| Literature DB >> 20798893 |
Tetsuro Ohno1, Erito Mochiki, Hiroyuki Kuwano.
Abstract
In structure, ghrelin resembles motilin. The two peptides are considered to be members of the motilin-ghrelin peptide family. Motilin is considered to be an endocrine regulator of the interdigestive migrating contractions, the fasted motor pattern in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. It has been reported that ghrelin stimulates GI motility. The gastrokinetic capacity of ghrelin has been well documented in the rodent. However, there have been few positive reports of the gastrokinetic capacity of ghrelin in dogs. Some reports with human subjects have shown that an i.v. ghrelin injection accelerated gastric emptying of a meal and improved meal-related symptoms. These results suggest that ghrelin has potential as a prokinetic. However, it seems unlikely that plasma ghrelin would play a physiological role in these digestive physiological events and stimulate gastric emptying, as these outcomes would appear to be in contradiction with the suppression of the endogenous release of ghrelin after eating. The physiological roles of ghrelin need to be clarified.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20798893 PMCID: PMC2925306 DOI: 10.1155/2010/820794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pept ISSN: 1687-9767
Figure 1The typical four phases of IMC in the dog. Phase I: quiescence. Phase II: phase of irregular contractile activity. Phase III: intensive rhythmic contractions. Phase IV: rapid decline of activity before complete quiescence.
Figure 2Examples of the effect of canine ghrelin at 1 and 10 μg kg BW−1 on the myoelectrical activity in a conscious dog, measured at a gastric body (GB), gastric antrum (GA), duodenum (D), jejunum (J-1 and J-2), and colon (C). Ghrelin did not alter the interval and amplitude of phase III (1 μg kg BW−1) (from [28]).
Figure 3Effects of canine ghrelin on gastric emptying in conscious dogs. Saline and canine ghrelin were administered intravenously. Each symbol represents the mean ± S.E.M. every 15 minutes in three dogs. Differences were not significant (P > .05) (from [28]).