Literature DB >> 11178848

Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs.

J Wiltfang1, P Kessler, H A Merten, F W Neukam.   

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible is an option in the treatment of mandibular hypoplasia. Today, only intermittent distraction devices are available for clinical application. The aim of this study in minipigs was to evaluate continuous bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder. After a seven-day interval, continuous or intermittent distraction of 1.5 mm/day was established for 10 days. Immediately after active distraction, two animals and 20 days later the other four animals were killed and radiographs taken. The mandible was then removed en bloc and the distracted bone examined histologically. Intermittent distraction forces of up to 2500 kPa were necessary to move the cylinders' piston. The pressure needed for continuous distraction was considerably lower (1200-1300 kPa). While the specific histological structure of the varying zones in the distraction gap was similar after continuous and intermittent distraction, bone healing was accelerated after continuous distraction as shown by ultrasonography and scanning electron microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11178848     DOI: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  "DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS" AN EMERGING CONCEPT IN THE CORRECTION OF CRANIOFACIAL DEFORMITIES.

Authors:  B L Sapru
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  John C Magill; Marten F Byl; Batya Goldwaser; Maria Papadaki; Roger Kromann; Brent Yates; Joseph R Morency; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.582

5.  Preliminary experience with motorized distraction for tibial lengthening.

Authors:  Adam S Bright; John E Herzenberg; Dror Paley; Ian Weiner; Rolf D Burghardt
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2014-03-15

6.  Cephalometric studies of the mandible, its masticatory muscles and vasculature of growing Göttingen Minipigs-A comparative anatomical study to refine experimental mandibular surgery.

Authors:  Giuliano Mario Corte; Hana Hünigen; Kenneth C Richardson; Stefan M Niehues; Johanna Plendl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Katayoun Hatefi; Francis Le Roux; Javad Alizargar; Zeinolabedin Behdadipour; Yimesker Yihun; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.