Literature DB >> 24602810

Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Zachary S Peacock1, Brad J Tricomi2, Matthew E Lawler3, William C Faquin4, John C Magill5, Brian A Murphy6, Leonard B Kaban7, Maria J Troulis8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document the bone formation and soft tissue changes in response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis (DO) at rates greater than 1 mm/day in a minipig model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of Yucatan minipigs underwent automated, continuous, curvilinear DO of the right mandible: group A, 1.5 mm/day (n = 5); and group B, 3.0 mm/day (n = 5). Each minipig underwent 12 mm of distraction followed by 24 days of fixation. The distracted and contralateral mandibles were harvested at the end of fixation. The percentage of surface area (PSA) of the regenerate occupied by bone, fibrous tissue, cartilage, and hematoma was determined using computerized histomorphometric analysis. The control groups consisted of DO wounds distracted discontinuously at 1 mm/day and the nonoperated contralateral mandible. The ipsilateral and contralateral digastric muscles were harvested and stained for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), myogenic differentiation-1 (MyoD), and paired Box 7 protein (PAX7).
RESULTS: All 10 minipigs completed the distraction and fixation period. The PSA occupied by bone was similar for groups A (PSA 64.36% ± 5.87%) and B (PSA 63.83% ± 3.37%) and the control group (1 mm/day; PSA 64.89% ± 0.56%) but was less than that on the nonoperated side (PSA 84.67% ± 0.86%). The PSA occupied by cartilage and hematoma in all groups was minimal (<1.1%). The digastric muscles had no abnormal tissue or inflammation, and PAX7, MyoD, and PCNA expression had returned to the baseline levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that bone formation in response to automated, continuous, and curvilinear DO at a rate of 1.5 and 3.0 mm/day is nearly identical to that with discontinuous DO at 1 mm/day. In addition, no deleterious effects were found on the digastric muscles.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24602810      PMCID: PMC4101076          DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  64 in total

1.  Evaluation of a semiburied, fixed-trajectory, curvilinear, distraction device in an animal model.

Authors:  E B Seldin; M J Troulis; L B Kaban
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report.

Authors:  P Kessler; J Wiltfang; F W Neukam
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Range of curvilinear distraction devices required for treatment of mandibular deformities.

Authors:  Lutz Ritter; Krishna Yeshwant; Edward B Seldin; Leonard B Kaban; Jaime Gateno; Erwin Keeve; Ron Kikinis; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  The principles of the Ilizarov method.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst       Date:  1988

5.  Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible.

Authors:  F J Castaño; M J Troulis; J Glowacki; L B Kaban; K E Yates
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The extracellular matrix of muscle--implications for manipulation of the craniofacial musculature.

Authors:  M P Lewis; J R Machell; N P Hunt; A C Sinanan; H L Tippett
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  A murine model of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  S Isefuku; C J Joyner; A H Simpson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  John C Magill; Marten F Byl; Batya Goldwaser; Maria Papadaki; Roger Kromann; Brent Yates; Joseph R Morency; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.582

10.  Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: II. Molecular analysis of transforming growth factor beta-1 and osteocalcin gene expression.

Authors:  B J Mehrara; N M Rowe; D S Steinbrech; M E Dudziak; P B Saadeh; J G McCarthy; G K Gittes; M T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis assisted by cell-based tissue engineering: a systematic review.

Authors:  B C Tee; Z Sun
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  A Novel Alveolar Distractor Incorporating Nickel-Titanium Alloy Springs: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Sarun Chancharoen; Peerapong Santiwong; Dutmanee Seriwatanachai; Anak Khantachawana; Rochaya Chintavalakorn
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Katayoun Hatefi; Francis Le Roux; Javad Alizargar; Zeinolabedin Behdadipour; Yimesker Yihun; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.