Literature DB >> 18758776

Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

R P Pitto1, S Malak, I A Anderson.   

Abstract

We developed a method to assess the accuracy of an image-free resurfacing hip arthroplasty navigation system in a proximal femur with normal and abnormal anatomy. A phantom lower limb allowed deformation in varus/valgus and ante-retroversion. At specific points during the simulated surgical procedure, information was compared between a digital caliper and the computer navigation system angular measurements. Repeated serial tests were undertaken. In the setting of normal anatomical alignment of the proximal femur, the mean error of the system characterised as the difference between the measured computer navigation and caliper angles was 0.6 degrees in the frontal plane and 3.4 degrees in the lateral plane. In the setting of abnormal anatomical alignment, the mean error was 0.4 degrees in the frontal plane and 2.1 degrees in the lateral plane. This is the first study designed to assess the accuracy of a femoral navigation system for resurfacing hip arthroplasty in normal settings and in the presence of angular deformity. The study demonstrates satisfactory in-vitro accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18758776      PMCID: PMC2899056          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0644-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  T Leenders; D Vandevelde; G Mahieu; R Nuyts
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2002

2.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  M Sparmann; B Wolke; H Czupalla; D Banzer; A Zink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-08

3.  [Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results].

Authors:  T Hess; T Gampe; C Köttgen; B Szawlowski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Jessica L Lee; Michel J Le Duff; Harlan C Amstutz; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Yuji Hishiki; Zhinian Wan; Deanne Newton; Andrew Yun
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

6.  Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement.

Authors:  R P Pitto; A J Graydon; L Bradley; S F Malak; C G Walker; I A Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-05

7.  Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing.

Authors:  Antony J Hodgson; Kevin B Inkpen; Mark Shekhman; Carolyn Anglin; Jerome Tonetti; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov

8.  Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?

Authors:  S Krüger; P Y Zambelli; P-F Leyvraz; B M Jolles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases.

Authors:  A J Shimmin; D Back
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Intra- and extra-articular planes of reference for use in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jerome Hausselle; Pierre Etienne Moreau; Loic Wessely; Emmanuel de Thomasson; Ayman Assi; Sebastien Parratte; Jerome Essig; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Fabio Favetti; Filippo Casella; Matteo Papalia; Gabriele Panegrossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Use of patient-specific templates in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: experience from sixteen cases.

Authors:  Hao Du; Xiao-xiao Tian; Tong-sen Li; Jin-sheng Yang; Ke-han Li; Guo-xian Pei; Le Xie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Accuracy of computer-assisted navigation for femoral head resurfacing decreases in hips with abnormal anatomy.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Sharif Malak; Iain A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effect of surgical experience on imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing--a preclinical study.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Stephan Kirschner; Albrecht Hartmann; Torsten Schäfer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.175

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.