BACKGROUND: Existing literature on the acquisition of surgical skills suggests that women generally perform worse than men. This literature is limited by looking at an arbitrary number of trials and not adjusting for potential confounders. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of gender on the learning curve for a fundamental laparoscopic task. METHODS: Thirty-two medical students performed the FLS peg transfer task and their scores were plotted to generate a learning curve. Nonlinear regression was used to estimate learning plateau and learning rate. Variables that may affect performance were assessed using a questionnaire. Innate visual-spatial abilities were evaluated using tests for spatial orientation, spatial scanning, and perceptual abilities. Score on first peg transfer attempt, learning plateau, and learning rate were compared for men and women using Student's t test. Innate abilities were correlated to simulator performance using Pearson's coefficient. Multivariate linear regression was used to investigate the effect of gender on early laparoscopic performance after adjusting for factors found significant on univariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Nineteen men and 13 women participated in the study; 30 were right-handed, 12 reported high interest in surgery, and 26 had video game experience. There were no differences between men and women in initial peg transfer score, learning plateau, or learning rate. Initial peg transfer score and learning rate were higher in subjects who reported having a high interest in surgery (P = 0.02, P = 0.03). Initial score also correlated with perceptual ability score (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, only surgical interest remained a significant predictor of score on first peg transfer (P = 0.03) and learning rate (P = 0.02), while gender had no significant relationship to early performance. CONCLUSIONS: Gender did not affect the learning curve for a fundamental laparoscopic task, while interest in surgery and perceptual abilities did influence early performance.
BACKGROUND: Existing literature on the acquisition of surgical skills suggests that women generally perform worse than men. This literature is limited by looking at an arbitrary number of trials and not adjusting for potential confounders. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of gender on the learning curve for a fundamental laparoscopic task. METHODS: Thirty-two medical students performed the FLS peg transfer task and their scores were plotted to generate a learning curve. Nonlinear regression was used to estimate learning plateau and learning rate. Variables that may affect performance were assessed using a questionnaire. Innate visual-spatial abilities were evaluated using tests for spatial orientation, spatial scanning, and perceptual abilities. Score on first peg transfer attempt, learning plateau, and learning rate were compared for men and women using Student's t test. Innate abilities were correlated to simulator performance using Pearson's coefficient. Multivariate linear regression was used to investigate the effect of gender on early laparoscopic performance after adjusting for factors found significant on univariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Nineteen men and 13 women participated in the study; 30 were right-handed, 12 reported high interest in surgery, and 26 had video game experience. There were no differences between men and women in initial peg transfer score, learning plateau, or learning rate. Initial peg transfer score and learning rate were higher in subjects who reported having a high interest in surgery (P = 0.02, P = 0.03). Initial score also correlated with perceptual ability score (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, only surgical interest remained a significant predictor of score on first peg transfer (P = 0.03) and learning rate (P = 0.02), while gender had no significant relationship to early performance. CONCLUSIONS: Gender did not affect the learning curve for a fundamental laparoscopic task, while interest in surgery and perceptual abilities did influence early performance.
Authors: Kyle R Wanzel; Stanley J Hamstra; Dimitri J Anastakis; Edward D Matsumoto; Michael D Cusimano Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-01-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kyle R Wanzel; Stanley J Hamstra; Marco F Caminiti; Dimitri J Anastakis; Ethan D Grober; Richard K Reznick Journal: Surgery Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Madeleine M Keehner; Frank Tendick; Maxwell V Meng; Haroon P Anwar; Mary Hegarty; Marshall L Stoller; Quan-Yang Duh Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M C Vassiliou; G A Ghitulescu; L S Feldman; D Stanbridge; K Leffondré; H H Sigman; G M Fried Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-02-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Matthew T Gettman; George V Kondraske; Olivier Traxer; Ken Ogan; Cheryl Napper; Daniel B Jones; Margaret S Pearle; Jeffrey A Cadeddu Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Matthias Knobe; Malte Holschen; Saskia Catharina Mooij; Richard Martin Sellei; Ralf Münker; Pia Antony; Roman Pfeifer; Wolf Drescher; Hans-Christoph Pape Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Terrell Holloway; Zachary S Lorsch; Michael A Chary; Stanislaw Sobotka; Maximillian M Moore; Anthony B Costa; Rolando F Del Maestro; Joshua Bederson Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Nicholas Gélinas-Phaneuf; Nusrat Choudhury; Ahmed R Al-Habib; Anne Cabral; Etienne Nadeau; Vincent Mora; Valerie Pazos; Patricia Debergue; Robert DiRaddo; Rolando F Del Maestro Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Graziano Serrao; Massimo Tassoni; Alberto M Magenta-Biasina; Antonio Giuseppe Mantero; Antonino Previtera; Michela Crisitna Turci; Elia Mario Biganzoli; Emanuela A M Bertolini Journal: Ultrasound Int Open Date: 2017-12-07