Literature DB >> 1727238

Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.

J G McCarthy1, J Schreiber, N Karp, C H Thorne, B H Grayson.   

Abstract

Lengthening of the mandible by gradual distraction was performed on four young patients (average age 78 months). The amount of mandibular bone lengthening ranged from 18 to 24 mm; one patient with Nager's syndrome underwent bilateral mandibular expansion. Following the period of expansion, the patients were maintained in external fixation for an average of 9 weeks to allow ossification. The patients were followed for a minimum of 11 months to a maximum of 20 months with clinical and dental examinations as well as photographic and radiographic documentation. The technique holds promise for early reconstruction of craniofacial skeletal defects without the need for bone grafts, blood transfusion, or intermaxillary fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1727238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  142 in total

1.  [Retrospective view of the development of malocclusion surgery and prospects].

Authors:  E W Steinhäuser
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-11-07

Review 2.  Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells.

Authors:  J J Mao; W V Giannobile; J A Helms; S J Hollister; P H Krebsbach; M T Longaker; S Shi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Dentate transport discs can be used to reconstruct large segmental mandibular defects.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Veera Malavia; Ibrahim Zakhary; Timothy Mulone; Elias D Kontogiorgos; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Study of Distracted Bone in Maxilla: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Rohan Thomas Mathew; Mustafa Khader; Shehzana Fathima; B H Sripathi Rao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-02-08

5.  Mandibular mechanics after osteotomy and distraction appliance placement I: Postoperative mobility of the osteotomy site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Katherine L Rafferty; Mark A Egbert; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 6.  Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical treatment of craniostenosis: a comparison of internal and external craniofacial distractor devices.

Authors:  S Pelo; G Gasparini; A Di Petrillo; G Tamburrini; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; John C Magill; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Force-induced craniosynostosis in the murine sagittal suture.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Samuel T Rhee; Steven A Goldstein; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Mechanoresponsive stem cells acquire neural crest fate in jaw regeneration.

Authors:  Ryan C Ransom; Ava C Carter; Ankit Salhotra; Tripp Leavitt; Owen Marecic; Matthew P Murphy; Michael L Lopez; Yuning Wei; Clement D Marshall; Ethan Z Shen; Ruth Ellen Jones; Amnon Sharir; Ophir D Klein; Charles K F Chan; Derrick C Wan; Howard Y Chang; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.