Literature DB >> 29036624

Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Katja R Kasimatis1, Thomas C Nelson1, Patrick C Phillips1.   

Abstract

Sexual conflict is a specific class of intergenomic conflict that describes the reciprocal sex-specific fitness costs generated by antagonistic reproductive interactions. The potential for sexual conflict is an inherent property of having a shared genome between the sexes and, therefore, is an extreme form of an environment-dependent fitness effect. In this way, many of the predictions from environment-dependent selection can be used to formulate expected patterns of genome evolution under sexual conflict. However, the pleiotropic and transmission constraints inherent to having alleles move across sex-specific backgrounds from generation to generation further modulate the anticipated signatures of selection. We outline methods for detecting candidate sexual conflict loci both across and within populations. Additionally, we consider the ability of genome scans to identify sexually antagonistic loci by modeling allele frequency changes within males and females due to a single generation of selection. In particular, we highlight the need to integrate genotype, phenotype, and functional information to truly distinguish sexual conflict from other forms of sexual differentiation. © The American Genetic Association 2017. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  genome evolution; interlocus sexual conflict; intersexual genetic covariance; intralocus sexual conflict; linkage disequilibrium; pleiotropy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29036624      PMCID: PMC5892400          DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esx080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  97 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Sexual conflict and protein polymorphism.

Authors:  Ralph Haygood
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accommodation.

Authors:  Yuichiro Suzuki; H Frederik Nijhout
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Rafael F Guerrero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Molecular population genetics of accessory gland protein genes and testis-expressed genes in Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.

Authors:  Bradley J Wagstaff; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Sex-Biased Gene Expression.

Authors:  Sonja Grath; John Parsch
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Are all sex chromosomes created equal?

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Mark Kirkpatrick; Judith E Mank; Stuart F McDaniel; J Chris Pires; William Rice; Nicole Valenzuela
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Coevolution of interacting fertilization proteins.

Authors:  Nathaniel L Clark; Joe Gasper; Masashi Sekino; Stevan A Springer; Charles F Aquadro; Willie J Swanson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The genomic footprint of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayadi; Alvaro Martinez Barrio; Elina Immonen; Jacques Dainat; David Berger; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Björn Nystedt; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual conflict through mother's curse and father's curse.

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Manisha Munasinghe; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Little Evidence of Antagonistic Selection in the Evolutionary Strata of Fungal Mating-Type Chromosomes (Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae).

Authors:  Anna Liza Bazzicalupo; Fantin Carpentier; Sarah Perin Otto; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Phenotypic sexual dimorphism is associated with genomic signatures of resolved sexual conflict.

Authors:  Alison E Wright; Thea F Rogers; Matteo Fumagalli; Christopher R Cooney; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Peter L Ralph; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Sex matters: Otolith shape and genomic variation in deacon rockfish (Sebastes diaconus).

Authors:  Felix Vaux; Leif K Rasmuson; Lisa A Kautzi; Polly S Rankin; Matthew T O Blume; Kelly A Lawrence; Sandra Bohn; Kathleen G O'Malley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Evaluating human autosomal loci for sexually antagonistic viability selection in two large biobanks.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Abin Abraham; Peter L Ralph; Andrew D Kern; John A Capra; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Disagreement in FST estimators: A case study from sex chromosomes.

Authors:  William J Gammerdinger; Melissa A Toups; Beatriz Vicoso
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 7.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.