Literature DB >> 7352983

Comparisons of ring-current shifts calculated from the crystal structure of egg white lysozyme of hen with the proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of lysozyme in solution.

S J Perkins, R A Dwek.   

Abstract

Detailed ring-current calculations with some consideration for protein flexibility are described for egg white lysozyme of hen. These are based on 15 sets of crystal coordinates of lysozyme and over 60 assigned resonances in the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of lysozyme. These analyses evaluate two basic assumptions: that the refined protein crystal structure is similar to the protein structure in solution and that the present ring-current theories in application to the aromatic amino acids offer a good description of the observed shifts in the protein NMR spectrum. The dipolar, Johnson-Bovey, and Haigh-Mallion equations are tested. The conventional ring-current intensity factors for the tyrosine and phenylalanine rings of 0.94 and 1.00 are found to be satisfactory, but those for the tryptophan ring need to be increased. With this, ring-current effects offer good explanations for the chemical shifts of the aliphatic and aromatic protons in lysozyme for which the NMR signals have to date been resolved and assigned. Ring-current effects do not, however, explain directly the shifts of the six tryptophan N-H protons nor those of the alpha protons. Applications of these calculations are described to compare the tetragonal and triclinic forms of native lysozyme, to propose several assignments of 1H NMR signals in the spectrum of lysozyme, and to analyze some of the conformational changes which occur on the binding of Gd(III) and GlcNAc sugars to lysozyme. The uses and limitations of the calculations for protein NMR are briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7352983     DOI: 10.1021/bi00543a001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Conformational dependence of 13C shielding and coupling constants for methionine methyl groups.

Authors:  Glenn L Butterfoss; Eugene F DeRose; Scott A Gabel; Lalith Perera; Joseph M Krahn; Geoffrey A Mueller; Xunhai Zheng; Robert E London
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Conformational plasticity surrounding the active site of NADH oxidase from Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Teresa Miletti; Justin Di Trani; Louis-Charles Levros; Anthony Mittermaier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Automated 1H and 13C chemical shift prediction using the BioMagResBank.

Authors:  D S Wishart; M S Watson; R F Boyko; B D Sykes
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Molecular analysis of sialoside binding to sialoadhesin by NMR and site-directed mutagenesis.

Authors:  P R Crocker; M Vinson; S Kelm; K Drickamer
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction.

Authors:  Beomsoo Han; Yifeng Liu; Simon W Ginzinger; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Calibration of ring-current effects in proteins and nucleic acids.

Authors:  D A Case
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  The binding of monosaccharide inhibitors to hen egg-white lysozyme by proton magnetic resonance at 270 MHz and analysis by ring-current calculations.

Authors:  S J Perkins; L N Johnson; D C Phillips; R A Dwek
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1981-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  The simultaneous binding of lanthanide and N-acetylglucosamine inhibitors to hen egg-white lysozyme in solution by 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  S J Perkins; L N Johnson; D C Phillips; R A Dwek
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1981-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Orientation of sugars bound to the principal C-type carbohydrate-recognition domain of the macrophage mannose receptor.

Authors:  P G Hitchen; N P Mullin; M E Taylor
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.