Literature DB >> 18600323

Ten different hip resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material properties.

Christian Heisel1, Jennifer A Kleinhans, Michael Menge, Jan Philippe Kretzer.   

Abstract

This study gives an overview of the main macro- and microstructural differences of ten commercially available total hip resurfacing implants. The heads and cups of resurfacing hip implants from ten different manufacturers were analysed. The components were measured in a coordinate measuring machine. The microstructure of the heads and cups was inspected by scanning electron microscopy. The mean radial clearance was 84.86 microm (range: 49.47-120.93 microm). The implants were classified into three groups (low, medium and high clearance). All implants showed a deviation of roundness of less than 10 microm. It was shown that all implants differ from each other and a final conclusion about the ideal design and material combination cannot be given based on biomechanical data. Widespread use of specific designs can only be recommended if clinical long-term follow-up studies are performed and analysed for each design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18600323      PMCID: PMC2898991          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0607-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants.

Authors:  F W Chan; J D Bobyn; J B Medley; J J Krygier; M Tanzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design.

Authors:  Duncan Dowson; Cath Hardaker; Magnus Flett; Graham H Isaac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part I: the role of materials.

Authors:  Duncan Dowson; Cath Hardaker; Magnus Flett; Graham H Isaac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.

Authors:  R B C Treacy; C W McBryde; P B Pynsent
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

5.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.

Authors:  R T Steffen; H P Pandit; J Palan; D J Beard; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-04

6.  The contribution of frictional torque to loosening at the cement-bone interface in Tharies hip replacements.

Authors:  M T Mai; T P Schmalzried; F J Dorey; P A Campbell; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty. Evolution and long-term results.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; F Dorey; P F O'Carroll
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael M Morlock; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Principles of tribological analysis of endoprostheses].

Authors:  J P Kretzer; C Zietz; C Schröder; J Reinders; L Middelborg; A Paulus; R Sonntag; R Bader; S Utzschneider
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  The influence of HLA genotype on the development of metal hypersensitivity following joint replacement.

Authors:  David J Langton; Rohan M Bhalekar; Thomas J Joyce; Stephen P Rushton; Benjamin J Wainwright; Matthew E Nargol; Nish Shyam; Benedicte A Lie; Moreica B Pabbruwe; Alan J Stewart; Susan Waller; Shonali Natu; Renne Ren; Rachelle Hornick; Rebecca Darlay; Edwin P Su; Antoni V F Nargol
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-24

6.  Edge loading in metal-on-metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor.

Authors:  Richard J Underwood; Angelos Zografos; Ritchie S Sayles; Alister Hart; Philippa Cann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Dani Gaillard-Campbell; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  The Tribology of Explanted Hip Resurfacings Following Early Fracture of the Femur.

Authors:  James K Lord; David J Langton; Antoni V F Nargol; R M Dominic Meek; Thomas J Joyce
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-10-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.