Literature DB >> 20722728

Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium.

Manus M Patten1, David Haig, Francisco Ubeda.   

Abstract

Extensive fitness variation for sexually antagonistic characters has been detected in nature. However, current population genetic theory suggests that sexual antagonism is unlikely to play a major role in the maintenance of variation. We present a two-locus model of sexual antagonism that is capable of explaining greater fitness variance at equilibrium than previous single-locus models. The second genetic locus provides additional fitness variance in two complementary ways. First, linked loci can maintain gene variants that are lost in single-locus models of evolution, expanding the opportunity for polymorphism. Second, linkage disequilibrium results between any two sexually antagonistic genes, producing an excess of high- and low-fitness haplotypes. Our results uncover a unique contribution of conflicting selection pressures to the maintenance of variation, which simpler models that neglect genetic architecture overlook.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20722728     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01100.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Devon E Pearse; Nicola J Barson; Torfinn Nome; Guangtu Gao; Matthew A Campbell; Alicia Abadía-Cardoso; Eric C Anderson; David E Rundio; Thomas H Williams; Kerry A Naish; Thomas Moen; Sixin Liu; Matthew Kent; Michel Moser; David R Minkley; Eric B Rondeau; Marine S O Brieuc; Simen Rød Sandve; Michael R Miller; Lucydalila Cedillo; Kobi Baruch; Alvaro G Hernandez; Gil Ben-Zvi; Doron Shem-Tov; Omer Barad; Kirill Kuzishchin; John Carlos Garza; Steven T Lindley; Ben F Koop; Gary H Thorgaard; Yniv Palti; Sigbjørn Lien
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Specialists and generalists: the sexual ecology of the genome.

Authors:  David Haig; Francisco Úbeda; Manus M Patten
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Rafael F Guerrero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Thomas C Nelson; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.