Literature DB >> 20708836

Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?

Dana E Niles1, Akira Nishisaki, Robert M Sutton, Sara Brunner, Mette Stavland, Shruthi Mahadevaiah, Peter A Meaney, Matthew R Maltese, Robert A Berg, Vinay M Nadkarni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2005, the AHA changed the treatment recommendation for shockable rhythms from 3 transthoracic stacked-shocks to a single shock followed by immediate chest compressions. The stacked-shock recommendation was based on low first-shock efficacy of monophasic waveforms and the theoretical decrease in transthoracic impedance (TTI) following each shock. The objective of this study was to characterize TTI following biphasic defibrillation attempts in children ≥ 8 yrs during cardiac arrest to assess whether a stacked-shock approach may be appropriate to improve defibrillation success.
METHODS: TTI (Ohms (Ω)) was collected via standard anterior-apical defibrillator electrode pads during consecutive in-hospital cardiac arrest biphasic defibrillation attempts in children ≥ 8 yrs. Analytic data points for TTI were: 0.1s pre-shock (baseline); post-shock at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 s. TTI variables analyzed with descriptive summaries/paired t-test. p values < 0.05 considered statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Analysis yielded 13 evaluable shock events during 5 cardiac arrests (mean age 14.3 ± 5 yrs, weight 47.4 ± 7.3 kg) between September 2006 and May 2009. Compared to 0.1s pre-shock baseline values (56.8 ± 23.4 Ω), TTI was significantly lower immediately 0.1s post-shock (55.2 ± 22.2 Ω, p = 0.003). Post-shock mean difference from baseline was 1.6 Ω at 0.1s (p = 0.015), 1.4 Ω at 0.5s (p = 0.019) 1.4 Ω at 1.0 s (p = 0.023), 1.1 Ω at 1.5 s (p = 0.028), and 0.95 Ω at 2.0 s (p = 0.096). Time to recharge our clinical defibrillators to standard biphasic shock dose was 2.80 ± 0.05 s.
CONCLUSIONS: During cardiac arrests in children ≥ 8 yrs, TTI decreased after biphasic shocks, but the limited magnitude and duration of TTI changes suggest that stacked-shocks would not improve defibrillation success.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708836      PMCID: PMC3732212          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  30 in total

1.  Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 6: advanced cardiovascular life support: 7C: a guide to the International ACLS algorithms. The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.

Authors:  Charles D Deakin; Jonathan J S Ambler; Steven Shaw
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  A comparison of transthoracic impedance using standard defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads.

Authors:  C D Deakin; R M McLaren; G W Petley; F Clewlow; M J Dalrymple-Hay
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1998 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  G W Dalzell; A A Adgey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-06

5.  Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.

Authors:  D L Atkins; R E Kerber
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children.

Authors:  Marc D Berg; Ricardo A Samson; Robyn J Meyer; Lani L Clark; Terence D Valenzuela; Robert A Berg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.

Authors:  Vessela Krasteva; Mikhail Matveev; Nikolay Mudrov; Rada Prokopova
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.833

8.  Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.

Authors:  Roger D White; Thomas H Blackwell; James K Russell; David E Snyder; Dawn B Jorgenson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Peter A Meaney; Vinay M Nadkarni; Karl B Kern; Julia H Indik; Henry R Halperin; Robert A Berg
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Body weight is a predictor of biphasic shock success for low energy transthoracic defibrillation.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Craig B Clark; L Ray Davies; Gudjon Karlsson; M Bridget Zimmerman; Richard Kerber
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.