Literature DB >> 20734113

Conformational dependence of 13C shielding and coupling constants for methionine methyl groups.

Glenn L Butterfoss1, Eugene F DeRose, Scott A Gabel, Lalith Perera, Joseph M Krahn, Geoffrey A Mueller, Xunhai Zheng, Robert E London.   

Abstract

Methionine residues fulfill a broad range of roles in protein function related to conformational plasticity, ligand binding, and sensing/mediating the effects of oxidative stress. A high degree of internal mobility, intrinsic detection sensitivity of the methyl group, and low copy number have made methionine labeling a popular approach for NMR investigation of selectively labeled protein macromolecules. However, selective labeling approaches are subject to more limited information content. In order to optimize the information available from such studies, we have performed DFT calculations on model systems to evaluate the conformational dependence of (3)J (CSCC), (3)J (CSCH), and the isotropic shielding, sigma(iso). Results have been compared with experimental data reported in the literature, as well as data obtained on [methyl-(13)C]methionine and on model compounds. These studies indicate that relative to oxygen, the presence of the sulfur atom in the coupling pathway results in a significantly smaller coupling constant, (3)J (CSCC)/(3)J (COCC) approximately 0.7. It is further demonstrated that the (3)J (CSCH) coupling constant depends primarily on the subtended CSCH dihedral angle, and secondarily on the CSCC dihedral angle. Comparison of theoretical shielding calculations with the experimental shift range of the methyl group for methionine residues in proteins supports the conclusion that the intra-residue conformationally-dependent shift perturbation is the dominant determinant of delta(13)Cepsilon. Analysis of calmodulin data based on these calculations indicates that several residues adopt non-standard rotamers characterized by very large approximately 100 degrees chi(3) values. The utility of the delta(13)Cepsilon as a basis for estimating the gauche/trans ratio for chi(3) is evaluated, and physical and technical factors that limit the accuracy of both the NMR and crystallographic analyses are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20734113      PMCID: PMC5598763          DOI: 10.1007/s10858-010-9436-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  83 in total

1.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

2.  Correlation between 2H NMR side-chain order parameters and sequence conservation in globular proteins.

Authors:  Anthony Mittermaier; Alan R Davidson; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Structure of calmodulin refined at 2.2 A resolution.

Authors:  Y S Babu; C E Bugg; W J Cook
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Identification of binding sites for bepridil and trifluoperazine on cardiac troponin C.

Authors:  Q Kleerekoper; W Liu; D Choi; J A Putkey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-04-03       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Magnesium-induced assembly of a complete DNA polymerase catalytic complex.

Authors:  Vinod K Batra; William A Beard; David D Shock; Joseph M Krahn; Lars C Pedersen; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Dynamic characterization of a DNA repair enzyme: NMR studies of [methyl-13C]methionine-labeled DNA polymerase beta.

Authors:  Bidisha Bose-Basu; Eugene F DeRose; Thomas W Kirby; Geoffrey A Mueller; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Robert E London
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  In vitro enzymatic activity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase mutants in the highly conserved YMDD amino acid motif correlates with the infectious potential of the proviral genome.

Authors:  J K Wakefield; S A Jablonski; C D Morrow
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Comparisons of ring-current shifts calculated from the crystal structure of egg white lysozyme of hen with the proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of lysozyme in solution.

Authors:  S J Perkins; R A Dwek
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1980-01-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Resonance assignment of methionine methyl groups and chi 3 angular information from long-range proton-carbon and carbon-carbon J correlation in a calmodulin-peptide complex.

Authors:  A Bax; F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  17 in total

1.  Protein-mediated antagonism between HIV reverse transcriptase ligands nevirapine and MgATP.

Authors:  Xunhai Zheng; Geoffrey A Mueller; Eugene F DeRose; Robert E London
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Function-related conformational dynamics of G protein-coupled receptors revealed by NMR.

Authors:  Takumi Ueda; Yutaka Kofuku; Junya Okude; Shunsuke Imai; Yutaro Shiraishi; Ichio Shimada
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-05-17

3.  13C NMR detects conformational change in the 100-kD membrane transporter ClC-ec1.

Authors:  Sherwin J Abraham; Ricky C Cheng; Thomas A Chew; Chandra M Khantwal; Corey W Liu; Shimei Gong; Robert K Nakamoto; Merritt Maduke
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 4.  GPCR drug discovery: integrating solution NMR data with crystal and cryo-EM structures.

Authors:  Ichio Shimada; Takumi Ueda; Yutaka Kofuku; Matthew T Eddy; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination.

Authors:  Santrupti Nerli; Andrew C McShan; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 9.795

6.  Solution NMR spectroscopy of GPCRs: Residue-specific labeling strategies with a focus on 13C-methyl methionine labeling of the atypical chemokine receptor ACKR3.

Authors:  Andrew B Kleist; Francis Peterson; Robert C Tyler; Martin Gustavsson; Tracy M Handel; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.441

7.  Transitions in DNA polymerase β μs-ms dynamics related to substrate binding and catalysis.

Authors:  Eugene F DeRose; Thomas W Kirby; Geoffrey A Mueller; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Robert E London
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Probing the correlation between ligand efficacy and conformational diversity at the α1A-adrenoreceptor reveals allosteric coupling of its microswitches.

Authors:  Feng-Jie Wu; Lisa M Williams; Alaa Abdul-Ridha; Avanka Gunatilaka; Tasneem M Vaid; Martina Kocan; Alice R Whitehead; Michael D W Griffin; Ross A D Bathgate; Daniel J Scott; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The dynamic process of β(2)-adrenergic receptor activation.

Authors:  Rie Nygaard; Yaozhong Zou; Ron O Dror; Thomas J Mildorf; Daniel H Arlow; Aashish Manglik; Albert C Pan; Corey W Liu; Juan José Fung; Michael P Bokoch; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; David E Shaw; Luciano Mueller; R Scott Prosser; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Efficacy of the β₂-adrenergic receptor is determined by conformational equilibrium in the transmembrane region.

Authors:  Yutaka Kofuku; Takumi Ueda; Junya Okude; Yutaro Shiraishi; Keita Kondo; Masahiro Maeda; Hideki Tsujishita; Ichio Shimada
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.