BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The gastroprokinetic activities of ghrelin, the natural ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), prompted us to compare the effect of ghrelin with that of synthetic peptide (growth hormone releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6)) and non-peptide (capromorelin) GHS-R agonists both in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: In vivo, the dose dependent effects (1-150 nmol/kg) of ghrelin, GHRP-6, and capromorelin on gastric emptying were measured by the 14C octanoic breath test which was adapted for use in mice. The effect of atropine, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME), or D-Lys3-GHRP-6 (GHS-R antagonist) on the gastroprokinetic effect of capromorelin was also investigated. In vitro, the effect of the GHS-R agonists (1 microM) on electrical field stimulation (EFS) induced responses was studied in fundic strips in the absence and presence of L-NAME. RESULTS: Ghrelin, GHRP-6, and capromorelin accelerated gastric emptying in an equipotent manner, with bell-shaped dose-response relationships. In the presence of atropine or l-NAME, which delayed gastric emptying, capromorelin failed to accelerate gastric emptying. D-Lys3-GHRP-6 also delayed gastric emptying but did not effectively block the action of the GHS-R agonists, but this may be related to interactions with other receptors. EFS of fundic strips caused frequency dependent relaxations that were not modified by the GHS-R agonists. L-NAME turned EFS induced relaxations into cholinergic contractions that were enhanced by ghrelin, GHRP-6, and capromorelin. CONCLUSION: The 14C octanoic breath test is a valuable technique to evaluate drug induced effects on gastric emptying in mice. Peptide and non-peptide GHS-R agonists accelerate gastric emptying of solids in an equipotent manner through activation of GHS receptors, possibly located on local cholinergic enteric nerves.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The gastroprokinetic activities of ghrelin, the natural ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), prompted us to compare the effect of ghrelin with that of synthetic peptide (growth hormone releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6)) and non-peptide (capromorelin) GHS-R agonists both in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: In vivo, the dose dependent effects (1-150 nmol/kg) of ghrelin, GHRP-6, and capromorelin on gastric emptying were measured by the 14Coctanoic breath test which was adapted for use in mice. The effect of atropine, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME), or D-Lys3-GHRP-6 (GHS-R antagonist) on the gastroprokinetic effect of capromorelin was also investigated. In vitro, the effect of the GHS-R agonists (1 microM) on electrical field stimulation (EFS) induced responses was studied in fundic strips in the absence and presence of L-NAME. RESULTS:Ghrelin, GHRP-6, and capromorelin accelerated gastric emptying in an equipotent manner, with bell-shaped dose-response relationships. In the presence of atropine or l-NAME, which delayed gastric emptying, capromorelin failed to accelerate gastric emptying. D-Lys3-GHRP-6 also delayed gastric emptying but did not effectively block the action of the GHS-R agonists, but this may be related to interactions with other receptors. EFS of fundic strips caused frequency dependent relaxations that were not modified by the GHS-R agonists. L-NAME turned EFS induced relaxations into cholinergic contractions that were enhanced by ghrelin, GHRP-6, and capromorelin. CONCLUSION: The 14Coctanoic breath test is a valuable technique to evaluate drug induced effects on gastric emptying in mice. Peptide and non-peptide GHS-R agonists accelerate gastric emptying of solids in an equipotent manner through activation of GHS receptors, possibly located on local cholinergic enteric nerves.
Authors: Inge Depoortere; Benedicte De Winter; Theo Thijs; Joris De Man; Paul Pelckmans; Theo Peeters Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: A D Howard; S D Feighner; D F Cully; J P Arena; P A Liberator; C I Rosenblum; M Hamelin; D L Hreniuk; O C Palyha; J Anderson; P S Paress; C Diaz; M Chou; K K Liu; K K McKee; S S Pong; L Y Chaung; A Elbrecht; M Dashkevicz; R Heavens; M Rigby; D J Sirinathsinghji; D C Dean; D G Melillo; A A Patchett; R Nargund; P R Griffin; J A DeMartino; S K Gupta; J M Schaeffer; R G Smith; L H Van der Ploeg Journal: Science Date: 1996-08-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: B Y De Winter; J G De Man; T C Seerden; I Depoortere; A G Herman; T L Peeters; P A Pelckmans Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: A A Patchett; R P Nargund; J R Tata; M H Chen; K J Barakat; D B Johnston; K Cheng; W W Chan; B Butler; G Hickey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-07-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yasutake Shimizu; Ed C Chang; Anthony D Shafton; Dorota M Ferens; Gareth J Sanger; Jason Witherington; John B Furness Journal: J Physiol Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: L Wang; N P Murphy; A Stengel; M Goebel-Stengel; D H St Pierre; N T Maidment; Y Taché Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: J Tack; I Depoortere; R Bisschops; C Delporte; B Coulie; A Meulemans; J Janssens; T Peeters Journal: Gut Date: 2005-10-10 Impact factor: 23.059