Literature DB >> 20740071

Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

John C Magill1, Marten F Byl, Batya Goldwaser, Maria Papadaki, Roger Kromann, Brent Yates, Joseph R Morency, Leonard B Kaban, Maria J Troulis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a technique of bone lengthening that makes use of the body's natural healing capacity. An osteotomy is created and a rigid distraction device is attached to the bone. After a latency period, the device is activated 2-4 times per day for a total of 1 mm/day of bone lengthening. This technique is used to correct a variety of congenital and acquired deformities of the mandible, midface and long bones. To shorten the treatment period and to eliminate the complications of patient activation of the device, an automated continuous distraction device would be desirable. It has been reported that continuous distraction generates adequate bone with lengthening at a rate of 2 mm/day, thereby reducing the treatment time. METHOD OF APPROACH: The device we describe here uses miniature high-pressure hydraulics, position feedback, and a digital controller to achieve closed-loop control of the distraction process. The implanted actuator can produce up to 40N of distraction force on linear trajectories as well as curved distraction paths. In the paper we detail the spring-powered hydraulic reservoir, controller, and user interface.
RESULTS: Experiments to test the new device design were performed in a porcine cadaver head and in live pigs. In the cadaver head, the device performed an 11-day/11 mm distraction with a root-mean-squared position error of 0.09 mm. The device functioned for periods of several days in each of five live animals, though some component failures occurred, leading to design revisions.
CONCLUSIONS: The test series showed that the novel design of this system provides the capabilities necessary to automate distraction of the mandible. Further developments will focus on making the implanted position sensor more robust and then carrying out clinical trials.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20740071      PMCID: PMC2927226          DOI: 10.1115/1.3071969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Device        ISSN: 1932-6181            Impact factor:   0.582


  18 in total

1.  A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report.

Authors:  P Kessler; J Wiltfang; F W Neukam
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.

Authors:  M J Troulis; J Glowacki; D H Perrott; L B Kaban
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs.

Authors:  J Wiltfang; P Kessler; H A Merten; F W Neukam
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study.

Authors:  A F Ayoub; W Richardson; D Koppel; H Thompson; M Lucas; T Schwarz; L Smith; J Boyd
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Maria J Troulis; Leonard B Kaban
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Range of curvilinear distraction devices required for treatment of mandibular deformities.

Authors:  Lutz Ritter; Krishna Yeshwant; Edward B Seldin; Leonard B Kaban; Jaime Gateno; Erwin Keeve; Ron Kikinis; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.

Authors:  J G McCarthy; J Schreiber; N Karp; C H Thorne; B H Grayson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Distraction osteogenesis in the mandible with a motor-driven plate: a preliminary animal study.

Authors:  R Schmelzeisen; G Neumann; R von der Fecht
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The classic: On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1905.

Authors:  Alessandro Codivilla
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; John C Magill; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.

Authors:  Leonard B Kaban; Edward B Seldin; Ron Kikinis; Krishna Yeshwant; Bonnie L Padwa; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 5.  Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Katayoun Hatefi; Francis Le Roux; Javad Alizargar; Zeinolabedin Behdadipour; Yimesker Yihun; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.