Literature DB >> 10851667

A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report.

P Kessler1, J Wiltfang, F W Neukam.   

Abstract

Callus-distraction has become an accepted procedure to lengthen hypoplastic mandibles in humans. Extra- and intraoral devices have been applied successfully. Systematic studies have proven the importance of direction, stability, rate and frequency in callus-distraction. In an experimental animal study a newly developed intraoral microhydraulic osteodistractor was tested. Initially the pressures necessary to distract the mandible in mini-pigs were recorded in discontinuous callus-distraction. These results were used to perform continuous bone distraction. Besides testing the new distractor and evaluating the distraction pressures, the aim of the study was to prove that direct bone growth occurred without preceding cartilage formation. Clinical and microscopic results are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10851667     DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Dento-Alveolar distraction osteogenesis using rigid intra-oral tooth borne distraction device.

Authors:  Arvind Nair; J Phani Kumar; V Venkataramana; A Yuvaraj; V Sridhar Reddy; S Kishore Kumar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-26

3.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; John C Magill; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  John C Magill; Marten F Byl; Batya Goldwaser; Maria Papadaki; Roger Kromann; Brent Yates; Joseph R Morency; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.582

7.  Cephalometric studies of the mandible, its masticatory muscles and vasculature of growing Göttingen Minipigs-A comparative anatomical study to refine experimental mandibular surgery.

Authors:  Giuliano Mario Corte; Hana Hünigen; Kenneth C Richardson; Stefan M Niehues; Johanna Plendl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Katayoun Hatefi; Francis Le Roux; Javad Alizargar; Zeinolabedin Behdadipour; Yimesker Yihun; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.