
GQ280492
FJ918504
GQ267411
FJ918519
GQ280614
GQ280736
FJ918541
Lombard et al.
(2010c)
CBS 123696
CMW 25292
GQ280491
FJ918505
GQ267410
FJ918520
GQ280613
GQ280735
FJ918542
Ca. pseudoscoparia
CBS 125254
CMW 15214
GQ280519
GQ267226
GQ267438
GQ267275
GQ280641
GQ280763
GQ267346
This study
CBS 125255
CMW 15215
GQ280520
GQ267227
GQ267439
GQ267276
GQ280642
GQ280764
GQ267347
CBS 125256
CMW 15216
GQ280521
GQ267228
GQ267440
GQ267277
GQ280643
GQ280765
GQ267348
CBS
125257T
CMW 15218
GQ280522
GQ267229
GQ267441
GQ267278
GQ280644
GQ280766
GQ267349
Ca. pseudospathiphylli
CBS
109162T
CMW 30976 = CPC 1623
GQ280493
FJ918513
GQ267412
AF348241
GQ280615
GQ280737
FJ918562
Crous (2002)
Ca. pteridis
CBS
111793T
CMW 16736 = CPC 2372 = ATCC 34395
GQ280494
DQ190578
GQ267413
DQ190679
GQ280616
GQ280738
FJ918563
Crous (2002)
CBS 111871
CMW 30982 = CPC 2443
GQ280495
DQ190579
GQ267414
DQ190680
GQ280617
GQ280739
FJ918564
Ca. pyrochoa
CBS
749.70T
CMW 23682
GQ280462
GQ267210
GQ267388
GQ267250
GQ280584
GQ280706
GQ267312
Crous et al. (2006)
Ca. queenslandica
CBS
112146T
CMW 30604 = CPC 3213
GQ280496
AF389835
GQ267415
FJ918521
GQ280618
GQ280740
FJ918543
Lombard et al.
(2010c)
CBS 112155
CMW 30603 = CPC 3210
GQ280497
AF389834
GQ267416
DQ190667
GQ280619
GQ280741
FJ918544
Ca. reteaudii
CBS 112143
CMW 16738 = CPC 3200
GQ280499
GQ240642
GQ267418
DQ190660
GQ280621
GQ280743
FJ918536
Crous (2002)
CBS
112144T
CMW 30984 = CPC 3201
GQ280498
AF389833
GQ267417
DQ190661
GQ280620
GQ280742
FJ918537
Ca. rumohrae
CBS 109062
CMW 30989 = CPC 1603
GQ280501
AF232873
GQ267420
DQ190676
GQ280623
GQ280745
FJ918550
Crous (2002)
CBS
111431T
CMW 23697 = CPC 1716
GQ280500
AF232871
GQ267419
DQ190675
GQ280622
GQ280744
FJ918549
Ca. scoparia
CMW 31000
CPC 1675 = UFV 117
GQ280435
FJ972426
GQ267367
FJ972476
GQ280557
GQ280679
FJ972525
Crous (2002)
CMW 31001
UFV 126
GQ280436
FJ972427
GQ267368
GQ267246
GQ280558
GQ280680
GQ267246
Ca. spathiphylli
CBS 114540
CMW 16742
GQ280505
AF348214
GQ267424
AF348230
GQ280627
GQ280749
GQ267330
Crous (2002)
CBS 116168
CMW 30997
GQ280506
FJ918512
GQ267425
FJ918530
GQ280628
GQ280750
FJ918561
Ca. spathulata
CBS 555.92
CMW 16744
GQ280508
GQ267215
GQ267427
GQ267261
GQ280630
GQ280752
GQ267331
Crous (2002)
CBS 112689
CMW 16745
GQ280507
AF308463
GQ267426
FJ918524
GQ280629
GQ280751
FJ918554
Ca. sulawesiensis
CBS 125248
CMW 14857
GQ280516
GQ267223
GQ267435
GQ267272
GQ280638
GQ280760
GQ267343
This study
CBS 125253
CMW 14879
GQ280513
GQ267220
GQ267432
GQ267269
GQ280635
GQ280757
GQ267340
CBS
125277T
CMW 14878
GQ280515
GQ267222
GQ267434
GQ267271
GQ280637
GQ280759
GQ267342
CMW 14883
GQ280514
GQ267221
GQ267433
GQ267270
GQ280636
GQ280758
GQ267341
Ca. sumatrensis
CBS
112829T
CMW 23698 = CPC4518
GQ280532
AY725649
AY725771
AY725696
GQ280654
GQ280776
AY725733
Crous et al. (2004b)
CBS 112934
CMW 30987 = CPC 4516
GQ280533
AY725651
AY725773
AY725798
GQ280655
GQ280777
AY725735
Ca. terrae-reginae
CBS
112151T
CMW 30601 = CPC 3202
GQ280534
FJ918506
GQ267451
FJ918522
GQ280656
GQ280778
FJ918545
Lombard et al.
(2010c)
CBS 112634
CMW 30602 = CPC 4233
GQ280535
FJ918507
GQ267452
DQ190668
GQ280657
GQ280779
FJ918546
Ca. variabilis
CBS 112691
CMW 2914
GQ280541
GQ267240
GQ267458
GQ267264
GQ280663
GQ280785
GQ267335
Crous (2002)
CBS 114677
CMW 3187
GQ280540
AF333424
GQ267457
GQ267263
GQ280662
GQ280764
GQ267334
Ca. zuluensis
CBS 125268
CMW 9188T
GQ280542
FJ972414
GQ267459
FJ972433
GQ280664
GQ280786
FJ972483
Lombard et al.
(2010a)
CBS 125272
CMW 9896
GQ280543
FJ972415
GQ267460
FJ972434
GQ280665
GQ280787
FJ972484
CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC:
Pedro Crous working collection housed at CBS; IMI: International Mycological
Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, U.K.; ATCC: American Type
Culture Collection, Virginia, U.S.A.; UFV: Univeridade Federal de
Viçosa, Brazil. 2ACT = Actin, BT = β-tubulin, CAL =
Calmodulin, HIS3 = Histone H3, ITS = Internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and
2 and the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal RNA, LSU = 28S large subunit RNA,
TEF-1α = Translation elongation factor 1-alpha. 3References
used for species descriptions. TEx-type cultures.
Isolates of Calonectriaspp. studied.CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC:
Pedro Crous working collection housed at CBS; IMI: International Mycological
Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, U.K.; ATCC: American Type
Culture Collection, Virginia, U.S.A.; UFV: Univeridade Federal de
Viçosa, Brazil. 2ACT = Actin, BT = β-tubulin, CAL =
Calmodulin, HIS3 = Histone H3, ITS = Internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and
2 and the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal RNA, LSU = 28S large subunit RNA,
TEF-1α = Translation elongation factor 1-alpha. 3References
used for species descriptions. TEx-type cultures.
DNA extraction and amplification
Identification of unknown Calonectria isolates
Total genomic DNA was extracted from 7 d old Calonectria cultures
using the methods presented in Lombard et al.
(2008). Three loci were
amplified and sequenced. These included a fragment of the BT gene region using
primers T1 (O'Donnell & Cigelnik
1997) and CYLTUB1R (Crous
), a fragment of the HIS3 gene region using
primers CYLH3F and CYLH3R (Crous ) and a fragment of the TEF-1α gene region
using primers EF1-728F (Carbone & Kohn
1999) and EF2 (O'Donnell
).
Total genomic DNA was extracted as above. Seven loci were amplified
including the ITS gene region using primers V9G
(De Hoog & van den Ende
1998) and ITS4 (White ); the 28S large subunit RNA gene (LSU) using primers
LR0R (Moncalvo ) and LR5 (Vilgalys &
Hester 1990); and parts of the TEF-1α gene region; the BT
gene region; the HIS3 gene region with the same primer sets mentioned
previously, the actin (ACT) gene region using primers ACT-512F and ACT-783R
(Carbone & Kohn 1999) and
CAL gene region using primers CAL-228F and CAL-737R
(Carbone & Kohn 1999).The PCR reaction mixture used to amplify the different loci consisted of
2.5 units FastStart Taq polymerase (Roche Applied Science, USA),
1× PCR buffer, 1–1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 μm of
each primer and approximately 30 ng of fungal genomic DNA, made up to a total
reaction volume of 25 μL with sterile deionised water. Amplified fragments
were purified using High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche,
U.S.A.).
DNA sequencing and analysis
Amplified fragments were sequenced in both directions using the same primer
pairs used for amplification. For this purpose, the BigDye terminator
sequencing kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, U.S.A.) and an ABI PRISM™
3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) were used. All PCRs and sequencing
reactions were performed on an Eppendorf Mastercycler Personal PCR (Eppendorf
AG, Germany) with cycling conditions as described in Crous et al.
(2006) for all loci
amplified.In addition to the sequences generated in this study, Calonectriaspp. sequences were obtained from GenBank. All sequences were assembled and
aligned using Sequence Navigator v. 1.0.1 (Applied Biosystems) and MAFFT v.
5.11 (Katoh ), respectively. The aligned sequences were then manually
corrected where necessary. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) were
determined for the aligned DNA sequences of each gene region using DnaSP v.
5.00.06 (Librado & Rozas
2009)To determine whether the DNA sequence data sets were congruent, a partition
homogeneity test (PHT; Farris ) of all possible combinations, with 1 000
replications on all informative characters was conducted in PAUP (Phylogenetic
Analysis Using Parsimony, v. 4.0b10;
Swofford 2002). A 70 %
reciprocal bootstrap method using Neighbour-Joining with Maximum Likelihood
distance (Mason-Gamer & Kellogg
1996; Gueidan ) was also employed. Models of evolution were estimated in
Modeltest v. 3.7 (Posada & Crandall
1998) using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for each gene
region. The bootstrap analyses were run in PAUP for 10 000 replicates.
Resulting tree topologies were compared visually for conflict between the
separate gene regions.Maximum-parsimony genealogies, for single genes and the combined genes were
estimated in PAUP, by heuristic searches based on 1 000 random addition
sequences and tree bisection-reconnection, with the branch swapping option set
on “best trees” only. All characters were weighted equally and
alignment gaps were treated as missing data. Statistics calculated for
parsimony included tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index
(RI) and rescaled consistence index (RC). Bootstrap analysis
(Hillis & Bull 1993) was
based on 1 000 replications. All sequences for the isolates studied were
analysed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for Nucleotide sequences
(BLASTN, Altschul ).A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was used to generate
phylogenetic trees for each gene region and combined sequence data subsets
with Bayesian probabilities using MrBayes v. 3.1.1
(Ronquist & Huelsenbeck
2003). Models of nucleotide substitution for each gene were
determined using MrModeltest (Nylander
2004) and included for each gene partition. Four MCMC chains were
run simultaneously from random trees for one million generations, sampled
every 100 generations and repeated twice. Both runs converged on the same
likelihood score and tree topology for each gene. The first 1 000 trees were,
therefore, discarded as the burn-in phase of each analysis and posterior
probabilities were determined from the remaining trees.
Sexual compatibility
Based on the results of the DNA sequence analyses, single conidial isolates
of Calonectriaspp. of unknown identity were crossed with closely
related species in all possible combinations. Where available, mating tester
strains defined in previous studies were also used. Crosses were made as
described in Schoch et al.
(1999) on carnation leaf agar
(CLA; Fisher , Crous ) and minimal salt agar (MSA; Guerber & Correll 2001,
Halleen )
with sterile toothpicks placed on the surface of the agar
(Lombard ). Controls consisted of isolates self-crossed, making it
possible to distinguish between those having heterothallic or homothallic
mating systems. Isolates
CBS
125273–125276 from Indonesia were mated with Ca.
macroconidialis (CBS
114880). Colombian isolates
CBS 123698 and CMW
31210 and Indonesian isolates
CBS
125258–125260 were crossed with Ca. brachiatica
(CBS 123700 and CMW
25302) and Ca. brassicae
(CBS 111478 and
CBS 111869) in all
possible combinations. Isolates
CBS 125248,
CBS 125253,
CBS 125277 and CMW
14883 were crossed with Ca. cerciana
(CBS 123693 and
CBS 123695),
Ca. brasiliensis (CBS
230.51 and CBS
114257) and mating tester strains of Ca. insularis
(CBS 114558 and
CBS 114559;
Schoch ).
Similarly, isolates CBS
125249–125252,
CBS 125261 and
CBS 125269 were
crossed with mating tester strains of Ca. spathiphylli
(CBS 114540 and
CBS 116168;
Crous 2002). Isolates
CBS
125254–125257 were crossed with mating tester strains of
Ca. scoparia (CMW 31000 and CMW 31001;
Lombard )
and Ca. pauciramosa (CMW 5683 and CMW 30823;
Schoch ).
The plates were stacked in plastic containers and incubated at 22 °C for
6–8 wk. Crosses were regarded as successful when isolate combinations
produced numerous perithecia extruding viable ascospores.
Taxonomy
For identification of Calonectria isolates based on morphology,
single conidial cultures were prepared on MEA and synthetic nutrient-poor agar
(SNA; Nirenburg 1981, Lombard
et al. 2009,
2010a,
c). Inoculated plates were
incubated at room temperature and examined after 7 d. Gross morphological
characteristics of the anamorph structures were determined by mounting fungal
structures in lactic acid and 30 measurements at ×1 000 magnification
were made for all taxonomically informative characters for each isolate.
Teleomorph morphology was determined by mounting perithecia resulting from the
sexual compatibility tests in Leica mountant (Setpoint Premier, Johannesburg,
South Africa) and making sections using a Leica CM1100 cryostat (Setpoint
Technologies) at -20 °C. The 10 μm sections were mounted in lactophenol
or 3 % KOH. Gross morphological characteristics were determined in the same
manner as for the anamorph states. The 95 % confidence levels were determined
and extremes of conidial measurements are given in parentheses. For other
structures, only extremes are presented in the descriptions. Optimal growth
conditions for cultures were determined in the dark on MEA for each isolate,
at temperatures ranging from 5–35 °C at 5 °C intervals with
three replicate plates for each temperature tested. Two measurements of
culture diameter perpendicular to each other were made daily for 7 d. Colony
colours were determined after 7 d on MEA at 25 °C in the dark, using the
colour charts of Rayner
(1970). Descriptions,
nomenclature and illustrations were deposited in MycoBank
(Crous ).
RESULTS
Amplicons of approx. 500 bp were generated for the BT and TEF-1α gene
regions and those for the HIS3 region were approx. 450 bp in length. Based on
preliminary BT sequence comparisons and morphological characteristics, the
sequence data sets for the unknown Calonectriaspp. were divided into
four separate data sets representing the Ca. colhounii, Ca. brassicae, Ca.
scoparia and Ca. morganii complexes and other closely related
species in each data set. These data sets were analysed separately with
Ca. colombiensis (CBS
112221) and Ca. chinensis
(CBS 112744) as
outgroup taxa. For Bayesian analyses, a HKY+I+G model was selected for BT and
TEF-1α, and GTR+I+G for HIS3 for all four data sets, which was
incorporated in the analyses. The consensus trees obtained from the Bayesian
analyses confirmed the tree topologies obtained with maximum-parsimony as well
as bootstrap support. Therefore, only maximum-parsimony trees are presented
with bootstrap values and posterior probabilities shown for well-supported
branches.The most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1 000
random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α sequence
alignments of the Ca. colhounii complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.The partition homogeneity tests for all possible combinations of the three
gene regions used, consistently yielded a P-value of 0.001 for the four
separate data sets. The 70 % reciprocal bootstrap trees showed no conflict in
tree topologies for the three gene regions in each of the four separate data
sets. Based on the tree topologies of the 70 % reciprocal bootstrap trees and
a P-value of 0.001 in the PHT (Cunningham
1997, Dettman ) the DNA sequences for the three gene regions were combined
for each of the four separate data sets.The combined sequence data set representing the Ca. colhounii
complex, with 10 taxa including outgroups, consisted of 1 497 characters,
including gaps. Of these characters, 1 051 were constant, 133 were
parsimony-uninformative and 313 characters were parsimony informative.
Parsimony analysis of the aligned sequences yielded one most parsimonious tree
(Fig. 1; TL = 649 steps; CI =
0.888; RI = 0.891; RC = 0.791). In the tree, isolates
CBS
125273–125276, from Indonesia, grouped close to but separate
from Ca. colhounii
(CBS 293.79 and
CBS 114704) with
100 % bootstrap support (BP) and a posterior probability (PP) of 0.97. The SNP
analyses showed 16 unique alleles for the Indonesian isolates with one shared
unique allele with Ca. madagascariensis
(CBS 114571 and
CBS 114572) and two
shared alleles with Ca. macroconidialis
(CBS 114880) for
the three gene regions analysed (Table
2). These unique alleles, however, distinguish the Indonesian
isolates from Ca. colhounii, Ca. macroconidialis and Ca.
madagascariensis.
Fig. 1.
The most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1 000
random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α sequence
alignments of the Ca. colhounii complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.
Table 2.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms comparisons between Ca. eucalypti
and Ca. colhounii, compared to Ca. macroconidialis and
Ca. madagascariensis.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms comparisons between Ca. eucalypti
and Ca. colhounii, compared to Ca. macroconidialis and
Ca. madagascariensis.The data set representing the Ca. brassicae complex consisted of
15 taxa including the outgroups, while the combined sequence alignment was
made up of 1 509 characters, including gaps. These characters represented 1
092 constant, 127 parsimony-uninformative and 290 parsimony-informative
characters. Parsimony analysis yielded one most parsimonious tree
(Fig. 2; TL = 569 steps; CI =
0.931; RI = 0.918; RC = 0.855). In the tree, Colombian isolates
CBS 123698 and
CBS 125523
clustered close to Ca. brassicae
(CBS 111869 and
CBS 111478) and
Ca. brachiatica (CBS
123700 and CMW 25302) but separately from both these species with
high support (BP = 100 and PP = 1.00). Similarly, isolates
CBS
125258–125260, from Indonesia, clustered together closely
related to Ca. brassicae and Ca. brachiatica. These
Indonesian isolates were also closely related to the Colombian isolates but
grouped separately from them in a clade with high support (BP = 97 and PP =
1.00). The SNP analyses showed that isolates
CBS 123698 and
CBS 125523 have 18
unique alleles and isolates
CBS
125258–125260 have four unique alleles distinguishing them
from each other for the three gene regions analysed. These isolates also share
14 unique alleles, distinguishing them from Ca. brassicae and Ca.
brachiatica (Table 3).
Fig. 2.
The most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1 000
random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α sequence
alignments of the Ca. brassicae complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.
Table 3.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms from the sequence datasets for Ca.
pini and Ca. orientalis compared to Ca. brachiatica and
Ca. brassicae.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms from the sequence datasets for Ca.
pini and Ca. orientalis compared to Ca. brachiatica and
Ca. brassicae.The third data set, represented by 16 ingroup taxa residing in the Ca.
scoparia complex and closely related species, consisted of 1 530
characters including gaps for the three gene regions analysed. Of these
characters, 1 114 were constant, 138 were parsimony-uninformative and 278
characters were parsimony informative. Parsimony analysis of the aligned
sequences yielded two most parsimonious trees (TL = 551 steps; CI = 0.902; RI
= 0.925; RC = 0.834), one of which is presented in
Fig. 3. In the tree, isolates
CBS
125254–125257 from Ecuador, clustered closely but separately
from Ca. scoparia (CMW 31000 and CMW 31001) and other species in the
Ca. pauciramosa complex with low support (BP = 63 and PP = 1.00). The
Ecuadorian isolates also had three unique alleles separating them from Ca.
scoparia and Ca. pauciramosa (CMW 5683 and CMW 30823) for the BT
and TEF-1α regions, but there were no unique alleles for these isolates
in the HIS3 region (Table
4).
Fig. 3.
One of two most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1
000 random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α
sequence alignments of the Ca. scoparia complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.
Table 4.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms comparisons between Ca. scoparia
and Ca. pseudoscoparia, compared to Ca. pauciramosa.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms comparisons between Ca. scoparia
and Ca. pseudoscoparia, compared to Ca. pauciramosa.The most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1 000
random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α sequence
alignments of the Ca. brassicae complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.The aligned sequence data set for the Ca. morganii complex
included 25 ingroup taxa consisting of 1 535 characters. Of these characters,
975 were constant, 211 were parsimony-uninformative and 349 characters were
parsimony-informative. Parsimony analysis of the aligned sequences yielded
three most parsimonious trees (TL = 977 steps; CI = 0.784; RI = 0.825; RC =
0.647), one of which is presented in Fig.
4. In the tree, isolates
CBS
125249–125252,
CBS 125261 and
CBS 125269 from
Ecuador clustered in a clade (BP = 99 and PP = 1.00) with Ca.
spathiphylli (CBS
114540 and CBS
116168) and Ca. pseudospathiphylli
(CBS 109165),
whereas isolates CBS
125248, CBS
125253, CBS
125277 and CMW 14883 from Indonesia clustered close to Ca.
brasiliensis (CBS
230.51 and CBS
114257) but with low support (BP = 52; PP = 0.90) in a separate,
well-supported clade (BP = 100; PP = 1.00). Isolates
CBS 125249,
CBS 125250 and
CBS 125261
clustered together in a well-supported clade (BP = 93; PP = 1.00) separate
from CBS 125251,
CBS 125252 and
CBS 125269, that
also clustered together in a well-supported clade (BP = 81; PP = 1.00). Both
clades were separate from Ca. spathiphylli and Ca.
pseudospathiphylli but closely related to these species. The SNP analyses
showed that isolates CBS
125249, CBS
125250 and CBS
125261 shared four unique alleles and
CBS 125251,
CBS 125252 and
CBS 125269 shared
seven unique alleles for the three gene regions. These isolates also shared an
additional 33 alleles, distinguishing them from Ca. spathiphylli
(Table 5). Isolates
CBS 125248,
CBS 125253,
CBS 125277 and CMW
14883 shared eight unique alleles, distinguishing them from Ca.
brasiliensis (CBS
230.51 and CBS
114257), Ca. cerciana
(CBS 123693 and
CBS 123695) and
Ca. insularis (CBS
114558 and CBS
114559) (Table
6).
Fig. 4.
One of three most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with
1 000 random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α
sequence alignments of the Ca. morganii complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.
Table 5.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms from the sequence datasets for Ca.
densa and Ca. humicola compared to Ca.
spathiphylli.
Table 6.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms comparisons between Ca. brasiliensis,
Ca. insularis and Ca. sulawesiensis compared to Ca.
cerciana.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms from the sequence datasets for Ca.
densa and Ca. humicola compared to Ca.
spathiphylli.Single nucleotide polymorphisms comparisons between Ca. brasiliensis,
Ca. insularis and Ca. sulawesiensis compared to Ca.
cerciana.One of two most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1
000 random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α
sequence alignments of the Ca. scoparia complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.Approximately 250 bases were determined for ACT, 450 bases for HIS3, 500
for BT, CAL and TEF-1α, 700 for ITS and 880 for LSU. The adjusted
sequence alignments for each gene region consisted of 122 ingroup taxa with
Cylindrocladiella lageniformis
(CBS 112898) and
C. peruviana (CPC 5614) as outgroup taxa for each gene region. For
Bayesian analyses, a K80+G model was selected for ACT, HKY+I+G for BT, CAL and
TEF-1α, GTR+I+G for HIS3 and LSU, and SYM+I+G for ITS and incorporated
in the analyses. The consensus trees obtained from the Bayesian analyses
confirmed the tree topologies obtained with maximum-parsimony as well as
bootstrap support.Individual analyses of the gene regions showed similar tree topologies for
the protein coding regions (ACT, BT, CAL, HIS3 and TEF-1α) with
well-supported clades for Calonectriaspp. with similar morphological
characteristics. In contrast, the non-coding gene regions (ITS and LSU)
provided little or no support for the clades that emerged from the protein
coding regions, with several Calonectriaspp. clustering together
with no significant similarities. The trees for the ITS and LSU regions showed
a single monophyletic clade for all Calonectriaspp. and did not
reveal the two clades observed for the coding gene regions. The phylogeny
constructed based on CAL sequences showed the best resolution of the species
and it had the highest support for the individual clades, followed by
TEF-1α gene region. Statistical data for the individual trees (not
shown) are presented in Table
7.
Table 7.
Statistical information on the sequence dataset and maximum parsimony trees
for each locus.
Actin
β-tubulin
Calmodulin
Histone H3
ITS
LSU
TEF-1α
Aligned characters
290
532
531
499
706
887
596
Variable characters
15
42
39
62
32
10
57
Informative characters
151
268
323
223
112
37
337
Most parsimonious trees
2622
91
1000
372
1000
100
9970
Tree length
573
1454
1282
1843
296
91
1641
CI
0.490
0.431
0.467
0.352
0.618
0.538
0.477
RI
0.867
0.840
0.849
0.793
0.882
0.913
0.871
RC
0.425
0.569
0.397
0.648
0.545
0.492
0.416
Statistical information on the sequence dataset and maximum parsimony trees
for each locus.The partition homogeneity tests for all possible combinations of the seven
gene regions used, consistently yielded a P-value of 0.001. The 70 %
reciprocal bootstrap trees showed no conflict in tree topologies for the five
coding gene regions (ACT, BT, CAL, HIS3 and TEF-1α), however conflicts
were observed between the non-coding gene regions (ITS and LSU) and the coding
gene regions. Based on the tree topologies and a P-value of 0.001
(Cunningham 1997,
Dettman )
the sequence data for coding gene regions were combined. The data for the ITS
and LSU datasets were treated separately, but these are not presented because
they add little taxonomic value. However, all ITS and LSU sequences generated
in this study have been deposited in GenBank and TreeBase
(Table 1).One of three most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with
1 000 random additions sequences of the combined BT, HIS3 and TEF-1α
sequence alignments of the Ca. morganii complex. Scale bar shows 10
changes and bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian
posterior probability values are indicated at the nodes. Red lines indicate
bootstrap values of 100 and posterior probabilities of 1.00. Thickened lines
indicate branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the
Bayesian analyses.The combined sequence alignment of the five coding gene regions consisted
of 2 472 characters, including gaps. Of these characters, 925 were constant,
267 were parsimony-uninformative and 1 280 characters were
parsimony-informative. Parsimony analysis of the aligned sequences yielded 24
most parsimonious trees (TL = 7319 steps; CI = 0.397; RI = 0.820; RC = 0.326),
one of which is presented in Fig.
5. The tree topology obtained with the combined sequence dataset
was similar to that obtained for the individual gene regions analysed and
therefore the only tree presented is that of the combined dataset.
Fig. 5.
One of 24 most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1
000 random additions sequences of the combined actin, β-tubulin,
calmodulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor 1-alpha sequence
alignments of the Calonectria. Scale bar shows 10 changes and
bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian posterior
probability values are indicated at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate
branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the Bayesian
analyses. Red lines indicate bootstrap values of 100 and posterior
probabilities of 1.00. The tree was rooted to Cylindrocladiella
lageniformis (CBS
112898) and C. peruviana (CPC 5614). Phylogenetic groups
are indicated on the right.
One of 24 most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic search with 1
000 random additions sequences of the combined actin, β-tubulin,
calmodulin, histone H3 and translation elongation factor 1-alpha sequence
alignments of the Calonectria. Scale bar shows 10 changes and
bootstrap support values (bold) from 1 000 replicates and Bayesian posterior
probability values are indicated at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate
branches in the strict consensus tree and the consensus tree of the Bayesian
analyses. Red lines indicate bootstrap values of 100 and posterior
probabilities of 1.00. The tree was rooted to Cylindrocladiella
lageniformis (CBS
112898) and C. peruviana (CPC 5614). Phylogenetic groups
are indicated on the right.In the tree (Fig. 5), the
Calonectriaspp. were found to clearly reside in two main clades
which was consistent for the analyses for these gene regions separately. One
of these clades (BP = 82, PP = 0.62) which we refer to as representing the
Prolate Group, includes Calonectriaspp. with clavate to pyriform to
ellipsoidal vesicles. This clade (Fig.
5) is made up of two sub-clades, one (BP = 81, PP = 1.00) of which
includes 10 minor clades representing Calonectriaspp. that have
vesicles and conidia that have similar morphology. The second sub-clade (BP =
99, PP = 1.00) representing the Prolate Group includes taxa represented by
single isolates and for which there were no obvious unifying morphological
characters.The second main clade (BP = 65, PP = 0.64) which is referred to as the
Sphaero-Naviculate Group of species included Calonectriaspp.
characterised by sphaeropedunculate and naviculate vesicles and these were
also seen in the analyses based on the individual gene regions. This clade is
further sub-divided into two clades. The first of these sub-clades (BP = 65,
PP = 1.00) includes Calonectriaspp. characterised by
sphaeropedunculate vesicles. The second sub-clade (BP = 93, PP = 0.86)
accommodates Calonectriaspp. with naviculate vesicles.The only isolates in the mating tests that yielded perithecia were
CBS
125273–125276 (Fig.
6). These isolates all produced perithecia containing viable
ascospores within 6 wk when mated with themselves, indicating that they are
self-fertile (homothallic). All other control inoculations with the selected
isolates failed to yield perithecia, indicating that they were either
self-sterile (heterothallic) and non-compatible, or that they had lost the
ability to undergo sexual recombination.
Fig 6.
Results of sexual compatibility tests. Successful matings are indicated by
(+) and unsuccessful matings is indicated with (-). Blue highlighted blocks
indicate homothallic matings. Yellow blocks highlight unsuccessful self-self
matings. Purple blocks indicate mating tester strain matings. A. Matings
between isolates of Ca. macroconidialis and Ca. eucalypti.
B. Matings between isolates of Ca. brachiatica, Ca.
brassicae, Ca. pini and Ca. orientalis. C. Matings
between isolates of Ca. brasiliensis, Ca. cerciana, Ca.
insularis and Ca. sulawesiensis. D. Matings between isolates of
Ca. densa, Ca. humicola and Ca. spathiphylli. E.
Matings between isolates of Ca. pauciramosa, Ca.
pseudoscoparia and Ca. scoparia.
Based on morphological observations, phylogenetic inference and mating,
numerous isolates of Calonectriaspp. included in this study
represent undescribed species. Species of Cylindrocladium (1892)
represent anamorph states of Calonectria (1867)
(Rossman ). In an attempt to move to a single nomenclature for
pleomorphic fungi, the teleomorph name takes precedence over the anamorph name
when both types belong to the same holomorph. The species below are described
as new species in Calonectria, which represents the older generic
name for these holomorphs and follows Lombard et al.
(2009,
2010a,
c). All
Cylindrocladium species without a Calonectria state, are
also transferred to Calonectria.Results of sexual compatibility tests. Successful matings are indicated by
(+) and unsuccessful matings is indicated with (-). Blue highlighted blocks
indicate homothallic matings. Yellow blocks highlight unsuccessful self-self
matings. Purple blocks indicate mating tester strain matings. A. Matings
between isolates of Ca. macroconidialis and Ca. eucalypti.
B. Matings between isolates of Ca. brachiatica, Ca.
brassicae, Ca. pini and Ca. orientalis. C. Matings
between isolates of Ca. brasiliensis, Ca. cerciana, Ca.
insularis and Ca. sulawesiensis. D. Matings between isolates of
Ca. densa, Ca. humicola and Ca. spathiphylli. E.
Matings between isolates of Ca. pauciramosa, Ca.
pseudoscoparia and Ca. scoparia.L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515529,
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Calonectria densa. A–D. Macroconidiophores. E–I.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform
phialides. J–L. Ovoid to ellipsoid vesicles. M–N. One-septate
macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to the fact that lateral stipe extensions
are readily formed in this species, giving it a bushy appearance.Teleomorpha ignota. Anamorpha Cy. spathiphylli similis sed
extensiones laterales stiparum facit, macroconidiis cylindricis utrinque
rotundatis rectis (47–)50–58(–62) × 5–6 μm
mediocriter 54 × 6 μm, semel septatis, sine cicatrice abscissionis
manifesta, cum muco hyalino in fasciculis parallelis cylindricis differ.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing
penicillate suites of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 54–90 × 6–10
μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 149–192 μm
long, 5–6 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in ovoid to
ellipsoid to sphaeropedunculate vesicles, 10–12 μm diam; lateral
stipe extensions (90° to the axis) also present. Conidiogenous
apparatus 49–78 μm long, and 63–123 μm wide; primary
branches aseptate, 20–29 × 5–6 μm; secondary branches
aseptate, 16–20 × 4–6 μm; tertiary and additional
branches (–4) aseptate, 9–16 × 3–5 μm, each
terminal branch producing 2–4 phialides; phialides doliiform to
reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 11–16 × 2–4 μm; apex with
minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(47–)50–58(–62) × (5–)6 μm (av. = 54 ×
6 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Mega- and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Ecuador, Pichincha Province, Las
Golondrinas, from soil, Dec. 2004, M.J. Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60302,
holotype of Ca. densa, culture ex-type CMW 31182 =
CBS 125261;
Pichincha Province, Las Golondrinas, from soil, Dec. 2004, M.J. Wingfield,
cultures CMW 31184 = CBS
125249; Las Golondrinas, from soil, Dec. 2004, M.J. Wingfield,
culture CMW 31185 = CBS
125250.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 15–35 °C) on MEA, reverse umber
to verona-brown after 7 d; moderate white aerial mycelium with moderate
sporulation; chlamydospores extensive throughout the medium forming
microsclerotia.Calonectria densa. A–D. Macroconidiophores. E–I.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniformphialides. J–L. Ovoid to ellipsoid vesicles. M–N. One-septate
macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.Substrate: Soil.Distribution: Ecuador.Notes: Morphologically, Ca. densa is very similar to
Ca. spathiphylli and Ca. pseudospathiphylli. However,
macroconidia of Ca. densa (av. 54 × 6 μm) are smaller than
those of Ca. spathiphylli (av. 70 × 6 μm), but slightly
larger and broader than those of Ca. pseudospathiphylli (av. 52
× 4 μm). Calonectria densa also readily forms lateral stipe
extensions, not reported for the other two species.L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515530,
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Calonectria eucalypti. A. Perithecium. B. Section through ostiolar
region of a perithecium. C. A vertical section through a perithecium, showing
wall layers. D. Ascus. E–G. Ascospores. H–L. Macroconidiophores.
M–P. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform or allantoid phialides. Q–U. Clavate to broadly clavate
vesicles. V–W. Three-septate macroconidia. Scale bars: A = 90 μm,
H–I = 70 μm, Other bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to Eucalyptus from which the
fungus was isolated.Teleomorpha Ca. colhounii similis sed ascocarpo flavo vel
aurantiaco differt. Anamorpha Cy. colhounii similis sed macroconidiis
cylindricis utrinque rotundatis rectis (66–)69–75(–80)
× 5–6 μm mediocriter 72 × 6 μm, ter septatis, sine
cicatrice abscissionis manifesta, cum muco hyalino in fasciculis parallelis
cylindricis, differt.Perithecia solitary or in groups, yellow to orange, becoming brown
with age; in section apex and body yellow to orange, base red-brown,
sub-globose to ovoid, 325–510 μm high, 285–360 μm diam, body
turning dark red, and base dark red-brown (KOH+). Perithecial walls rough
consisting of 2 thick-walled layers: outside layer of textura
globulosa, 45–90 μm wide; becoming more compressed towards inner
layer of textura angularis, 12–18 μm wide; becoming
thin-walled and hyaline towards the centre, outer cells 24–50 ×
10–40 μm; inner cells 6–19 × 3–6 μm: perithecial
base up to 125 μm wide; consisting of dark red, angular cells; merging with
an erumpent stroma, cells of the outer wall layer continuing into the
pseudoparenchymatous cells of the erumpent stroma. Asci 4-spored,
clavate, 92–188 × 10–27 μm, tapering to a long thin
stalk. Ascospores aggregated in the upper third of the ascus,
hyaline, guttulate, fusoid with rounded ends, straight to slightly curved,
(1–)3-septate, not or slightly constricted at the septum,
(25–)30–36(–56) × (3–)5–6(–8) μm
(av. = 33 × 6 μm). Cultures were homothallic. Conidiophores
with a stipe bearing a suit of penicillate, fertile branches, a stipe
extension, and a terminal vesicle; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 45–91
× 7–10 μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous,
110–235 μm long, 5–6 μm wide at the apical septum,
terminating in broadly clavate vesicles, 4–6 μm diam.
Conidiogenous apparatus 52–82 μm long, and 40–95 μm
wide; primary branches aseptate or 1-septate, 21–29 × 5–6
μm; secondary branches aseptate, 14–21 × 3–5 μm;
tertiary branches and additional branches (–5), aseptate, 11–16
× 3–5 μm, each terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides;
phialides doliiform to reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 10–14 ×
3–4 μm; apex with minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous
collarette. Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(66–)69–75(–80) × (5–)6 μm (av. = 72 ×
6 μm), 3-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Megaconidia and
microconidia not seen.Calonectria eucalypti. A. Perithecium. B. Section through ostiolar
region of a perithecium. C. A vertical section through a perithecium, showing
wall layers. D. Ascus. E–G. Ascospores. H–L. Macroconidiophores.
M–P. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform or allantoid phialides. Q–U. Clavate to broadly clavate
vesicles. V–W. Three-septate macroconidia. Scale bars: A = 90 μm,
H–I = 70 μm, Other bars = 10 μm.Specimens examined: Indonesia, Sumatra Utara, Aek Nauli, on
leaf of Eucalyptus grandis, May 2005, M.J. Wingfield, Herb.
PREM 60298, holotype of Ca. eucalypti, culture ex-type CMW
18444 = CBS 125275;
Aek Nauli, on leaf of Eucalyptus grandis, May 2005, M.J.
Wingfield, PREM 60299, culture CMW 14890 =
CBS 125273; Aek
Nauli, on leaf of Eucalyptus grandis, May 2005, M.J.
Wingfield, culture CMW 18443 =
CBS 125274, Aek
Nauli, on leaf of Eucalyptus grandis, May 2005, M.J.
Wingfield, culture CMW 18445 =
CBS 125276.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 15–30 °C) on MEA, reverse colour
tawny-brown after 7 d; abundant white aerial mycelium and sporulation;
chlamydospores abundant throughout the medium, forming microsclerotia.Substrate: Eucalyptus grandis.Distribution: Indonesia.Notes: The perithecia of Ca. eucalypti can be
distinguished from Ca. colhounii and Ca. macroconidialis
based on their yellow to orange colour in KOH. Macroconidia of Ca.
eucalypti (av. 72 × 6 μm) are also larger than those of Ca.
colhounii (av. 55 × 6 μm) and Ca. madagascariensis (av.
55 × 4.5 μm), but smaller than those of Ca. macroconidialis
(av. 90 × 6.5 μm). Mating tests
(Fig. 6) also showed that
Ca. eucalypti is homothallic, a characteristic shared by Ca.
colhounii and Ca. madagascariensis but not with Ca.
macroconidialis, which is heterothallic
(Crous 2002).L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515531,
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
(p. 50) Calonectria humicola. A–F. Macroconidiophores.
G–I. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and somewhat
elongated, doliiform to reniform phialides. J–N. Globose to ovoid to
sphaeropedunculate vesicles. O–P. One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars =
10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to the fact that this fungus was isolated
from soil.Teleomorpha ignota. Anamorpha Cy. spathiphylli similis sed macroconidiis
cylindricis utrinque rotundatis rectis (45–)48–54(–56)
× 4–5 μm mediocriter 51 × 5 μm, semel septatis, sine
cicatrice abscissionis manifesta, cum muco hyalino in fasciculis parallelis
cylindricis differt.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing
penicillate suites of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 44–90 × 6–8 μm;
stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 126–157 μm long,
4–5 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in globose to ovoid to
sphaeropedunculate vesicles, 10–12 μm diam. Conidiogenous
apparatus 43–71 μm long, and 42–49 μm wide; primary
branches aseptate, 20–29 × 4–6 μm; secondary branches
aseptate, 12–19 × 3–5 μm; tertiary branches aseptate,
9–16 × 3–5 μm, each terminal branch producing 2–4
phialides; phialides elongated doliiform to reniform, hyaline, aseptate,
10–15 × 3–4 μm; apex with minute periclinal thickening
and inconspicuous collarette. Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at
both ends, straight, (45–)48–54(–56) × (4–)5
μm (av. = 51 × 5 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission
scar, held in parallel cylindrical clusters by colourless slime.
Mega- and microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Ecuador, Pichincha Province, Las
Golondrinas, from soil, Dec. 2004, M.J. Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60369
holotype of Ca. humicola, culture ex-type CMW 31183 =
CBS 125251; Las
Golondrinas, from soil, Jan. 2006, L. Lombard, culture CMW 31186 =
CBS 125252; Las
Golondrinas, from soil, Jan. 2006, L. Lombard, (Herb. PREM 60368) culture CMW
31187 = CBS
125269.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 15–35 °C) on MEA, reverse umber
to verona-brown after 7 d; moderate white aerial mycelium with moderate
sporulation; chlamydospores extensive throughout the medium, forming
microsclerotia.Substrate: Soil.Distribution: Ecuador.Notes: Calonectria humicola is morphologically very
similar to Ca. densa, Ca. pseudospathiphylli and Ca.
spathiphylli. However, no lateral stipe extensions occur in this species,
whereas these are common in Ca. densa. Macroconidia of Ca.
humicola (av. 51 × 5 μm) are slightly smaller than those of
Ca. densa (av. 54 × 6 μm) and Ca. spathiphylli (av.
70 × 6 μm), but slightly broader than those of Ca.
pseudospathiphylli (av. 52 × 4 μm).L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515532,
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
Calonectria orientalis. A–C. Macroconidiophores. D–K.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform
phialides. L–Q. Clavate vesicles. R–S. One-septate macroconidia.
Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to the East Asian region, where the fungus
was isolated.Teleomorpha ignota. Anamorpha Ca. brachiaticae similis sed ramis
conidiophorae tres vel minus sine extensionibus lateralibus stipae,
macroconidiis cylindricis utrinque rotundatis rectis
(43–)46–50(–53) × 4–5 μm mediocriter 48
× 4 μm, semel septatis, sine cicatrice abscissionis manifesta, cum
muco hyalino in fasciculis parallelis cylindricis differt.(p. 50) Calonectria humicola. A–F. Macroconidiophores.
G–I. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and somewhat
elongated, doliiform to reniform phialides. J–N. Globose to ovoid to
sphaeropedunculate vesicles. O–P. One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars =
10 μm.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing
penicillate suites of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 60–169 × 6–12
μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 90–218 μm
long, 5–10 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in clavate to
broadly clavate vesicles, 5–10 μm diam. Conidiogenous
apparatus 54–174 μm long, and 67–92 μm wide; primary
branches aseptate, 19–30 × 4–7 μm; secondary branches
aseptate, 16–29 × 4–6 μm; tertiary and additional
branches (–5) aseptate, 10–20 × 5–5 μm, each
terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides; phialides doliiform to
reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 10–19 × 2–5 μm; apex with
minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(43–)46–50(–53) × 4(–5) μm (av. = 48 ×
4 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Mega- and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Indonesia, Langam, from soil, June
2005, M.J. Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60303, holotype of Ca.
orientalis, culture ex-type CMW 20291 =
CBS 125260; Teso
East, from soil, June 2005, M.J. Wingfield culture CMW 20273 =
CBS 125259; Teso
East, from soil, June 2005, M.J. Wingfield, culture CMW 20272 =
CBS 125258.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 15–35 °C) on MEA, reverse
sepia-brown after 7 d; abundant white aerial mycelium with moderate to
extensive sporulation; chlamydospores extensive throughout the medium, forming
microsclerotia.Substrate: Soil.Distribution: Indonesia.Notes: Calonectria orientalis is closely related to
Calonectriaspp. in the Ca. brassicae complex, based on
phylogenetic inference and SNP analyses. Morphological comparisons showed that
the macroconidia of Ca. orientalis (av. 48 × 4 μm) are
shorter than those of Ca. brassicae (av. 53 × 4.5 μm),
Ca. clavata (av. 65 × 5 μm) and Ca. gracilis (av.
56 × 4.5 μm) but larger than those of Ca. brachiatica (av.
44 × 5 μm) and Ca. gracilipes (av. 45 × 4.5 μm). As
with Ca. pini, perithecia could not be induced when this species was
mated with Ca. brachiatica and Ca. brassicae, highlighting
the rarity of teleomorph structures for this group of fungi.Calonectria orientalis. A–C. Macroconidiophores. D–K.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniformphialides. L–Q. Clavate vesicles. R–S. One-septate macroconidia.
Scale bars = 10 μm.Calonectria pini. A–E. Macroconidiophores. F–M.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniformphialides. N–R. Clavate vesicles. S–T. One-septate macroconidia.
Scale bars = 10 μm.L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515533,
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Calonectria pini. A–E. Macroconidiophores. F–M.
Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform
phialides. N–R. Clavate vesicles. S–T. One-septate macroconidia.
Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to Pinus, the host from which the
fungus was isolated.Teleomorpha ignota. Anamorpha Ca. brachiaticae similis sed ramis
conidiophorae tres vel minus sine extensionibus lateralibus stipae,
macroconidiis cylindricis utrinque rotundatis rectis
(37–)40–48(–50) × 4–6 μm mediocriter 44
× 5 μm, semel septatis, sine cicatrice abscissionis manifesta, cum
muco hyalino in fasciculis parallelis cylindricis differ.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing
penicillate suites of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 40–99 × 6–7 μm;
stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 121–266 μm long,
5–7 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in clavate vesicles,
4–6 μm diam. Conidiogenous apparatus 49–81 μm long,
and 35–84 μm wide; primary branches aseptate, 20–30 ×
4–6 μm; secondary branches aseptate, 13–22 × 3–5
μm; tertiary branches aseptate, 11–15 × 3–4 μm, each
terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides; phialides doliiform to
reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 10–15 × 3–4 μm; apex with
minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(37–)40–48(–50) × 4–6 μm (av. = 44 × 5
μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in parallel
cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Mega- and
microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Colombia, Valle del Cauca, Buga, from
Pinus patula, Sept. 2007, C.A. Rodas, Herb. PREM 60304,
holotype of Ca. pini, culture ex-type CMW 31209 =
CBS 123698; Buga,
from Pinus patula, Sept. 2007, C.A. Rodas; Buga, from
Pinus patula, Sept. 2007, C.A. Rodas, culture CMW 31210 =
CBS 125523.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 15–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber
to sepia-brown after 7 d; abundant white aerial mycelium with moderate to
extensive sporulation; chlamydospores extensive throughout the medium forming
microsclerotia.Substrate: Pinus patula.Distribution: Colombia.Notes: Calonectria pini is very similar to Ca.
brachiatica, but can be distinguished morphologically by the fact that it
has three or fewer conidiophore branches and no lateral stipe extensions
(Lombard ). Macroconidia of Ca. pini (av. 44 × 5 μm)
are shorter than those of Ca. brassicae (av. 53 × 4.5 μm),
Ca. gracilis (56 × 4.5 μm) and Ca. orientalis (av.
48 × 4 μm). This species also has fewer conidiophore branches than
those mentioned above. Calonectria pini failed to produce perithecia
when crossed with Ca. brachiatica and Ca. brassicae. This
supports the findings of Crous et al.
(2004b) and Lombard et
al. (2009), that
teleomorph structures are rarely observed in members of the Ca.
brassicae complex.L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515534,
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12.
Calonectria pseudoscoparia. A–E. Macroconidiophores.
F–L. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. M–R. Obpyriform to ellipsoidal vesicles. S–T.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name reflects the fact that the species resembles the
anamorph state of Ca. scoparia.Teleomorpha ignota. Anamorpha Ca. scopario similis sed phialidibus
elongato-doliiformibus vel reniformibus hyalinis non septatis 7–11
× 2–4 μm apice minute periclinale incrassatis colliculo
inconspicuo, macroconidiis cylindricis utrinque rotundatis rectis
(41–)45–51(–52) × 3–5 μm mediocriter 48
× 4 μm, semel septatis, sine cicatrice abscissionis manifesta, cum
muco hyalino in fasciculis parallelis cylindricis differ.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing
penicillate suites of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 56–107 × 6–10
μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 124–201 μm
long, 4–6 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in obpyriform to
ellipsoidal vesicles, 6–10 μm diam. Conidiogenous apparatus
34–87 μm long, and 52–74 μm wide; primary branches aseptate,
26–38 × 4–7 μm; secondary branches aseptate, 17–28
× 4–6 μm; tertiary branches and additional branches (–4)
aseptate, 14–19 × 3–4 μm, each terminal branch producing
2–6 phialides; phialides elongate-doliiform to reniform, hyaline,
aseptate, 7–11 × 2–4 μm; apex with minute periclinal
thickening and inconspicuous collarette. Macroconidia cylindrical,
rounded at both ends, straight, (41–)45–51(–52) ×
3–5 μm (av. = 48 × 4 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible
abscission scar, held in parallel cylindrical clusters by colourless slime.
Mega- and microconidia not seen.Specimens examined: Ecuador, Pichincha Province, Las
Golondrinas, Buenos Aires Nursery, from Eucalyptus grandis cutting,
Dec. 2004, M.J. Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60305, holotype of Ca.
pseudoscoparia, culture ex-type CMW 15218 =
CBS 125257; Buenos
Aires Nursery, from Eucalyptus grandis cutting, Dec. 2004, M.J.
Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60306, cultures from different cuttings, CMW 15214 =
CBS 125254, CMW
15215 = CBS 125255,
CMW 15216 = CBS
125256.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 10–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber
to sepia-brown after 7 d; colony margins irregular with sparse to moderate
white aerial mycelium with moderate sporulation; chlamydospores extensive
throughout the medium forming microsclerotia.Substrate: Eucalyptus grandis.Distribution: Ecuador.Notes: Calonectria pseudoscoparia (conidia av. 48 ×
4 μm) can be distinguished from Ca. scoparia (conidia av. 60
× 4.5 μm) based on smaller macroconidia and the fact that it has
elongated-doliiform to reniform phialides unlike those of Ca.
pauciramosa and Ca. scoparia. Mating tests between this fungus
and Ca. scoparia and Ca. pauciramosa failed to produce
perithecia. Control crosses with both Ca. pauciramosa (CMW 5683 and
CMW 30823) and Ca. scoparia tester isolates (CMW 31000 and CMW 31001)
produced perithecia with viable ascospores showing that culture conditions
were appropriate for mating.L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
Crous, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515535,
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13.
Calonectria sulawesiensis. A–E. Macroconidiophores.
F–K. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. L–Q. Clavate to ellipsoidal vesicles. R–S.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Name refers to the Indonesian island of Sulawesi, where
the fungus was collected.Teleomorpha ignota. Anamorpha Ca. morganii similis sed vesiculo
terminali late clavato vel ellipsoideo 5–7 μm diametro, macroconidiis
cylindricis utrinque rotundatis rectis (41–)45–51(–54)
× (3–)4–6 μm mediocriter 48 × 4 μm, semel
septatis, sine cicatrice abscissionis manifesta, cum muco hyalino in
fasciculis parallelis cylindricis differt.Teleomorph unknown. Conidiophores with a stipe bearing
penicillate suites of fertile branches, stipe extensions, and terminal
vesicles; stipe septate, hyaline, smooth, 37–139 × 5–11
μm; stipe extensions septate, straight to flexuous, 113–262 μm
long, 5–7 μm wide at the apical septum, terminating in broadly
clavate to ellipsoidal vesicles, 5–7 μm diam. Conidiogenous
apparatus 41–79 μm long, and 43–81 μm wide; primary
branches aseptate, 17–41 × 3–6 μm; secondary branches
aseptate, 10–27 × 3–6 μm; tertiary branches and
additional branches (–5), aseptate, 9–15 × 3–5 μm,
each terminal branch producing 2–6 phialides; phialides doliiform to
reniform, hyaline, aseptate, 9–15 × 2–5 μm; apex with
minute periclinal thickening and inconspicuous collarette.
Macroconidia cylindrical, rounded at both ends, straight,
(41–)45–51(–54) × (3–)4(–6) μm (av. =
48 × 4 μm), 1-septate, lacking a visible abscission scar, held in
parallel cylindrical clusters by colourless slime. Mega- and
microconidia not seen.Calonectria pseudoscoparia. A–E. Macroconidiophores.
F–L. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. M–R. Obpyriform to ellipsoidal vesicles. S–T.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.Specimens examined: Indonesia, Sulawesi, from leaf of
Eucalyptus sp., July 2003, M.J. Wingfield, Herb. PREM 60300,
holotype of Ca. sulawesiensis, culture ex-type CMW 14878 =
CBS 125277;
Sulawesi, from leaf of Eucalyptus sp., July 2003, M.J. Wingfield,
PREM 60301 culture CMW 14883; from different leaves, culture CMW 14859 =
CBS 125248, CMW
14879 = CBS
125253.Culture characteristics: Colonies fast growing with optimal growth
temperature at 25 °C (growth at 15–30 °C) on MEA, reverse amber
to sepia-brown after 7 d; abundant white aerial mycelium with moderate to
extensive sporulation; chlamydospores extensive throughout the medium, forming
microsclerotia.Calonectria sulawesiensis. A–E. Macroconidiophores.
F–K. Conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to
reniform phialides. L–Q. Clavate to ellipsoidal vesicles. R–S.
One-septate macroconidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.Substrate: Eucalyptus sp.Distribution: Indonesia.Notes: There are a few morphological differences distinguishing
Ca. sulawesiensis from other species in the Ca. morganii
complex. Macroconidia of Ca. sulawesiensis (av. 48 × 4 μm)
are slightly larger than those of Ca. brasiliensis (av. 30 × 4
μm), Ca. cerciana (av. 44 × 5 μm), Ca. insularis
(av. 45 × 4 μm) and Ca. morganii (av. 45 × 4 μm),
but smaller than those of Ca. hawksworthii (av. 56 × 4 μm),
Ca. leucothoës (av. 73 × 5 μm) and Ca.
variabilis (av. 73 × 5 μm). Mating tests where Ca.
sulawesiensis was crossed with Ca. brasiliensis, Ca. cerciana
and Ca. insularis failed to produce perithecia, or produced
perithecia without viable ascospores.(Crous & El-Gholl) L. Lombard,
M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515536.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium angustatum Crous & El-Gholl, Mycoscience 41: 522.
2000.(Crous & K.D. Hyde) L.
Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515537.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium australiense Crous & K.D. Hyde, Stud. Mycol. 55:
221. 2006.(J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. Schoch)
L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515538.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium canadense J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. Schoch, Syst.
Appl. Microbiol. 24: 210. 2001.(Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515539.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium chinense Crous, Stud. Mycol. 50: 420. 2004.(H.S. Fawc. & Klotz) L. Lombard, M.J.
Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515540.
Basionym:
Candelospora citri H.S. Fawc. & Klotz, Mycologia 29: 213.
1937.≡ Cylindrocladium citri (H.S. Fawc. & Klotz) Boedijn
& Reitsma, Reinwardtia 1: 57. 1950.(Boedijn & Reitsma) L. Lombard,
M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515541.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium curvatum Boedijn & Reitsma, Reinwardtia 1: 54.
1950.(Crous & D. Victor) L. Lombard,
M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515542.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium curvisporum Crous & D. Victor, Syst. Appl.
Microbiol. 20: 283. 1997.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.) L.
Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515543.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium ecuadoriae Crous & M.J. Wingf., Stud. Mycol. 55:
222. 2006.(Leahy, T.S. Schub. & El-Gholl)
L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515544.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium gordoniae Leahy, T.S. Schub. & El-Gholl,
Mycotaxon 76: 80. 2000.(Peerally) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515545.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium hawksworthii Peerally, Mycotaxon 40: 375. 1991.(Linder & Whetzel) L. Lombard, M.J.
Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515546.
Basionym:
Cercosporella hurae Linder & Whetzel, Mycologia 29: 656.
1937.≡ Cylindrocladiopsis hurae (Linder & Whetzel) U. Braun,
Mycotaxon 51: 40. 1994.≡ Cylindrocladium hurae (Linder & Whetzel) Crous, In:
Taxonomy and pathology of Cylindrocladium (Calonectria) and allied
genera: 185. 2002.= Cylindrocladium heptaseptatum Sober, Alfieri & Knauss,
Phytopathology 65: 333. 1975.= Cylindrocladiopsis lagerstroemiae J.M. Yen, Mycotaxon 8: 236.
1979.(Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515547.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium indonesiae Crous, Stud. Mycol. 50: 424. 2004.(El-Gholl, Leahy & T.S.
Schub.) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515548.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium leucothoës El-Gholl, Leahy & T.S. Schub.,
Canad. J. Bot. 67: 2530. 1989.= Cylindrocladium perseae T.S. Schub., Leahy & El-Gholl,
Mycotaxon 73: 474. 1999.(Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515549.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium malesianum Crous, Stud. Mycol. 50: 425. 2004.(Crous, Simoneau &
Risède) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515550.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium multiphialidicum Crous, Simoneau & Risède,
Stud. Mycol. 50: 425. 2004.(J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. Schoch)
L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515551.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium pacificum J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. Schoch, Syst.
Appl. Microbiol. 24: 213. 2001.(Tubaki) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515552.
Basionym:
Candelospora penicilloides Tubaki, Nogaoa 2: 58. 1952.≡ Cylindrocladium penicilloides (Tubaki) Tubaki, J. Hattori
Bot. Lab. 20: 154. 1958.(Crous, J.Z. Groenew. &
C.F. Hill) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515554.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium pseudonaviculatum Crous, J.Z. Groenew. & C.F.
Hill, Sydowia 54: 26. 2002.= Cylindrocladium buxicola Henricot, Mycologia 94: 993. 2002.(Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515555.
Basionym:
Cylindrocladium sumatrense Crous, Stud. Mycol. 50: 426. 2004.
DISCUSSION
In this study, a collection of isolates of unknown identity were shown to
represent seven new species of Calonectria. These species, provided
with the names Ca. eucalypti, Ca. orientalis and Ca.
sulawesiensis from Indonesia, Ca. densa, Ca. humicola and
Ca. pseudoscoparia from Ecuador and Ca. pini from Colombia
were recognised based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic
inference. Recognition of a relatively large number of new species, mainly
from soil samples collected in areas not previously intensively sampled,
suggests that many more species of Calonectria remain to be
discovered, particularly from the tropics and Southern Hemisphere.Calonectria eucalypti, isolated from the leaves of Eucalyptus
grandis, adds a new species to the Ca. colhounii complex
(Crous 2002,
Crous ),
which includes Ca. colhounii, Ca. macroconidialis and Ca.
madagascariensis. Members of this complex are characterised by their
unique yellow perithecia (Crous
2002). Although Ca. eucalypti was isolated from lesions
typical of Cylindrocladium leaf blight, its importance as a pathogen is
unknown. Calonectria eucalypti was shown to be homothallic, which is
a characteristic that this species shares with Ca. colhounii and
Ca. madagascariensis.The descriptions of Ca. pini and Ca. orientalis add two
species to the Ca. brassicae complex
(Crous ,
Lombard ).
Calonectria pini was isolated from Pinus patula rooted
cuttings with symptoms similar to those associated with root and collar
infections caused by Ca. brassicae and Ca. brachiatica on
other Pinus spp. (Lombard ). In contrast, Ca. orientalis was isolated
from soils collected in Indonesia and nothing is known regarding its
pathogenicity. Phylogenetic inference and SNP allele analyses showed that
these are closely related sibling species
(Taylor )
with genetic isolation having apparently occurred recently. Crosses between
isolates of Ca. pini and Ca. orientalis as well as those
with themselves and other Calonectriaspp. in the group failed to
produce perithecia. This is consistent with the observations of Crous et
al. (2006) and Lombard
et al. (2009), that
Calonectriaspp. in this complex rarely produce teleomorph structures
in culture. Calonectria sulawesiensis resides in the Ca.
morganii complex, closely related to Ca. brasiliensis and
Ca. insularis. Morphologically, Ca. sulawesiensis can be
distinguished from other species in the complex based only on macroconidial
dimensions. Therefore phylogenetic inference based on DNA sequence data is
necessary to distinguish it from other members of the Ca. morganii
complex. Members of this complex are well-known pathogens of various hosts
worldwide (Crous 2002), but
nothing is known regarding the pathogenicity of Ca.
sulawesiensis.Calonectria pseudoscoparia is a new species in the Ca.
scoparia complex (Schoch ), isolated from E. grandis cuttings
collected in Ecuador that displayed basal rot symptoms. Calonectriaspp. in this group are well known causal agents of cutting rot in commercial
forestry nurseries worldwide (Crous , Crous
2002, Lombard ). However, the pathogenicity of Ca. pseudoscoparia
is only assumed based on the symptoms with which the fungus was
associated.The two newly described species, Ca. densa and Ca.
humicola, isolated from Ecuadorian soils reside in the Ca.
spathiphylli complex as defined by Kang et al.
(2001b). Calonectria
pseudospathiphylli and Ca. spathiphylli, that define this
complex, are not easily distinguished based on morphology and DNA sequence
comparisons are required for their identification. They can, however, be
distinguished based on their mating strategies, with Ca.
pseudospathiphylli being homothallic and Ca. spathiphylli being
heterothallic (Kang , Crous 2002).
The mating strategies of Ca. densa and Ca. humicola could
not be determined in this study. This complex of species appears to originate
from Central and South America (Chase &
Poole 1987, Kang , Crous
2002).DNA sequence data for the ITS, BT and HIS3 have been used more extensively
to explore phylogenetic relationships amongst Calonectriaspp.
(Schoch ,
Kang et al. 2001a,
2001b,
Henricot & Culham 2002,
Crous et al. 2004b,
2006). In this regard, BT is
the gene region that provides the most valuable insights into relationships
between all species of Calonectria (Schoch et al.
2000b,
2001b,
Crous 2002,
Henricot & Culham 2002).
Application of the CAL and TEF-1α partial gene sequences has only
recently been introduced for Calonectriaspp. (Crous et al.
2004b,
2006, Lombard et al.
2009,
2010a,
c) and data for these gene
regions have been available for only a small sub-set of species. The present
study has attempted to address this problem and also introduce the ACT and LSU
gene sequences that have not been employed previously for Calonectriaspp. It has also provided sequence data for all seven gene regions for all
accepted species in the genus.The ITS and LSU sequences provided little valuable information to separate
Calonectriaspp. In contrast, sequence data for the protein-coding
gene regions ACT, BT, CAL, HIS3 and TEF-1α provided good resolution of
Calonectriaspp., confirming the results of previous studies (Schoch
et al. 1999,
2001a,
Crous 2002,
Henricot & Culham 2002,
Crous et al. 2004b,
2006). This study also
introduced sequence data for the ACT gene region, although it had few
informative sites, consistent with the results of previous studies on other
groups of fungi (Helgason , Hunter ). Phylogenetic analyses of the individual coding gene regions
and single nucleotide polymorphisms showed that CAL sequence data provide the
best resolution distinguishing Calonectriaspp. from each other
followed by sequence data for the TEF-1α, HIS3, BT and ACT gene
regions.In addition to identifying the most useful gene regions to accurately
identify species of Calonectria, an important goal of this study was
to re-consider the phylogenetic relationships between all the species in this
genus. Having determined that the ACT, BT, CAL, HIS3 and TEF-1α gene
regions give the best resolution when identifying species of
Calonectria, a phylogenetic tree for the genus was generated. This
showed that the group includes two major clades and that these define
morphologically similar groups of Calonectriaspp. These two major
clades have substantial substructure with all of the 66 species of
Calonectria residing in one of 13 sub-clades. Eleven of these
sub-clades, that include 50 species, represent the Prolate Group of isolates
and two sub-clades that include 16 species representing the Sphaero-Naviculate
Group of isolates.The Prolate group of isolates incorporates the majority of the plant
pathogenic Calonectriaspp. and includes the type species for
Calonectria (Ca. pyrochoa) and Cylindrocladium
(Cy. scoparium). Most of these pathogenic species have been reported
from forestry crops (Peerally
1991, Crous & Wingfield
1994, Crous 2002,
Crous )
but a few have also been found to infect horticultural and agronomic crops
(Boedijn & Reitsma 1950,
Kim ,
Crous 2002,
Polizzi ,
Vitale et al. 2008). None of the subclades in this group could,
however, be correlated with any specific host type.The geographic distribution of the Calonectriaspp. representing
the various sub-clades of the unifying Prolate Group of isolates shows some
correlation in their distribution. Calonectriaspp. in the sub-clade
representing the Ca. reteaudii complex (Sub-clade I) have been
reported only from Australia, China, Indonesia and New Zealand
(Crous 2002,
Gadgil & Dick 2004,
Crous ,
Lombard ). Another sub-clade of isolates that appears to have
geographical structure resides in the Ca. brassicae complex
(Sub-clade IV). Species in this sub-clade, with the exception of Ca.
orientalis, have all been reported from South and Central America
(Crous 2002,
Crous ,
Lombard ).
Isolates in other sub-clades appeared to have broad geographic distribution
and not to occur in any defined part of the world.Species residing in the Sphaero-Naviculate Group had no obvious patterns of
pathogenicity, or distribution. This group consisted of two sub-clades in
which only vesicle morphology was a consistent character. The majority of the
species in the Ca. kyotensis complex (sub-clade XII) have been
isolated from debris and soil (Crous
) but a few such as Ca. kyotensis, Ca.
ilicicola and Ca. pacifica are important pathogens of agronomic
and forestry crops (Crous 2002,
Crous ).
Members of this sub-clade also had a broad distribution with the majority
reported from Asia (Crous ) and they included both heterothallic and homothallic
species (Crous 2002,
Crous ).The second sub-clade in the Sphaero-Naviculate Group of isolates (sub-clade
XIII) included three Calonectriaspp., only two of which have
morphological similarities. Calonectria multiphialidica is
morphologically similar to the Calonectriaspp. in sub-clade XII but
there were no obvious patterns of distribution and pathogenicity for this
group.The intention of this phylogenetic study was to include all
Calonectriaspp. recognised to date. Calonectria curvata and
Ca. hederae were, however, not included because there are no cultures
for them as has previously been mentioned by Crous
(2002). Furthermore, Ca.
rajasthanensis, Cy. avesiculatum var. microsporum, Cy. bambusae, Cy.
couratarii, Cy. crataegi, Cy. intermedium and Cy. musae were not
included due either to the fact that they have not been validly described or
not recognised as true species of Calonectria
(Crous 2002). Based on the
results of this study, 68 Calonectriaspp. are recognised as valid
and cultures are available for 66 of them.The teleomorph state has not been seen for several species of
Calonectria. Nonetheless Cylindrocladiumspp., irrespective
of whether their perithecial states are known or not, have been provided names
in Calonectria. This is consistent with the view that for all newly
described pleomorphic fungal species, the teleomorph name or the oldest
typified name takes precedence over the anamorph or more recent name when both
types belong to the same holomorph taxon
(Hawksworth 2005,
McNeill ).
It has already been established that Calonectriaspp. have only
Cylindrocladium anamorphs
(Rossman ,
Schoch ),
with micro- and megaconidial states that have thus far not been named. The
name Calonectria was typified in 1867
(Rossman 1979) whereas that of
Cylindrocladium was typified in 1892
(Morgan 1892). Therefore
Calonectria has preference above Cylindrocladium and should
henceforth be used for all species irrespective of whether the perithecial
state has been found.
KEYS
Both synoptic and dichotomous keys to species of Calonectria are
presented. In the synoptic key, numbers grouped with each character refer to
the species that are alphabetically arranged below:Ca. acicola P.D. Gadgill & M.A. DickCa. angustata (Crous & El-Gholl) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. asiatica Crous & N.L. Hywel-JonesCa. australiensis (Crous & K.D. Hyde) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& CrousCa. avesiculata T.S. Schub., El-Gholl, Alfieri & Schoult.Ca. brachiatica L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. brassicae (Panwar & Borha) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. brasiliensis (Peerally) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. canadensis (J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. Schoch) L. Lombard,
M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. cerciana L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. chinensis (Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. citri (H.S. Fawc. & Klotz) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. clavata Alfieri, El-Gholl & E.L. BarnardCa. colhounii PeerallyCa. colombiana L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. colombiensis CrousCa. curvata (Boedijn & Reitsma) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. curvispora (Crous & D. Victor) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& CrousCa. densa L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. ecuadoriae (Crous & M.J. Wingf.) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf.
& CrousCa. eucalypti L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. gracilipes Crous & G.R.A. MchauCa. gracilis Crous, M.J. Wingf. & AlfenasCa. gordoniae (Leahy, T.S. Schub. & El-Gholl) L. Lombard, M.J.
Wingf. & CrousCa. hawksworthii (Peerally) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. hederae C. Booth & J.S. MurrayCa. hongkongensis CrousCa. humicola L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. hurae (Linder & Whetzel) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. &
CrousCa. ilicicola Boedijn & ReitsmaCa. indonesiae (Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. indusiata (Seaver) CrousCa. insularis C.L. Schoch & CrousCa. kyotensis Tersh.Ca. leguminum (Rehm) CrousCa. leucothoës (El-Gholl, Leahy & T.S. Schub.) L.
Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. macroconidialis (Crous, M.J. Wingf. & Alfenas) CrousCa. madagascariensis CrousCa. malesiana (Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. mexicana C.L. Schoch & CrousCa. morganii Crous, Alfenas & M.J. Wingf.Ca. multiphialidica (Crous, Simoneau & Risède) L.
Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. multiseptata Crous & M.J. Wingf.Ca. naviculata Crous & M.J. Wingf.Ca. orientalis L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. ovata D. Victor & CrousCa. pacifica (J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. Schoch) L. Lombard, M.J.
Wingf. & CrousCa. pauciramosa C.L. Schoch & CrousCa. penicilliodes (Tubaki) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. pini L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. polizzii L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. pseudonaviculata (Crous, J.Z. Groenew. & C.F. Hill) L.
Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. pseudoreteaudii L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa pseudoscoparia L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. pseudospathiphylli J.C. Kang, Crous & C.L. SchochCa. pteridis Crous, M.J. Wingf. & AlfenasCa. pyrochoa (Desm.) Sacc.Ca. queenslandica L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. reteaudii (Bugn.) C. BoothCa. rumohrae El-Gholl & AlfenasCa. scoparia PeerallyCa. spathiphylli El-Gholl, J.Y. Uchida, Alfenas, T.S. Schub.,
Alfieri & A.R. ChaseCa. spathulata El-Gholl, Kimbr., E.L. Barnard, Alfieri &
Schoult.Ca. sulawesiensis L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. sumatrensis (Crous) L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. terrae-reginae L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & CrousCa. variabilis Crous, B.J.H. Janse, D. Victor, G.F. Marias &
AlfenasCa. zuluensis L. Lombard, M.J. Wingf. & Crous
Authors: J W Taylor; D J Jacobson; S Kroken; T Kasuga; D M Geiser; D S Hibbett; M C Fisher Journal: Fungal Genet Biol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 3.495
Authors: David S Hibbett; Manfred Binder; Joseph F Bischoff; Meredith Blackwell; Paul F Cannon; Ove E Eriksson; Sabine Huhndorf; Timothy James; Paul M Kirk; Robert Lücking; H Thorsten Lumbsch; François Lutzoni; P Brandon Matheny; David J McLaughlin; Martha J Powell; Scott Redhead; Conrad L Schoch; Joseph W Spatafora; Joost A Stalpers; Rytas Vilgalys; M Catherine Aime; André Aptroot; Robert Bauer; Dominik Begerow; Gerald L Benny; Lisa A Castlebury; Pedro W Crous; Yu-Cheng Dai; Walter Gams; David M Geiser; Gareth W Griffith; Cécile Gueidan; David L Hawksworth; Geir Hestmark; Kentaro Hosaka; Richard A Humber; Kevin D Hyde; Joseph E Ironside; Urmas Kõljalg; Cletus P Kurtzman; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Robert Lichtwardt; Joyce Longcore; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Andrew Miller; Jean-Marc Moncalvo; Sharon Mozley-Standridge; Franz Oberwinkler; Erast Parmasto; Valérie Reeb; Jack D Rogers; Claude Roux; Leif Ryvarden; José Paulo Sampaio; Arthur Schüssler; Junta Sugiyama; R Greg Thorn; Leif Tibell; Wendy A Untereiner; Christopher Walker; Zheng Wang; Alex Weir; Michael Weiss; Merlin M White; Katarina Winka; Yi-Jian Yao; Ning Zhang Journal: Mycol Res Date: 2007-03-13
Authors: Francois Halleen; Hans-Josef Schroers; Johannes Z Groenewald; Cecília Rego; Helena Oliveira; Pedro W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Michael J Wingfield; Z Wilhelm De Beer; Bernard Slippers; Brenda D Wingfield; Johannes Z Groenewald; Lorenzo Lombard; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: X W Wang; J Houbraken; J Z Groenewald; M Meijer; B Andersen; K F Nielsen; P W Crous; R A Samson Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; M J Wingfield; J Guarro; R Cheewangkoon; M van der Bank; W J Swart; A M Stchigel; J F Cano-Lira; J Roux; H Madrid; U Damm; A R Wood; L A Shuttleworth; C S Hodges; M Munster; M de Jesús Yáñez-Morales; L Zúñiga-Estrada; E M Cruywagen; G S de Hoog; C Silvera; J Najafzadeh; E M Davison; P J N Davison; M D Barrett; R L Barrett; D S Manamgoda; A M Minnis; N M Kleczewski; S L Flory; L A Castlebury; K Clay; K D Hyde; S N D Maússe-Sitoe; Shuaifei Chen; C Lechat; M Hairaud; L Lesage-Meessen; J Pawłowska; M Wilk; A Sliwińska-Wyrzychowska; M Mętrak; M Wrzosek; D Pavlic-Zupanc; H M Maleme; B Slippers; W P Mac Cormack; D I Archuby; N J Grünwald; M T Tellería; M Dueñas; M P Martín; S Marincowitz; Z W de Beer; C A Perez; J Gené; Y Marin-Felix; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: P W Crous; R G Shivas; W Quaedvlieg; M van der Bank; Y Zhang; B A Summerell; J Guarro; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; A C Alfenas; U Braun; J F Cano-Lira; D García; Y Marin-Felix; P Alvarado; J P Andrade; J Armengol; A Assefa; A den Breeÿen; I Camele; R Cheewangkoon; J T De Souza; T A Duong; F Esteve-Raventós; J Fournier; S Frisullo; J García-Jiménez; A Gardiennet; J Gené; M Hernández-Restrepo; Y Hirooka; D R Hospenthal; A King; C Lechat; L Lombard; S M Mang; P A S Marbach; S Marincowitz; Y Marin-Felix; N J Montaño-Mata; G Moreno; C A Perez; A M Pérez Sierra; J L Robertson; J Roux; E Rubio; R K Schumacher; A M Stchigel; D A Sutton; Y P Tan; E H Thompson; E van der Linde; A K Walker; D M Walker; B L Wickes; P T W Wong; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: Y Marin-Felix; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; Q Chen; S Marincowitz; I Barnes; K Bensch; U Braun; E Camporesi; U Damm; Z W de Beer; A Dissanayake; J Edwards; A Giraldo; M Hernández-Restrepo; K D Hyde; R S Jayawardena; L Lombard; J Luangsa-Ard; A R McTaggart; A Y Rossman; M Sandoval-Denis; M Shen; R G Shivas; Y P Tan; E J van der Linde; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; J Q Zhang; Y Zhang; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: L Lombard; J Houbraken; C Decock; R A Samson; M Meijer; M Réblová; J Z Groenewald; P W Crous Journal: Persoonia Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: P W Crous; M J Wingfield; R Cheewangkoon; A J Carnegie; T I Burgess; B A Summerell; J Edwards; P W J Taylor; J Z Groenewald Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: X W Wang; L Lombard; J Z Groenewald; J Li; S I R Videira; R A Samson; X Z Liu; P W Crous Journal: Persoonia Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: P W Crous; R G Shivas; M J Wingfield; B A Summerell; A Y Rossman; J L Alves; G C Adams; R W Barreto; A Bell; M L Coutinho; S L Flory; G Gates; K R Grice; G E St J Hardy; N M Kleczewski; L Lombard; C M O Longa; G Louis-Seize; F Macedo; D P Mahoney; G Maresi; P M Martin-Sanchez; L Marvanová; A M Minnis; L N Morgado; M E Noordeloos; A J L Phillips; W Quaedvlieg; P G Ryan; C Saiz-Jimenez; K A Seifert; W J Swart; Y P Tan; J B Tanney; P Q Thu; S I R Videira; D M Walker; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 11.051